You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
which is a line positioned at the centre of the local region V used to segment the local region into the ridge and valley regions. Regions with grey levels
lower than DT are classified as ridges. Otherwise, they are classified as valleys
6.2.5.2 uses DT in f) as
x\times DT(1)+DT(0)
So while DT(n) suggest a function of sorts, it is reasonable to assume that DT is a line of the form
y = DT(1)\times x + DT(0)
which is very unusual. Maybe introduce DT, possibly using the standard notation for lines:
DT: y=mx+b
and use m and b? Or, at the very least, introduce it as
DT: y = DT(1) x + DT(0)
or, slightly better
DT: y = DT_1 x + DT_0
BTW, the exact same calculation is performed in 6.2.3.6.e), but there no Formula is given at all (which, personally, I find easier to follow - although it might be a good idea to move Fig. 6 a-c there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
6.2.3.1 describes DT as
which is a line positioned at the centre of the local region V used to segment the local region into the ridge and valley regions. Regions with grey levels
lower than DT are classified as ridges. Otherwise, they are classified as valleys
6.2.5.2 uses DT in f) as
x\times DT(1)+DT(0)
So while DT(n) suggest a function of sorts, it is reasonable to assume that DT is a line of the form
y = DT(1)\times x + DT(0)
which is very unusual. Maybe introduce DT, possibly using the standard notation for lines:
DT: y=mx+b
and use m and b? Or, at the very least, introduce it as
DT: y = DT(1) x + DT(0)
or, slightly better
DT: y = DT_1 x + DT_0
BTW, the exact same calculation is performed in 6.2.3.6.e), but there no Formula is given at all (which, personally, I find easier to follow - although it might be a good idea to move Fig. 6 a-c there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: