-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
Regressions compared to GNU coreutils 9.2, 9.3 and 9.4 #4627
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Labels
good first issue
For newcomers!
Comments
These match up with the changelog, for example:
|
cp sparse tests are SKIP because it is parsing the --debug output that we don't have:
|
This was referenced Apr 27, 2023
Merged
Updated test statuses as of todays' GNU test coverage |
sure :) |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Diffing the results from before and after #4601 and #4754
Some of them should be easy.
I noticed some regressions:
PASS -> FAIL:
{PASS,FAIL} -> SKIP
New tests - PASS directly
New tests - FAIL
cp --debug
#4909)To run them:
bash util/run-gnu-test.sh <test>
How i did: I downloaded the results gnu-full-result.json in the action. The one before the update to 9.2 and just did a diff -u
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: