-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.5k
ls: -k is not implemented #2257
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Note the prerequisite -s is not implemented as well:
uutils ls:
|
Hi, can I work on implementing this? |
sure |
If anyone wants to pick this up. I suggest improving the function display_item_long here to be configurable. Where:
This way the function can be reused for future purposes. I might come back for this later but for I need to do something else for now. Cheers! |
Hi, I think I have the basic changes ready for the Yet to fix:
Other than these, any inputs/ suggestions are appreciated. This is my first time trying to contribute :). Hopefully I've covered all the details in this post here. I will raise a PR once basic I'm done writing / testing basic test cases. Below captures few outputs:
corresponding
|
Hi @aburn, Awesome! Your results look very nice! We follow GNU by default (without looking at the GNU code for licensing reasons), so I think it's best to stick with what GNU is doing for the total size. The The tests don't need to be perfect on the first run. You can just open a PR (without You could also start with a draft PR. That makes it very easy for us to see the changes and give feedback. Thanks for picking this up and just let me know if you have any more questions! |
Ok. I just checked on my Linux machine (hopefully its GNU coreutils installed by default) and the documentation is very different from the OS X version :( .
Let me go through the GNU documentation and update my code accordingly.
Thanks! thats good to know. Once I make the current code compatible with GNU, I will remove
This is a good idea. I will raise a draft PR with my current code as is to get some early feedback if I can. of-course, in parallel , I will also be making changes to align with GNU instead of what I have on OS X. Thanks for the pointers @tertsdiepraam |
If someone is interested, you can resurrect: |
Let me try to necro this PR. |
Seems that #3052 fixed it |
With GNU:
us:
man:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: