8000 fix(cli): remove full-send flag and add it as a command instead by akhileshrangani4 · Pull Request #155 · tambo-ai/tambo · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

fix(cli): remove full-send flag and add it as a command instead #155

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2025
Merged

fix(cli): remove full-send flag and add it as a command instead #155

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 18, 2025

Conversation

akhileshrangani4
Copy link
Contributor
@akhileshrangani4 akhileshrangani4 commented Mar 18, 2025 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • The CLI now supports a direct "full-send" command, replacing the previous flag-based approach.

  • Documentation

    • Usage examples have been updated to demonstrate the new command syntax.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
coderabbitai bot commented Mar 18, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The CLI code has been updated to remove the fullSend flag from the CLIFlags interface. The command handling logic now directly recognizes the "full-send" command rather than checking a flag. Usage examples have also been updated to reflect this change, removing references to --full-send and instead demonstrating the direct command usage. The overall CLI structure remains the same, with the alteration streamlining how the "full-send" functionality is triggered.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
cli/.../cli.ts Removed the fullSend flag from CLIFlags and updated the command parsing logic to recognize "full-send" as a command. Usage examples have been updated accordingly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant CLI
    participant CmdHandler
    User->>CLI: Enter command ("full-send" / "init")
    CLI->>CmdHandler: Evaluate command type
    alt Command is "full-send"
        CmdHandler-->>CLI: Process full-send logic
    else Command is "init"
        CmdHandler-->>CLI: Process init logic
    end
    CLI-->>User: Return response
Loading

Poem

I'm a rabbit tapping keys so light,
Hop through the CLI with all my might.
"Full-send" now leads our joyful dance,
With streamlined logic, we advance.
Code hops high like a starry night,
In this change, all feels just right!
🐰✨

Tip

⚡🧪 Multi-step agentic review comment chat (experimental)
  • We're introducing multi-step agentic chat in review comments. This experimental feature enhances review discussions with the CodeRabbit agentic chat by enabling advanced interactions, including the ability to create pull requests directly from comments.
    - To enable this feature, set early_access to true under in the settings.
📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a51fc3c and 9727b02.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • cli/src/cli.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Definitions (1)
cli/src/cli.ts (1)
cli/src/commands/init.ts (1) (1)
  • handleInit (224:248)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cli/src/cli.ts (5)

8-11: Interface change looks good

The removal of the fullSend flag from the CLIFlags interface is appropriate since this functionality is now implemented as a command rather than a flag. This simplifies the interface and makes the CLI structure more consistent.

20-22: Command listing properly updated

The command listing now correctly includes full-send as a distinct command with a clear description of its purpose. This change aligns with the PR objective of converting the flag to a dedicated command.

28-30: Examples updated correctly

The examples have been appropriately updated to replace the --full-send flag with a standalone example for the full-send command. This provides clear guidance to users on how to use the new command structure.

55-55: Command handling logic updated properly

The command handling condition now correctly checks for either init or full-send commands. This logical change supports the new command structure while maintaining backward compatibility with existing code.

57-57: Parameter determination logic is correct

The fullSend parameter is now determined by checking if the command is full-send rather than reading from a flag. This properly implements the conversion from flag to command while maintaining the expected behavior in the handleInit function.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the fix label Mar 18, 2025
@akhileshrangani4 akhileshrangani4 merged commit 2b0797a into main Mar 18, 2025
6 checks passed
@akhileshrangani4 akhileshrangani4 deleted the akhilesh/cli-improvements branch March 18, 2025 18:29
@alecf alecf mentioned this pull request Mar 18, 2025
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
fix
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@akhileshrangani4
0