CRDS reference files for SOSS extract1d different from what UdeM provided · Issue #26 · talensgj/jwst · GitHub
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I checked the spectrace.fits files for SS96 comparing what we delivered to what they STScI has in the CRDS and there are differences. They set to zero what they assumed would be reference pixels. They also used a padding value definittion different from what we meant XPAD=20 for them means in the oversampled coordinate frame, we meant in native pixel equivalent. SO there is a mismatch in the size of the oversampled, padded image.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I checked the spectrace.fits files for SS96 comparing what we delivered to what they STScI has in the CRDS and there are differences. They set to zero what they assumed would be reference pixels. They also used a padding value definittion different from what we meant XPAD=20 for them means in the oversampled coordinate frame, we meant in native pixel equivalent. SO there is a mismatch in the size of the oversampled, padded image.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: