You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thank you for your great work on this project!
I have a question regarding the temporal reward calculation. Suppose there is a group with 8 completions. If the accuracy of the normal video sequence is higher than the chaotic temporal sequence, a reward of 0.3 is added to all rewards with accuracy = 1 in the normal sequence. However, when calculating the advantage (i.e., after normalization), the relative values between rewards seem unchanged.
It seems that after normalization, the relative advantage values remain unchanged even if the rewards are shifted up by a constant amount when accuracy = 1.
Could you please help me understand what the effect or significance of this reward adjustment is in practice? Am I missing something about how this influences the training or learning process?
Thank you very much for your time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thank you for your great work on this project!
I have a question regarding the temporal reward calculation. Suppose there is a group with 8 completions. If the accuracy of the normal video sequence is higher than the chaotic temporal sequence, a reward of 0.3 is added to all rewards with accuracy = 1 in the normal sequence. However, when calculating the advantage (i.e., after normalization), the relative values between rewards seem unchanged.
For example:
It seems that after normalization, the relative advantage values remain unchanged even if the rewards are shifted up by a constant amount when accuracy = 1.
Could you please help me understand what the effect or significance of this reward adjustment is in practice? Am I missing something about how this influences the training or learning process?
Thank you very much for your time!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: