8000 3.5 and gpt4 fail · Issue #22 · socketteer/loom · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

3.5 and gpt4 fail #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
catbears opened this issue Aug 6, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

3.5 and gpt4 fail #22

catbears opened this issue Aug 6, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@catbears
Copy link
catbears commented Aug 6, 2023

Thank you for the practical UI, I wonder why there aren't many like this around already (paid and free, local and remote models). Probably we're way ahead of the crowd or something. It's a mystery for me lol

The issue: it seems that I cannot use gpt4 and gpt-3.5 (+turbo) with the standard settings. What works is text-davinci-003. The error I get if I choose gpt4 or 3.5 is the following:

WARNING:root:Failed with exception: Invalid URL (POST /v1/engines/gpt-3.5-turbo/chat/completions), Retrying in 1 seconds...
WARNING:root:Failed with exception: Invalid URL (POST /v1/engines/gpt-3.5-turbo/chat/completions), Retrying in 2 seconds...
WARNING:root:Failed with exception: Invalid URL (POST /v1/engines/gpt-3.5-turbo/chat/completions), Retrying in 4 seconds...
cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object
ERROR cannot unpack non-iterable NoneType object. Deleting failures

I tried finding the issue in the code, but could not see it (no expert in their API). I you look here: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create then it seems that the URL is not the same anymore. They use https://api.openai.com/v1/chat/completions

Thanks for looking into this.

@matt-bernstein
Copy link

#24 fixes this

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
0