You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be great if there could be a flag such as --no-ignore-vcs-exclude, which would be similar to --no-ignore-vcs except it would still take .gitignore into account but only not .git/info/exclude. Maybe this seems like a too specific feature but the reason why I think this would make sense is that I would often use .git/info/exclude for files that I actually do want to see and use locally, but only for myself and not commit them to the repo. It's different from .gitignore which most likely no one wants to see (therefore including me), and is the reason that this is actually checked into a repo.
Would this make sense? If this feature sounds okay and no one is able to work on it atm I could also take a stab but first wanted to check if it sounds reasonable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @VRehnberg, thanks for pointing out this possibility. The additional functionality I would be interested in is to support .gitignore files anywhere. Ie not only in the cwd, but also in subfolders, at ~/.gitignore etc.
It would be great if there could be a flag such as
--no-ignore-vcs-exclude
, which would be similar to--no-ignore-vcs
except it would still take.gitignore
into account but only not.git/info/exclude
. Maybe this seems like a too specific feature but the reason why I think this would make sense is that I would often use.git/info/exclude
for files that I actually do want to see and use locally, but only for myself and not commit them to the repo. It's different from.gitignore
which most likely no one wants to see (therefore including me), and is the reason that this is actually checked into a repo.Would this make sense? If this feature sounds okay and no one is able to work on it atm I could also take a stab but first wanted to check if it sounds reasonable?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: