8000 Soft morphological filtering of solar images · Issue #10 · sunpy/sunkit-image · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Soft morphological filtering of solar images #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
6 tasks
nabobalis opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Open
6 tasks

Soft morphological filtering of solar images #10

nabobalis opened this issue Feb 23, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
Effort High Requires a large time investment. Feature Request New feature wanted. Package Novice Requires little technical knowledge of the package. Priority Low Rapid action not required.

Comments

@nabobalis
Copy link
Member
nabobalis commented Feb 23, 2018 •
edited
Loading

The idea comes from this paper.

Base:

  • Replicating the training dataset. (Add noise manually to a set of images)
  • Working and well implemented algorithm.
  • Compared to known output (Have to find source code.)

Extra:

  • Optimized as much as possible for memory and CPU time.
  • 100% test coverage
  • Documentation and a worked example.
@dokutagero

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@nabobalis

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@dokutagero

This comment has been minimized.

Sign in to view
@nabobalis nabobalis added Feature Request New feature wanted. Effort High Requires a large time investment. Pac 999A kage Novice Requires little technical knowledge of the package. Priority Low Rapid action not required. labels Jan 15, 2019
@nabobalis
Copy link
Member Author
nabobalis commented Jan 16, 2019 •
edited
Loading

#35 adds an example that uses https://github.com/astropy/astroscrappy and it shows promise with some parameter fidding. We could either close this in favour or still implement the original feature.

@wafels wafels mentioned this issue Jan 28, 2019
Merged
@vatch123 vatch123 mentioned this issue Jun 27, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Effort High Requires a large time investment. Feature Request New feature wanted. Package Novice Requires little technical knowledge of the package. Priority Low Rapid action not required.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@nabobalis @dokutagero
0