You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
One idea for a third stage could be to use an approach like in The landscape of biomedical research to generate an embedding database, and assess the similarity between the paper's abstract and existing papers. Possibly, one may also try to assess if important similar papers have not been cited, or see if similar papers are clustered in specific journals
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
That would indeed be super cool. If similarity could be assessed, it could also help identify suitable journals for a given paper. The endgame might be something like Cursor for academic writing — an assistant that suggests relevant literature, formatting, and framing during the manuscript creation process. Many exciting opportunities to streamline and improve academic publishing.
I'll add this idea to the README under a new section titled "Future ideas" so we can track and build on it as the project evolves.
One idea for a third stage could be to use an approach like in The landscape of biomedical research to generate an embedding database, and assess the similarity between the paper's abstract and existing papers. Possibly, one may also try to assess if important similar papers have not been cited, or see if similar papers are clustered in specific journals
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: