8000 5.20 vs 5.21 · Issue #458 · jobisoft/quicktext · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

5.20 vs 5.21 #458

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
weksupport opened this issue Apr 30, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

5.20 vs 5.21 #458

weksupport opened this issue Apr 30, 2025 · 1 comment

Comments

@weksupport
Copy link

Been testing here and there with 6.*, still need to do something with the (C)Scripts conversion
In the meantime I got an update to 5.21 (which is not on Github by the way?). There is an issue with ENTER. If I do a Keyword without an extra ENTER before it, it does nothing. If I do an ENTER and then Keyword, it does work! I experienced this before, but up to and including 5.20 I didn't have any problems. As of 5.21 I did and then I went back to 5.20.

But... let us not forget: what a great add-on this is.
Thx!

@jobisoft
Copy link
Owner

I have officially released the community script add-on.

https://addons.thunderbird.net/addon/quicktext-community-scripts/

Maybe that reduces the trouble with using v6. In the next version of v6 it will make the found extertal scripts also available through the drop down menu in the templates editor. For now, you have to know which scripts exist.

The reported problem with ENTER exists also on v6?

So when you enter the keyword at the very beginning of the message, it is not recognized, but only on the second line? Does it work on the first line with a few other chars before the keyword?

Or does it ONLY work at the beginning of a line with an empty line before?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants
0