You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I loved this read! I actually included a link to in an official enterprise documentation, to stress how convenient is to stick with shared and ecognized standards.
I would add AMQP, notably used by RabbitMQ, that has a very peculiar version number system. The existing AMQP versions are
0-8
0-9
0-9-1
0-10
(yes, with the -)
and
1.0
(with .)
To make the versioning number system more sentimental
"despite similar names and, to some extent, a common lineage, AMQP 0-9-1 and AMQP 1.0 are completely different messaging protocols and not a revision of the same idea. AMQP 1.0 has a different scope and topology model" AMQP 0-9-1 Protocol Specification
I loved this read! I actually included a link to in an official enterprise documentation, to stress how convenient is to stick with shared and ecognized standards.
I would add AMQP, notably used by RabbitMQ, that has a very peculiar version number system. The existing AMQP versions are
0-8
0-9
0-9-1
0-10
(yes, with the
-
)and
1.0
(with
.
)To make the versioning number system more sentimental
To make it easier, of course,
AMQP 0-9-1
AMQP 0-10
are completely different Protocols (as confirmed by the Redhat documentation)Isn't it exquisite?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: