Flip the DRE from preference to cost #1817
Comments
|
Is this better as a milestone, that has these issues supporting it? |
|
I made this issue because I read a github blog from October 1, 2024 about a new feature that would al 8000 low adding sub-issues as an opt-in beta thing. I have an item in tomorrows Fuel Cycles meeting agenda to talk about this, but I went ahead and made this issue before I realized it was just a beta feature. This issue sort of corresponds with one of the milestones already, so if after thinking about it you don't want to opt into that beta I can delete it, but if you do, then it's already all here for me to play around with the feature (or at least that was my thinking) |
|
I'm curious to see how sub-issues and milestones all work together in the project.... This top issue is probably already part of a current milestone (or could be), and I don't think we can nest milestones, so maybe sub-issues make sense. |
|
I've entered the beta, so feel free to move these all to sub-issues and see how we can manipulate them in the project |
Currently the DRE solves with respect to maximizing preference. However, a more realistic approach is to try to minimize cost. Notionally, there is a simple inverse relationship between the two. However, as Cyclus aims to be more realistic, that relationship may change. This issue will act as a blanket issue for the first part of the CINR Font-End Realism project.
Final Completion non-issue Checklist:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: