8000 Suggestion: Add a generic sidechain and further missing essentials structures · Issue #90 · bitwig/dawproject · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

Suggestion: Add a generic sidechain and further missing essentials structures #90

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
Jurek-Raben opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Suggestion: Add a generic sidechain and further missing essentials structures #90

Jurek-Raben opened this issue Jan 26, 2025 · 0 comments

Comments

@Jurek-Raben
Copy link
Jurek-Raben commented Jan 26, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Hi,

currently the representation of the following common song's structures still are missing:

  • A simple sidechain structure (I think a "receiver"-approach instead a classical sender-view would be beneficial here, so the target holds the sidechain information, not the sending device, please also read here: Suggestion: switching to "receiver" approach, getting rid of the send device #91 )
  • A simple group container (the group track structure maybe could be reused, marking tracks as type="inline" or something)
  • An util device being able to capture a gainer, a panner, phase switching and L/R switching
  • Loop region

So I would like to suggest to you to implement these ones, too. I might have overlooked other missing essentials.

Dawproject is really great, it so useful to be able to switch daws while working on a project! It is time to think this project bigger, in my opinion.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Jurek-Raben
0