Project: choose a license

@brudfors

We need to decide on a license before going public. I'd rather be very permissive.

A solution is GNU-GPL, which is quite permissive but forbids users to distribute closed-source software that would rely on nitorch. That would probably be a big blocking point for you @brudfors
Another solution is the MIT license, which lets people do whatever they want, including develop closed-source software. The issue then comes from the spm module: are we limited by the SPM license, which is GNU-GPL? (I think we are). We'd need to discuss this with JA and GF.

Provide feedback