Description
Hi, as Prodigal v2.6.3, we observe with pyrodigal a difference in translation result for some start codon (TTG).
nuc sequence (Lactobacillus)
TTGGGCATACCGGCTGAATACGTCTTATTCGACAGCTGTTTCTCTTCACCTAAAATGTTCTGGCAGCTGAAACAATTAGGGTTAGACAGCGTAGGCATGCTTAAGCGGACCAAGAAAGCTTATTATCGTTACCGTGGCCGACTTTATGATGTCAAAGGCCTGTACGAGCGCTTAGCTGCTTCCAAAATGCGTCAAAAAGAAGACTATCCCTATAGCAGCGTGGTCGAACCTGAATATCAGGGACATGTTTTCCAAATTAGATTAGTCTATGTCACTAAGCGCGGCGGTAAAGGAAAATATTTGGTACTGGTAACCACGCAATACAAGCTGCGATCAAAGTATTGCACGTCTTCTATGACAAGTGGAACAGAGCTTATAATCATGTCATAA
Prodigal / pyrodigal output
MGIPAEYVLFDSCFSSPKMFWQLKQLGLDSVGMLKRTKKAYYRYRGRLYDVKGLYERLAASKMRQKEDYPYSSVVEPEYQGHVFQIRLVYVTKRGGKGKYLVLVTTQYKLRSKYCTSSMTSGTELIIMS*
Expected sequence (Expasy 5'3' Frame 1)
LGIPAEYVLFDSCFSSPKMFWQLKQLGLDSVGMLKRTKKAYYRYRGRLYDVKGLYERLAASKMRQKEDYPYSSVVEPEYQGHVFQIRLVYVTKRGGGKYLVLVTTQYKLRSKYCTSSMTSGTELIIMS*
Maybe it is due to the use of wrong genetic code in this case ?