This repository was archived by the owner on Dec 27, 2018. It is now read-only.
IS this stable at all? #4
Comments
|
@wgaylord : Definitely not stable, but I'd go for experimental. I use the following script to test the FUSE part, although a lot of things can go wrong: import fuse
import fs.expose.fuse.operations
#source = fs.open_fs('ssh://something/')
source = fs.open_fs('temp://')
ops = fs.expose.fuse.operations.PyfilesystemFuseOperations(source)
fuse.FUSE(ops, "/tmp/test", debug=True, foreground=True) |
|
Annoyingly fuse doesn’t exactly work on windows.
… On May 9, 2018, at 6:48 AM, Martin Larralde ***@***.***> wrote:
@wgaylord : Definitely not stable, but I'd go for experimental.
I use the following script to test the FUSE part, although a lot of things can go wrong:
import fuse
import fs.expose.fuse.operations
#source = fs.open_fs('ssh://something/')
source = fs.open_fs('temp://')
ops = fs.expose.fuse.operations.PyfilesystemFuseOperations(source)
fuse.FUSE(ops, "/tmp/test", debug=True, foreground=True)
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
|
You'll have to wait for the Dokan code to be ported, but since I don't have a proper windows machine to develop on at the moment, I can't work on it right now. |
|
Oh. Was sort of confused because this was mentioned in the thread saying Dokdn support was ported finally.
… On May 9, 2018, at 7:19 AM, Martin Larralde ***@***.***> wrote:
You'll have to wait for the Dokan code to be ported, b
7714
ut since I don't have a proper windows machine to develop on at the moment, I can't work on it right now.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
|
|
Has this moved forward? |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: