8000 SPDX validation should consider arbitrary expressions in format `<KNOWN-LICENSE-ID>"+"` as valid · Issue #110 · aboutcode-org/license-expression · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content
SPDX validation should consider arbitrary expressions in format <KNOWN-LICENSE-ID>"+" as valid #110
Open
@jkowalleck

Description

@jkowalleck

SPDX license expression allow the following Simple license expressions:

An SPDX License List Short Form Identifier with a unary "+" operator suffix to represent the current version of the license or any later version. For example: CDDL-1.0+

spec & docs:

request

make the validator and parser support SPDX License Identifiers with a + at the end.

reproduce

I tested with exactly this example CDDL-1.0+ value, but got a negative, where I expected a positive:

tested with license-expression==30.4.1

>>> from license_expression import get_spdx_licensing
>>> lic = get_spdx_licensing()

>>> lic.validate('CDDL-1.0')
ExpressionInfo(
    original_expressio
55CA
n='CDDL-1.0',
    normalized_expression='CDDL-1.0',
    errors=[],
    invalid_symbols=[]
)

>>> lic.validate('CDDL-1.0+')
ExpressionInfo(
    original_expression='CDDL-1.0+',
    normalized_expression=None,
    errors=['Unknown license key(s): CDDL-1.0+'],
    invalid_symbols=['CDDL-1.0+']
)

>>> lic.validate('MIT OR CDDL-1.0+')
ExpressionInfo(
    original_expression='MIT OR CDDL-1.0+',
    normalized_expression=None,
    errors=['Unknown license key(s): CDDL-1.0+'],
    invalid_symbols=['CDDL-1.0+']
)

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      0