-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 679
NVDA browse mode doesn't recognize focus function in some situations with chrome browser #12084
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
@feerrenrut Hey, there. May I ask did you check my NVDA bug report regarding this issue? |
In the future, please fill out the bug template. It is structured to ensure that you provide the information we need in an easy to read way. This does look to me like a legitimate bug. I tested this with Edge (Anaheim) To anyone else looking at this, the test sample contains two variations (Example 1 and Example 2), the first one works as expected the second one doesn't. The difference between the two is only that the wrapping Note that after pressing the button for Example 2 the virtual cursor is not updated, with focus highlight, it seems to be left with the button (now hidden), focus is tracked to the edit field but NVDA does not report this. |
Not sure if this is completely in line with Aria spec. @jcsteh what do you think? |
After testing with NVDA 2025 Beta and firefox 138 or Chrome canary 138
This is probably bad web authoring. I am closing as invalid. Focus redirection should be handled by the web author. |
Prior to explain this issue, I created sample page for testing.
Issue description:
In chrome browser,
In that case, if this edit field and button is the DOM last element or connected with div with role group and aria-label, browse mode doesn't recognize focus function.
Once I turn off browse mode and press the button, focus is moved to edit field and NVDA says edit.
But once I turn on browse mode and press the button, NVDA says nothing.
How to test:
NVDA browse mode should recognize focus function with any conditions.
Thank you so much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: