8000 Lunacek bi-Rastrigin Function: wrong documentation? · Issue #1266 · numbbo/coco · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content
8000

Lunacek bi-Rastrigin Function: wrong documentation? #1266

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
brockho opened this issue Jan 11, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Lunacek bi-Rastrigin Function: wrong documentation? #1266

brockho opened this issue Jan 11, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees
@nikohansen
Labels
Documentation

Comments

@brockho
Copy link
Contributor
brockho commented Jan 11, 2017

In the documentation of the bbob functions (http://coco.lri.fr/downloads/download15.03/bbobdocfunctions.pdf), the definition of the Lunacek bi-Rastrigin Function (f24) says that the optimum is located in $\mu_0 {\bf 1}\pm$ with $\mu_0=2.5. In the plots, however, and in COCO's implementation, the best-parameter value is either +1.25 or -1.25.

Is there a mistake in the documentation or am I missing something?
@oaelhara
Copy link
Contributor

In the documentation, ${\bf x}$ is multiplied by 2 in order to obtain $\hat{ {\bf x} }$ from which the $\mu_0 {\bf 1}$ is subtracted.
So the optimum in ${\bf x}$ is +1.25 or-1.25...

@brockho
Copy link
Contributor Author
brockho commented Jan 12, 2017

We agreed on Jan 12, 2017 that the pdf should be updated in the sense that for f24, the optimum should be changed to \frac{\mu_0}{2} {\bf 1\pm}.

@nikohansen
Copy link
Contributor

see also #837

@brockho brockho mentioned this issue Nov 15, 2017
Closed
@nikohansen
Copy link
Contributor

Fixed in the document source. The available pdfs will be updated timely.

@nikohansen
Copy link
Contributor

The fixed document were uploaded to HAL and to http://coco.gforge.inria.fr/downloads/download16.00 and are used at the COCO gforge home and in the links at the latest old release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@nikohansen nikohansen

Labels
Documentation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@nikohansen @oaelhara @brockho
0