8000 [FEATURE] Add arm64 support for rhel based distros · Issue #625 · moosefs/moosefs · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content

[FEATURE] Add arm64 support for rhel based distros #625

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
jorjenava opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[FEATURE] Add arm64 support for rhel based distros #625

jorjenava opened this issue Dec 22, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@jorjenava
Copy link
jorjenava commented Dec 22, 2024

Have you read through available documentation, open Github issues and Github Ideas Discussions?

Yes
#405 (Over 3 years old)

System information

Your moosefs version and its origin (moosefs.com, packaged by distro, built from source, ...).

N/A to this request

Operating system (distribution) and kernel version.

Client:
AlmaLinux 9.5 (Teal Serval)
Kernel 6.6.51-20241008.v8.1.el9

Hardware / network configuration, and underlying filesystems on master, chunkservers, and clients.

Client: Raspberry Pi 5
Servers: N/A to this request

How much data is tracked by moosefs master (order of magnitude)?

N/A to this request

Describe your request:

Would you add an arm64 repo/rpm package for rhel based distros?
I have confirmed that the source builds on AlmaLinux 9 on a raspberry pi 5.

What new feature would you like to see implemented in MooseFS?

N/A

Why this feature? Is it a necessity or a nice to have? Is this feature related to any other features or problems in the open issues?

There are already arm64 builds for debian based distros but it would be nice to have an arm64 bulid for rhel based distros.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant
0