Question: Best practice for aligning reads against two highly similar genomes · Issue #51 · marbl/Winnowmap · GitHub
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am using winnowmap to align sequencing reads against two highly similar genomes (strains of the same species). I would like to determine the best approach.
Can I concatenate the two genomes into a single reference and allow winnowmap to choose the best match, or should I create separate indexes for each genome and perform two independent alignments?
I found concatenating the genomes very useful because it allows me to very quickly see how reads "compete" and to which genome they do align best, but I am not sure if winnowmap's strategies and algorithms are adequate for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am using winnowmap to align sequencing reads against two highly similar genomes (strains of the same species). I would like to determine the best approach.
Can I concatenate the two genomes into a single reference and allow winnowmap to choose the best match, or should I create separate indexes for each genome and perform two independent alignments?
I found concatenating the genomes very useful because it allows me to very quickly see how reads "compete" and to which genome they do align best, but I am not sure if winnowmap's strategies and algorithms are adequate for this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: