8000 Content-Type in swagger spec is ignored · Issue #458 · Yelp/bravado · GitHub
[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
Skip to content
Content-Type in swagger spec is ignored #458
Open
@mattdowdell

Description

@mattdowdell

I have an endpoint roughly defined as follows in my swagger spec, which I'm using the RequestsClient to intercat with underneath:

  /resource/{resourceID}:
    patch:
      tags:
        - my-tag
      summary: Updates resource
      description: 'Updates an existing resource by ID'
      operationId: updateResource
      consumes:
        - multipart/form-data
      produces:
        - application/json
      parameters:
        - in: path
          name: resourceID
          required: true
          type: string
          description: The ID of the resource to update
        - in: formData
          name: resourceConfigFile
          type: file
          required: false
        - in: formData
          name: resourceFoo
          type: string
          required: false
      responses:
        '204':
          description: Update successful
        '400':
          description: Bad request
          schema:
            $ref: '#/definitions/ErrorResponse'
        '404':
          description: kube client info not found
          schema:
            $ref: '#/definitions/ErrorResponse'
        '500':
          description: Internal / unexpected error
          schema:
            $ref: '#/definitions/ErrorResponse'

When I send a request to it without any of the required parameters, I get an error back from my server claiming that the Content-Type header is wrong. This is entirely correct as there's no content-type set at all:

send: b'PATCH /api/v2/example/resource/7a8e7f58-150a-41cb-ab3d-5910742761b0 HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:7070\r\nUser-Agent: python-requests/2.23.0\r\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\r\nAccept: */*\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\nContent-Length: 0\r\n\r\n'

If I sent a request with the non-file optional parameter, I get a 415 unsupported media error back. This time it's because the content-type was set to application/x-www-form-urlencoded, where the request looks like this:

send: b'PATCH /api/v2/example/resource/7a8e7f58-150a-41cb-ab3d-5910742761b0 HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: localhost:7070\r\nUser-Agent: python-requests/2.23.0\r\nAccept-Encoding: gzip, deflate\r\nAccept: */*\r\nConnection: keep-alive\r\nContent-Length: 15\r\nContent-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded\r\n\r\n'
send: b'resourceFoo=bar'

Finally, if I actually send the file, the correct Content-Type is set and everything works as expected. In trying to workaround this, I tried to set the content type by hand and then went down the rabbit hole learning about setting the boundary and related things. In general, the advice seems to be to let the browser or underlying library do it for you.

At the moment, I can't tell if this is a bug in bravado, or something lower down. Reading over this suggests the correct thing to do if multipart/form-data is specified is to always use the files=... parameter when using requests.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions

      0