Could AOP's package be part of a normal package rather than a separate dependency library? · Issue #33 · XianyuTech/aspectd · GitHub
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/
You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings
It is very inconvenient to transfer the Main Package to the AOP Module for AOP functions, and the Main Package will be unidirectionally dependent by AOP, making it difficult to use classes in the AOP Module.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
lfkdsk
changed the title
Can AOP's package be part of a normal package rather than a separate dependency library?
Could AOP's package be part of a normal package rather than a separate dependency library?
Nov 22, 2019
It is very inconvenient to transfer the Main Package to the AOP Module for AOP functions, and the Main Package will be unidirectionally dependent by AOP, making it difficult to use classes in the AOP Module.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: