User talk:Trevj/Archives/Archive 6

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Buff (colour). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 11:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done -- Trevj (talk) 12:22, 2 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi! Welcome to the fifth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

• Guest activity increased in July. Questions are up from an average of 36 per week in June to 43 per week in July, and guest profile creation has also increased. This is likely a result of the automatic invite experiments we started near the end of month, which seeks to lessen the burden on hosts and other volunteers who manually invite editors. During the last week of July, questions doubled in the Teahouse! (But don't let that deter you from inviting editors to the Teahouse, please, there are still lots of new editors who haven't found Teahouse yet.)
• More Teahouse hosts than ever. We had 12 new hosts sign up to participate at the Teahouse! We now have 35 hosts volunteering at the Teahouse. Feel free to stop by and see them all here.
• Phase two update: Host sprint. In August, the Teahouse team plans to improve the host experience by developing a simpler new-host creation process, a better way of surfacing active hosts, and a host lounge renovation. Take a look at the plan and weigh in here.
• New Teahouse guest barnstar is awarded to first recipient: Charlie Inks. Using the Teahouse barnstar designed by Heatherawalls, hosts hajatvrc and Ryan Vesey created the new Teahouse Guest Barnstar. The first recipient is Charlie Inks, for her boldness in asking questions at the Teahouse. Check out the award in action here.
• Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania! The Teahouse was a hot topic at Wikimania this past month, where editor retention and interface design was heavily discussed. Sarah and Jonathan presented the Teahouse during the Wikimedia Fellowships panel. Slides can be viewed here. A lunch was also held at Wikimania for Teahouse hosts.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. Sarah (talk) 08:39, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just noticed you hit 9,900 edits :) On your way to 10k!!! SarahStierch (talk) 23:16, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you I'd have appreciated this last night but it's a little early in the day now! As for the 10k, I guess it depends which counting stats you have access to. Anyway, it looks as if you'll be staying ahead of me for a long, long time yet. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 08:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Trevj. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 23:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 23:17, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  In progress -- Trevj (talk) 07:58, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry - too much stuff going on IRL to get to this after all.   -- Trevj (talk) 08:09, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Abortion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 00:16, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Not done -- Trevj (talk) 08:10, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Trevj. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection.
Message added 15:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 15:07, 10 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bicycle Shaped Object is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bicycle Shaped Object (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 01:59, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notification. -- Trevj (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Biographies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 12:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Not done -- Trevj (talk) 08:11, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Many thanks for your help in editing. I have made a number of edits as you have suggested, as well as added two additional cited sources for more background, as also suggested. Any further comments are welcome! And thank you for helping me create my FIRST article. I look forward ti joining the effort as I get more experience. Best- Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jimdas2012 (talk • contribs) 21:28, 19 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. I'm pretty sure this message wasn't intended for me, as I've not been involved in this! -- Trevj (talk) 09:28, 20 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Trevj. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 06:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 06:12, 24 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox software. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 01:15, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done -- Trevj (talk) 12:22, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In the Faxed Atmosphere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In the Faxed Atmosphere until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Secretlondon (talk) 23:20, 25 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the notification. -- Trevj (talk) 08:46, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hi Trevj! Thanks for being a host at the Teahouse! We're working on the Host lounge renovations and we've created a new way for hosts to become hosts. Please take a few minutes and test it out here, by creating your new host profile. It's also a good excuse to update your image, quote, and information about yourself :) You can join in on the host discussion about the new feature here. See you at the Teahouse! SarahStierch (talk) 19:46, 27 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Done -- Trevj (talk) 08:29, 28 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Reincarnation research. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 14:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Not done -- Trevj (talk) 12:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

I am curious about your AFD close. No consensus? It seems to me that there was a clear consensus to keep with 21/27 !votes going that way. What exactly is your rationale against closing as "keep"? Elizium23 (talk) 15:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. By simply counting the !votes, yes it looks as if the consensus was to keep. However, it's true that the subject of the article may not have the lasting notability required by WP:PERSISTENCE. The nominator's WP:NOTNEWSPAPER rationale was also supported by another editor. There was some support for merging, with such editors concerned that notability isn't established. A number of the keep !votes seemed to me to be little more than WP:ITSNOTABLE, which doesn't equate to an overwhelming consensus to keep based on policy. Another alternative would have been to relist the debate in the hope that more policy-based reasons would be discussed. But IMHO that would waste editors' time because it really seems too early in this case to categorically determine whether the painting is notable or not, as judged by enduring news coverage or WP:EFFECT.

I hope that explanation is of some help. If an admin disagrees with my closure and rationale, s/he can always reopen the discussion. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 15:37, 1 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi! Welcome to the sixth edition of The Tea Leaf, the official newsletter of the Teahouse!

• Teahouse serves over 700 new editors in six months on Wikipedia! Since February 27, 741 new editors have participated at the Teahouse. The Q&A board and the guest intro pages are more active than ever.

 

• Automatic invites are doing the trick: 50% more new editors visiting each week. Ever since HostBot's automated invite trial phase began we've seen a boost in new editor participation. Automating a baseline set of invitations also allows Teahouse hosts to focus on serving hot cups of help to guests, instead of spending countless hours inviting.
• Guests to the Teahouse continue to edit more & interact more with other community members than non-Teahouse guests according to six month metrics. Teahouse guests make more than twice the article edits and edit more talk pages than other new editors.
• New host process implemented which encourages anyone to get started as a Teahouse host in a few easy steps. Stop by the hosts page and become a Teahouse host today!
• Host lounge renovations nearing completion. Working closely with Teahouse hosts, we've made some major renovations to the Teahouse Host Lounge - the main hangout and resource space for hosts. Learn more about the improvements here.

As always, thanks for supporting the Teahouse project! Stop by and visit us today!

You are receiving The Tea Leaf after expressing interest or participating in the Teahouse! To remove yourself from receiving future newsletters, please remove your username here. EdwardsBot (talk) 00:12, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Trevj. You have new messages at Wikipedia_talk:Teahouse/Host_lounge.
Message added 22:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

SarahStierch (talk) 22:47, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Heads-up see Talk:Colorfulness#Requested move. I have reformatted you request. If you want to place a requested move in future please use {{requested move}} template as described at WP:RM -- PBS (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Yes, that makes sense. -- Trevj (talk) 11:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bletchley Park, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Oops. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 11:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Information technology. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — RFC bot (talk) 03:15, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Not done -- Trevj (talk) 12:05, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hello, thank you for your recent contributions to an article relating to graffiti or graffiti culture! You may be interested in WikiProject Graffiti, a group working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics relating to graffiti. We would greatly value you joining our WikiProject, or adding some input at our talk page.

Hi Trevj, with your Brizzle interests, you might be someone who'd like to join in. Sionk (talk) 11:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Thank you You're right that it does interest me. I'll give it some thought, but don't plan on joining for the moment because I've simply too many other things going on (in no particular order, a photo, some computing stuff, possible article resurrections, plenty of userspace drafts, and IRL things too). Cheers anyway. -- Trevj (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

This is an archive of past discussions with Trevj. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.