TobyJ

The information at the above page: where did you want it to go? It can't stay where it is because there is no such user as User:WikiProject Streetcars=edit -- Francs2000 | Talk   18:45, 22 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Either go to Talk:Tram or Talk:Streetcar, click on "edit this page" and then add your comment at the bottom, remembering to sign your name. I will delete the other page you created. -- Francs2000 | Talk   19:01, 22 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I have restored the message to User:TobyJ/Streetcars message. The 'project' is Wikipedia:WikiProject Streetcars. -- Francs2000 | Talk   21:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

You may be interested in this article; and if care to comment on Talk:Chimera, this would been a good time. Septentrionalis 06:50, 15 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

I am not sure why they deleted SFEDI, but I am sure they had a good reason. I was just there to clean up the loose redirect. Cheers.- the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 16:11, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Interesting, I left a note with the deleter. Depending on what he says, I might apply for deletion review. Tell me, what is SFEDI? Do you have a link to a website about it, perhaps? - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 16:16, 11 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hey, see the SFEDI listing at Wikipedia:Deletion_review. You can vote as well. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 00:45, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Congrats on the undeletion and AfD. Just goes to show you - the processes here work. I am gratified. See you around. - the.crazy.russian τ ç ë 04:05, 21 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

CONGRATS! It was kept. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 06:11, 25 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You may be interested in the new Stub at Visual pun. —Toby Bartels 01:31, 10 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I am not an admin so I couldn't have deleted it. Nor would I have wanted to. :) It might have had something to do with the database lockup wikipedia had yesterday. I purged the article and it's back again. Thanks for the warning, Garion96 (talk) 12:19, 16 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

I posted this over at Talk:Co-oepratives, but I'll cross-post it here. I'm interested in your comments...

I'm actually somewhat tempted to rewrite the 'Legal entity' section when I get the chance. The situation, in practice, seems to be more complex than the text makes out:

1) I think that unincorporated Co-operatives may be more common than you think. To cite one study, Alison Bourn's study of food co-operatives in Victoria, Australia (Bourn, Alison, et. al., “Food Co-operatives in Victoria by The Victorian Food Co-operative Study Group”, Collingwood: Victorian Food Co-operative Study Group, July 1984.) found that (particularly among poorer socio-economic groups in downtrodden small towns, housing estates, and the poorer inner urban areas) there were a significant number of buying groups or buying clubs which were, functionally, food co-operatives or consumers' co-operatives, but (due to a lack of resources, knowledge, etc.) had not formally been incorporated. To cite some higher profile examples, from the 1970s to the 1980s, the Co-operative Federation of Victoria had been an unincorporated body ( http://www.australia.coop/publish/article_240.php ). If memory serves me correct, weren't the Rochdale Pioneers (or at least some of their contemporaries or predecessors) unincorporated? It is also not uncommon for a Co-oeprative to begin as an unincorporated body amongst a group of friends and then, beyond a certain level of growth, to incorporate. Anyway, the phenomenon is also discussed by Ray Radford.(Radford, Ray; and Keenan, Michelle; "Food co-ops: A Resource Handbook," Melbourne: V.C.O.S.S., 1988.)

2) It is also not uncommon for small to medium Co-operatives, in which all (or at least most) of the members are also members of another organisation (for example, if a group of people who all attend the same school, live in the same housing estate, or are members of the same non-profit organisation) to operate under the legal auspice of that organisation. The reason, for example, why the food co-operatives at Melbourne, Monash, and Latrobe Unviersity are so concerned about VSU is because they are operating under te legal auspice of their respective student unions. Similarly, Under Current Co-op was run for a number of years under the legal auspice of the Brotherhood of St. Laurence(Manton, Joe, et. al., “Under Current Co-op Helpful Information for Co-ops”, Fitzroy: Under Current Co-op., September 1983.)

3) In some jursdictions, Co-operatives are not recognised by the State as a distinct organisational form; thus you have enterprises which are organsied along Co-operative lines (for example, observing the Rochdale Principles) which are nonetheless incorporated as - for example - a Friendly Society, Association, or LLC. For example, prior to - I think it was 1953 or 1954 - there was no Co-operatives Act in Victoria, even though Co-operatives had existed in the State since at least the 1870s; albeit incorporated under other Acts.

4) Similarly, in jursidictions where there is State recognition of Co-operatives as a distinct organisational form, there may be Co-operatives which, nonetheless, choose to incorporate themselves under other Acts. To cite one prominant example, the Murray Goulburn Co-operative (producers of the popular Devondale Brand of long life milk) is an Argricultural Producers' Co-operative which is nonetheless incorporated as a LLC. (in fact, Section 252 of Victoria's Co-operatives Act 1996 makes explicit provision for such arrangements: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/vic/consol_act/ca1996157/s252.html ).

There may, infact, be enough material (when you properly discuss different legal options for co-operatives, and the differences between different jurisdictions and countries in how co-operatives are recognised, and the relevant pieces of legislation), to branch off a Main Article fully discussing the issue. - AmishThrasher 11:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

i'm calling for a citation-finding drive to get rid of the 'no citation' banners at the top of Worker Cooperative. if you're interested in playing, i'd love to have you on board. -- frymaster 04:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I don't really have an opinion on whether strema or stremma is correct; I redirected because we should only have one article, and stremma was the older and better-developed article. If you think it should be moved to strema, feel free to suggest on the talk page. --Delirium 16:41, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Concerning your contribution, INSPIRE project, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.wiki.coop/index.php/SHCA (among other pages at this site, which are older and contain no notice of permission to copy). As a copyright violation, INSPIRE project appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. INSPIRE project has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:INSPIRE project and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:INSPIRE project with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:INSPIRE project.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. DMacks 19:39, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Cyfenter requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  M2Ys4U ^(talk) 22:41, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on ELWARE, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because ELWARE is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting ELWARE, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Allow me to point out some (and this being a very small sampling of some) of the problems here:

• (section header) "A SMASHING IDEA – WITH BENEFITS ALL ROUND"
• "has shown the way forward for...", "that forms part of the work of the HOT development partnership".
• "Contact details:" followed by detailed contact information.

Boosterism of anyone or anything is not allowed. If the article started out as a puff piece, like ELWARE was, and there is no neutral version to which to revert, it will be deleted. If you can write an article from sources which are both reliable and independent of the company or initiative or whatever it is, that's fine, but it must be neutrally written. Boosterism will result in deletion and eventually either a block or dose of salt. This is not the place to promote anyone or anything, and that's non-negotiable. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 07:48, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your note at Talk:Sunderland Home Care Associates. I have responded there with further steps necessary to verify permission for this material to be displayed on Wikipedia. I am watching that page, so please feel free to let me know there if you have any questions about the process. Thanks. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 20:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since the permissions process was not completed, the article has been deleted to ensure that we are compliant with copyright law. If you should return and wish to restore the text, please be sure that you either place a note at the site releasing it under the GFDL or released into the public domain or send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org (a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation would also serve) permitting re-use under the GFDL. There is a blanket release form here, which you can personalize to the situation. Currently the website's release, here, does not serve, as it permits reproduction only, and GFDL requires that it also permit modification. Once this is confirmed, the material can be restored. If you should send a permissions letter, the Communications Committee should restore the text. If you should choose rather to alter the notice on the original article, please feel free to drop me a note at my talk page or to approach another administrator to have the original article restored. Alternatively, you are welcome in that case also to recreate it, leaving a note at the article's talk page providing a link to the modified release. Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 18:51, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi TobyJ, moved image Image:CAP_Markt_Köpenick.JPG to Commons today for use in german CAP-market-article, Thx&greetings, -- Sandres 20:33 18. Aug. 2008 (CEST) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.0.232.89 (talk) 18:33, 18 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading File:Phonecoop.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 17:06, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Muther Grumble is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muther Grumble until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Osarius Talk 17:23, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Toby, thanks for your contribution to the Sassoon article. Just to mention, hyperlinks to websites are not set into the article text but only used in references or in the external links section. Happy editing and best wishes for the weekend. Span (talk) 11:35, 3 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Sustainable refurbishment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Insulation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. When you recently edited Stowarzyszenie Siemacha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tarnow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

A fair question. The conventions are linked to on Talk:Brussels: Wikipedia:WikiProject Belgium/Brussels naming conventions. To make a long story short, there was no uniformity in how naming things was treated, so we came up with a broad consensus to clarify how to treat this. If when reading them, you're wondering why it seems like Dutch is taking a back seat to French, it's because A) English speakers almost always use the French, and B) writing two names all the time was thought to be messy and inappropriate. The goal was still neutrality, but it's neutrality from an English speaker's point of view. If you have any questions, let me know. Cheers, Oreo Priest ^talk 19:39, 21 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited A Sixth Part of the World, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Samoyed and Kirghiz (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:59, 8 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BEEBUG is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BEEBUG until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — ṞṈ™ 00:43, 31 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. If you have access to any (non-online) material which refers to the magazine, it'd be very useful. Cheers. -- Trevj (talk) 12:36, 1 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lage Landen Lijn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ICE (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:33, 20 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I just came across INSPIRE project and am glad to see you are still active here after all these years. The article does not have an appropriate tone, fails to demonstrate notability and lacks sources, and I'm minded to propose deletion. The external website given doesn't seem to mention a project by that name. If the page should be kept, I imagine you'd know the best places to go for citations? – Fayenatic London 19:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

== Proposed deletion of INSPIRE project ==

 

The article INSPIRE project has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

notability not demonstrated, tagged as like advert since 2007

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 11:45, 23 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Batadorp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 13 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your upload of File:44 Mowbray Rd.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:14, 30 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colombian folklore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marimonda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 30 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Re your recent edit: Are you certain that this is the Turkish word for alley? Google translate gives 'street' and the Turkish Wikipedia article seems to support this, including the images. I had hoped to add an image of a Turkish alley. Rwood128 (talk) 15:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. TobyJ, thanks for creating MetroBus (Bristol)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article is written well. Perhaps you could choose some appropriate categories near the bottom of the article to help improve the overall article and make the article more easily searchable by wikipedia users. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 11:06, 2 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ralph Douglas Stacey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Habitus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 9 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bus lane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reading. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

- Ah but you didn't notice that I corrected it 5 minutes later, you silly robot! TobyJ (talk) 05:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MetroBus (Bristol) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MetroBus (Bristol) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010 • (talk) 15:39, 17 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Reserved track, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cobble. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Roxby, North Yorkshire, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -War wizard90 (talk) 01:42, 11 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Brussels tram route 81

added links pointing to Montgomery, Horta, Merode and Flagey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Small Firms Enterprise Development Initiative requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 12:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Small Firms Enterprise Development Initiative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small Firms Enterprise Development Initiative until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 12:27, 10 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Median strip, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages A10, A4 and E19. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 10 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on CAMRA Members' Investment Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Yintan  09:03, 19 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on ESIF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/european-structural-and-investment-funds_en. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:43, 25 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Your addition to European Social Fund has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 20:30, 26 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

The article WikiSummaries has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:09, 19 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Business and employment co-operative is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Business and employment co-operative until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. King of Scorpions 17:58, 7 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rizla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kingsize (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:42, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Van der Valk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page De Gooyer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:22, 7 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited RepaNet, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Audio, Cobbler and CV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Inside the Factory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 11 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thanks for creating the article, it brought back memories of my childhood that I'd forgotten about. Regards --John B123 (talk) 17:49, 13 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cistercians, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Connections.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malcolm MacDonald, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deutsches Jungvolk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Robert Harris.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, If the Dead Rise Not, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Gpkp [u • t • c] 16:09, 9 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Ushers.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused personal photo. Out of scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for contributing to the article WHSmith. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 18:36, 19 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

An article that been involved with (''Optare & Switch Mobility'' ) has content that is proposed to be removed and moved to another article (''Optare'' ''Switch Mobility''). If you are interested, please visit the discussion. Thank you. Bhor.sankalp (talk) 06:03, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Publications Distribution Cooperative, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. I did this rather than removing the uncited material in the article, which I felt would be more disruptive. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to ask on my talk page. When you have the required sourcing (and every assertion needs a source), and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:43, 30 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Community co-operatives in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:33, 18 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear TobyJ,

As a contributor to the 'Trams in Popular Culture' page you may be disturbed to learn that someone has proposed its deletion! To support the continuation of this page go to "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trams in popular culture". I thank you in anticipation of your assistance in retaining this useful page Albert Isaacs (talk) 23:47, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear TobyJ,

As a contributor to the 'Trams in Popular Culture' page you may be disturbed to learn that someone has proposed its deletion! To support the continuation of this page go to "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Trams in popular culture". I thank you in anticipation of your assistance in retaining this useful page Albert Isaacs (talk) 23:52, 6 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Dear Albert,

Thanks for the warning. I'm sorry I was too late to vote to keep. I have some sympathy with the deletionists as it had grown to include a lot of queestionably notable mentions (we started with Henry James and James Joyce). I think the best solution is for a smaller section to be recreated in the main 'Trams' article. TobyJ (talk) 08:20, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, TobyJ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Community co-operatives in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kálvin tér, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Belváros.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hello TobyJ! Your additions to Draft:Community co-operatives in the Highlands and Islands of Scotland have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

• Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
• Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
• Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
• Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ktkvtsh (talk) 23:11, 19 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Highlands and Islands Enterprise and Cooperative. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)Reply