RC-0722

You are kind to recognize my efforts. I was simply clicking on the "recent changes" link to find some things that looked like less-than-stellar edits, and the Jon Kitna article flashed up there. S. Dean Jameson (talk) 03:09, 26 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm glad you feel that way, but I do not encourage you to do so. It could get awkward... I warn you. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 00:59, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've made up my mind. I might be back, you know, but not under this username. I plead with you not to find my phone number and call me per the Privacy Policy ^{(and one of the amendments to the constitution -- US of A)}. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 01:14, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Well, it rather depends on my schedule. If I sit down and seriously write for something it'll be after summer, I suppose. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 16:23, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yo, check your e-mail. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.108.197.220 (talk) 15:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please accept this invitation to join Wikipedia:WikiProject United States Government. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 17:15, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 18:39, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The June 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 23:34, 1 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sent. Hope you can reply soon (I suppose your online since I just saw you on RC). --RyRy5 (talk) 04:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I left you a message at the wiki and your email. :) I was wondering where you went. --RyRy5 (talk) 04:27, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Check it!!! 130.108.196.229 (talk) 15:08, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

DO IT!!! 130.108.196.229 (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Check it!!!130.108.200.196 (talk) 16:26, 4 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Intentionally or not, you have already sabotaged this conversation once. If you want to talk to me on my talk page, please do not insert your comments in the middle of a discussion I am having with another editor. This is the second time I have made this request of you. Unschool (talk) 22:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

See my comments on Unschool's page, you have every right to post to his talk page. Unschool does not own his talk page, but rather the community does. This is also the second time I have warned Unschool about refactoring comments. - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 23:07, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just made a new post! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 22:42, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Have you been reading the blog? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 23:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looks like you broke your wrist. Will you still be editing Wikipedia? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 19:54, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Think you can write the June newsletter? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 19:20, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why would I be joking? - DiligentTerrier (and friends) 21:08, 15 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Hope your wrist gets better! - DiligentTerrier (and friends) has given you balloons! Balloons are meant to uplift the morale of people with an illness, and has hopefully made your day a little better. Spread good health by giving someone else who is a bit ill a balloon.

Spread the good health by adding {{subst:Balloons}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

- DiligentTerrier (and friends) 00:37, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Mission 4, a series of articles on the Everglades, could do with help from the FA-Team! Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 13:06, 16 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

• Thank you for volunteering for Mission 4 - Moni3 has helpfully constructed a "to do" list on our Mission 4! Let's start working! Awadewit (talk) 13:27, 19 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I logged on about 15 minutes ago, so I guess the bot hasn't gotten around to updating my status yet.   jj137 (talk) 22:02, 17 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm back... elisa^talk. 14:37, 18 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Star Wars Kid's name is, in fact, Ghyslain Raza.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/webguide/internetlife/2003-08-21-star-wars-kid_x.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.206.99.174 (talk) 01:17, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is extensive consensus that we are going to leave his name out of the article. Discuss on the article talk page if you wish to try and change this. FCYTravis (talk) 18:06, 22 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please note that when User:FCYTravis says "consensus", usually he means his own personal opinion. Although I agree with him that discussing on the article talk page is an excellent way to establish "consensus", Wikipedia is littered with Travis's statements of what "extensive consensus" is, that really amounts to nothing more than his own personal opinion. See Talk:Nigel McGuinness for a prime example. Reswobslc (talk) 20:21, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Just to let you know I had a flip through your contributions this morning. All looks pretty good to me. A few questions - are you still enjoying Wikipedia? What areas are you particularly enjoying working in? What are you hoping to work on next? Pedro :  Chat  07:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Draining and development of the Everglades, which in the end we decided not to rename "Complete land rape of South Florida", has achieved FA status! Congratulations and thanks all around! Two down and three to go - head for those copyediting and peer-reviewing parties at Restoration of the Everglades, Geography and ecology of the Everglades and Everglades! Awadewit (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

• The Everglades have been saved! Just kidding! Seriously, though, big changes are afoot, as reported by our own Moni3 at Wikinews. These developments have prompted a dramatic increase in traffic to the articles, so let's do Wikipedia proud and spruce them up pronto! Awadewit (talk) 15:35, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hmm... good question. I would say if the owner of the userpage considered the edit to be vandalism since it wasn't really helping, then yes, it would be vandalism, although I'm probably wrong.   jj137 (talk) 22:22, 24 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Sort of... the first part made sense but then I kind of lost you.   jj137 (talk) 02:55, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

You have repeatedly used the article subject's name in the discussion about whether using the name in the article is OK or not.

As the BLP policy explicitly says, some aspects of the policy (including the privacy issues) apply to talk pages as well as article pages.

The name has been removed repeatedly by several administrators. Please stop including it there. You are welcome to discuss the issue without using the name. Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 03:33, 25 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Looking through some real old stuff...aren't the dates here strange at the very least? Any explanation for that? Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 08:40, 26 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

As you found on Diligent Terrier's talk page, I have requested to be co-adopted. I did mean you, and I hope you will be a great co-adoptor.--LAAFan 20:25, 27 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have three questions for you. This is your first experience as my adopter, so I hope all goes well.

1. I've been looking around and seeing Account Creator Rights. I clicked on the link, but, in my opinion, it wasn't helpful. What exactly does an Account Creator do? I'm intrigued.

2. How exactly are bots run? I would like to run one, but that depends on how hard it is to create one; I can be low-key when it comes to technology.

3. My former adopter (WikiZorro) was going to tell me about user scripts. Since he retired, it never came to be. Yesterday, I finally went and installed basic Twinkle and Friendly. Are there some advanced user scripts I should know about?--LAAFan 17:11, 2 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I see you were listed as a participant in the League of Copy-Editors so it seems likely. The thing is the Military history wikiproject urgently needs prose pros to help with our best articles. Milhist covers a broad range of interesting and varied subjects from film to biography, battles to weaponry, and Roman emperors to twentieth-century dictators. In Milhist, A-Class has become the last port of call before FAC and we are looking for people to help identify prose and MoS issues at A-Class A-Class Reviews and help fix them prior to featured article candidacy. We also have a copy-editing section in our Logistics Dept and that can always use experienced copy-editors. For most of our articles, you don't need to be a specialist in the subject matter, just good with words.

If you think you can help, please do! Thanks for your time, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 07:53, 3 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

First, thank you very much for responding to the call. I'm sorry it's taken a bit of time to get back to you but I've got the builders in at home (and they're causing chaos) and I've got very behind.

Second, we need help on a couple of levels. we are so short of good copy-editors, partly because of the large number of Milhist articles at PR and FAC, that we're trying to concentrate on A-Class reviews and featured article candidates. I've taken the liberty of transcluding our new tracker template, listing the applicable articles. To add this to your user pages independently of this message, simply cut and paste {{WPMILHIST Copy-editing alerts}} to the required location.

A-Class - copy-tasting / reviewing

We are currently trying to improve the depth and quality of the Milhist A-Class review. What will help here considerably is copy-tasting. That is, reviewing an article and commenting on the style and prose. Clarity, longwindedness (the bane of Milhist), grammar, mixing and matching WP:ENGVAR varieties, MoS stuff (especially dashes), date formatting etc. (Any subsequent copy-editing would be a very welcome and helpful bonus!) Input on any current A-Class candidate would be helpful.

Copy-editing pre-FA and FA candidates

Editors normally take articles go from ACR to FAC, usually via a request for a copy-edit. These requests are usually made here or by leaving messages on copy-editors talk pages. You can respond to requests there or list yourself as a copy-editor so that others may contact you. Either would be very much appreciated. Additionally, a frequent reason for opposition is prose and some hands-on copy-editing of FA candidates would be enormously helpful. (If you do subsequently support the article, please do remember to disclose the copy-edit: ie Support (as copy-editor) though you may prefer simply to Comment that a copy-edit has been done.)

I do hope you can help and that this grows into a longer-term commitment. We are working very hard to set the bar for quality with Milhist articles and quality copy-editing is an essential part of this. With apologies again for the tardy reply, --ROGER DAVIES ^talk 05:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The July 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:39, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Way to go team! Restoration of the Everglades has just become an FA! Three down and two to go! Geography and ecology of the Everglades and Everglades could use your eagle eyes! Awadewit (talk) 16:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Please comment on the current FA-Team proposals. Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 16:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, man. Long time no talk. Just wanted to update you on the fact that I've nominated Joe Delaney for A-class status, and both List of Kansas City Chiefs head coaches and Kansas City Chiefs seasons for Featured list status. I've added a whole bunch of Chiefs pictures on articles too, like the Chiefs' main article to make it look spiffy. If all of these articles pass, hopefully I'll be starting up the Chiefs' WikiProject in full force if you were still interested (you were really the only other person truly helping in the effort). Hope you're having a good summer and so on. Take care. conman33 (. . .talk) 04:48, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Indigenous people of the Everglades region, Draining and development of the Everglades and Restoration of the Everglades have all recently become FAs! King Arthur is now at FAC! Thanks to our hard-working team members! Awadewit (talk) 18:22, 6 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi RC-0722

Could you please specify your level of copy-editing for the military history project here.

These are the levels:

1. Copy-edit lite: basic proof-reading, spellchecking, punctuation.
2. English variant conversion: for example, from American English to Commonwealth English, or vice versa.
3. Naturalising: copy-edit for editors whose English is fluent but not perfect.
4. FAC prose copy-edit: flow, structure, elegance.
5. FAC technical copy-edit: MoS-compliance for dashes, hard spaces, numbers, measurement conversion.

Thanks a lot. Wandalstouring (talk) 12:21, 10 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The military history article on William Johnstone Hope needs some editing for structure flow and elegance. I would be glad if you could do that. Otherwise it is a good article and I would nominate it for A-class. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 12:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hope had been a lieutenant for several years at that time.Wandalstouring (talk) 07:28, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

To clarify, Hope was already a lieutenant but was specially requested by Hughes to be lieutenant on board Hughes's ship HMS Adamant. (and sorry for reverting something you did in the middle of a copyedit, Wandalstouring hadn't told me at that point that he'd requested you have a look. I do think that section is rather short though and would do better incorporated somehow with the one below it.) --Jackyd101 (talk) 07:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

In another note, please see the talk page per your removal of redlinks to ships. The ships wikiproject is steadily working its way through these red links and as such it is not particularly helpful or useful to remove them just because they aren't blue right now. I myself have been filling in these redlinks and had these on my to do list, so please could you restore them unless there is an actionable reason why they should be removed.--Jackyd101 (talk) 08:46, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

I think its best they go back now, it will save time later and the article doesn't need them delinking. If the new articles aren't created by someone with a connection to this article then they won't know there is a need to create the new articles unless the red links already exist.--Jackyd101 (talk) 18:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I think your other edits on the article have all been good ones, keep it up.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:13, 16 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you consider my work on Cy Young substantially enough for me to nominate for GA? I don't have a lot of edits to it, but I copyedited the entire article and added about 8 references.--LAAFan 01:08, 18 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello there!

I have begun laying the groundwork for a new WikiProject that has a very simple goal, to improve Wikipedia by dealing with the articles tagged for copy edit, and I am wondering if you are interested in helping me start it. This project is not a clone of WP:LOCE because we will not deal with requests for review (that is currently handled by our good friends over at Peer Review).

I expect that this will be a relaxed, happy and casual WikiProject, because participants will be able to take things at their own pace and use the project page to ask other participants for help. The project proposal is here, and I have created an almost-functional project page in my userspace here.

There are now over 4000 articles needing copy edit, and very, very few people working on them, so any help, however small, is appreciated. If you are interested, please sign up at the proposal page. Once we have enough people, I will shift the project page, along with its subpages from my userspace into the Wikipedia namespace. For now we can use this section of my talk page to discuss the direction and details of the project, and, of course, its name. *grin*

Cheers!-Samuel Tan 12:35, 21 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the support! The project page is now up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles Needing Copy Edit. It's now a bit bland 'cos there are no pretty pictures yet heh... Feel free to sign up there, and discuss details and direction and what not at its talk page. I'll be sending out invitations to the members of WP:Grammar, and later WP:LOCE and maybe WP:PR. Cheers! -Samuel Tan 03:13, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oops! Your name wasn't updating on the participants list cos of a silly coding error. *bonks head* Fixed now! See you at the project page. :)Samuel Tan 07:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

--LAAFan 23:41, 24 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi RC-0722,

As an FA-Team member, I'm soliciting your assistance with FA-Team Mission 5 on Scattered disc and Solar energy (and possibly others). Your expertise on layout and style would be much appreciated. Please sign up on the mission page and watchlist the mission page and articles if you are interested in helping out. Geometry guy 15:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kimu,

You're more experienced and may know of a way for Wikipedians to communicate privately, so I apologize in advance about a personal communication. (Feel free to delete it at your leisure.)

I've tried to circumspectly express a concern that the Expelled movie is so deceitful, it hurts the cause of people who believe in creationism. To me, it's like Stein said, "We can't make our point honestly, so we'll fall back on lying."

If they had simply stated their beliefs, I would have been supportive, but they chose not to do that. They opted for dishonesty.

Put another way, I hope to visit the Creation Museum some day, but in the meantime, I like to imagine they present in a positive manner with exhibits and evidence that says, "This is what we believe," instead of Expelled's approached of "This is what we want you to believe those awful God-hating Hitlerian scientists believe." (Notice the Creation Museum page is NOT listed as propaganda.)

Do you see the difference in what I'm saying?

blessed be, --UnicornTapestry (talk) 04:24, 30 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

The August 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 19:28, 1 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Félix Houphouët-Boigny needs to be copyedited and peer reviewed. We would appreciate any and all help from the crack members of the FA-Team! Sign up here. Merci! Awadewit (talk) 12:14, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Will you copyedit Washington State Route 531's Route description section so it can become a A-Class article? ~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 17:53, 7 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, RC-0722. You have new messages at ComputerGuy890100's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~~ ĈőмρǖтέŗĠύʎ890100 (t ↔ Ĕ ↔ ώ) 01:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I'm not sure exactly how to put this, but how far would you say I am from graduating from the adoption program? My plan is get an experienced adoption. Almost Admin Coaching, but not because the wait is so long. If you would like to put me through some sort of trial, to make sure that I am ready, feel free to do so. I feel I'm ready to graduate from the adoption program. I'll send this to Diligent Terrier also. Cheers.--LAAFan 15:32, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok. No rush... you retired?--LAAFan 21:15, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Scratch that. That was a vandal.--LAAFan 21:17, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Scratch that again. You are retiring?--LAAFan 22:23, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wow, you're on. :) Burner0718 22:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Found this link on Chris Nelson's userpage. LOL. Burner0718 23:01, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

RC-0722 asked me to put up the retirement banner on his userpage. :( Please, no one remove it. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 20:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

That's too bad. Did he gave any reason about why he retired? Cheers, Face 22:08, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, he just told me he's retired. He will check his talk page most everyday though. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 22:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok. I see you have already told Elisa, and I have notified his other two adoptees as well. Should his entry also be removed from this page? Cheers, Face 08:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Don't mean to put any pressure on you, but Diligent Terrier let me graduate, so I'm just waiting on you right now. Let me know what you decide. Cheers.--LAAFan 20:53, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

		The Adopt-a-User Barnstar
		For making this adoption a great experience, I, LAAFan, award you the adoptor's barnstar --LAAFan 03:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

• sigh* To bad the adoption couldn't last longer, but I felt I was ready to graduate. See you around the wiki. Cheers.--LAAFan 03:13, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I wish you all the best. Basketball110 ^{My story}/_{Tell me yours} 22:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Elisa, one of your adoptees, has stated that she wishes to speak to you. Cheers, Face 14:13, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

You unretired? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 01:13, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome back. :) GlassCobra 01:51, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Yeah. They (not me) removed the word "homophobic" from Fred Phelps, so my Mom likes WP again. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 02:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

If thats all it took, I woulda done that. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:16, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The problem is that that would've sparked an edit war. Read the discussion on the talk page. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 02:21, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ah, I see now. Do you now reply on your talk page? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:25, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

No, I did this just because there were two of u. RC-0722 ^361.0/1 02:30, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:35, 19 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wutsapinin? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 05:07, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I adopted User:Freshmenz tonight. Did you check the super test wiki? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 05:14, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Oh, ok. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 05:16, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

wow, you scared me. i thought youd left us lol. youre one of the only sane ones here ha. elisa^talk. 20:25, 20 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Check this out. lol. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:20, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I laughed at first (duh) but it started getting old. Maybe it was Weird Al! Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 02:24, 22 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I can try. The picture in his infobox seems to be the only one around. I might have something from him playing in a game, and I might get some pictures from this season once it starts up. I'll tell you if I do. conman33 (. . .talk) 20:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

The September 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:52, 1 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

There is a minor computational error on line 5 in the article on Water. The figure 10-21 (i.e. 10 to the 21st power) GRAMS should actually be 10-21 KILOGRAMS, or else 10-24 GRAMS.

I can't figure out how to contact someone who could actually (check up on this and) make this correction, since editing is denied. If I start a talk page, under this article, would this ever be seen, and the correction made? Because no-one is going to read all the talk pages on an article when they just need to see the article.

How could I get this correction made, and for future reference, how can this be done on a blocked article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowellcf (talk • contribs) 00:23, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Wutsapnin? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:03, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

What do you need help with on LJ's article? Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'm as lost as you are with that. lol. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 04:32, 5 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your memorial to 9/11 is awesome. Burner0718 ^{Jibba Jabba!} 21:26, 11 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

It was sort of a borderline thing; I was just trying to make the point--obviously badly--that Brady was apparently able to "walk off" the field. Samer (talk) 04:57, 8 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi RC: Can you identify what exactly you're looking to see updated in this article? You've tagged it without giving any explanation of what you think is missing... MeegsC | Talk 18:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for checking; I've been slowly trying to add sources for information (been a while since I've had time to do much), so it's on my watchlist. By the way, I laughed out loud at your "zen of sarcasm" section—great stuff! MeegsC | Talk 07:58, 15 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I forgot to respond to your message about game logs. I'll try and work on them, I'm not very good at it, but I'll probably take a couple days to gather sources and write a good one. I'm real busy as usual, but of course I'm going to write them eventually. conman33 (. . .talk) 21:41, 22 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help, the mod worked Perfectly!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Grey Leader (talk • contribs) 17:30, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

How do I submit an article for inclusion in the biography section of Wikipedia?(Observerrelate (talk) 07:56, 5 October 2008 (UTC))Reply

The October 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:15, 6 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

A friendly reminder from the Adopt-a-User project =)

Hey there RC-0722! This is a friendly reminder to update your status at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User/Adoptee's Area/Adopters whenever it is appropriate in order to provide new users with the most up-to-date information on available adopters. Also please note that we will be removing adopters who have not edited in 60 days. If you become active again (and we hope you do!) please feel free to re-add yourself. Cheers!

• Notice delivery by xenobot 14:30, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Hi RC. Sorry it's taken me some time to get back to you. I've had a plough (plow?) though your recent contributions this morning. On the whole everything looks good to me. I did notice there were a few times when you reverted vandalism but didn't warn the IP. It's minor but by adding the warning it hopefuly stops bad edits in their tracks or helps at WP:AIV if it gets that far to ensure they have been warned. But that really is a minor quibble as more often than not you do warn as well as revert. Other than that really positive work - really really positive. Far more impressive main space contributions than me! Pedro :  Chat  07:39, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Do u have a ps3--DCsniper207 (talk) 21:35, 23 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi.actually as u may guess,i'm an amateur.so could you please guide me with some basics of wiki?D3m (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi.can u plz adopt me

hi.can u plz adopt me--D3m (talk) 15:22, 28 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

They are facts. That is why. Mighty Ducks 4 was supposed to be released 4 years ago, but it hasn't come out.(Planecrash111 (talk) 04:48, 1 November 2008 (UTC))Reply

— pd_THOR ^{| =/\=} | 06:36, 6 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Read.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 05:56, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

To tell you the truth I dont know, I think it was a mistake, I dont know what I was doing--Yankees10 06:27, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, um, I didn't expect Chris to reply to that too, so since there are two of you I will reply here. First off, Chris, please note the time that article I cited was written. Second, Yankees10, no problem happens to me all the time. :) Kimu 14:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Actually, the reports of Law playing safety and corner were from right when the news broke. It's been in pretty much every article covering it. So the specific one I posted here is irrelevant, it'd be reported about his positions since the news came out.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 18:01, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Um, Chris, what does that have to do with this post? Kimu 18:59, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Everything?►Chris Nelson^Holla! 20:00, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Not necessarily, especially since we were discussing Yankees10 edit, no whether or not Law plays safety and corner. However, there is a thread on that topic on the the article's talk page. Kimu 20:28, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

I made this section ABOUT Law's position. If anything was out of place, it was Yankees10's post.►Chris Nelson^Holla! 20:53, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

What?--Yankees10 22:51, 11 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Holy freaking crap. This is not complicated. Here's a timeline:

• I add Safety to Law's infobox and article because he was quoted as saying he'll do both for the Jets
• RC reverted because he failed to read. His edit summary asked for someone to prove him wrong.
• I came here to prove him wrong and did.
• RC still failed to read apparently, reverted again and took it to the talk page, wasting everyone's time by simply not reading.
• RC acted as if my comments here were out of place, despite the face I created this very topic. I pointed out that Yankees10 comments, if anyone's, were out of place and not my own since I made this topic.
• RC still apparently has not read. God help us all.

►Chris Nelson^Holla! 21:58, 12 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

hi... i'm a medico from India.have quite some information on few subjects.m contributing as i find on time for it.... there're quite many baffling options around on the pages :-). i don't even know anything about adoption or how to effect upon it...so primarily,could me guide on it.thanking you in anticipation.--D3m (talk) 08:03, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

its me again.asking things... :) how do i accecp ur adoption???--D3m (talk) 09:07, 14 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

i dont get why people wouldnt like you a whole lot is because of video games or something--DCsniper207 (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

thats kind of stupid--DCsniper207 (talk) 00:55, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

do you have a lot of friends--DCsniper207 (talk) 23:49, 2 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

The December 2008 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
Automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:02, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

which consoles do you have--DCsniper207 (talk) 23:49, 3 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

i have a PS3--DCsniper207 (talk) 01:29, 10 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

The January 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 03:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

TomCat4680 (talk) has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

TomCat4680 (talk) 14:47, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello. :) Since you have been involved in editing the article Spider-Man, I wanted to let you know that we have nominated the article for "Good Article" status. You can view the review page, and if there is anything you can do to make the article better, please do so. :) There are a number of concerns to be addressed and some work to be done, so pitch in if you are able, make any suggestions that you think might be helpful, or at least just be there for moral support. :) BOZ (talk) 00:44, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the help!  :) Any help is appreciated. BOZ (talk) 21:20, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

The February 2009 issue of the College football WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:10, 11 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

bibliomaniac15 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend, Go on smile! Cheers, and Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

I haven't seen you around in ages. How're you doing, mate?

Not much really. Real life is getting busy, so I'm working more with maintenance tasks around here. bibliomaniac15 19:48, 8 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Dear Nernst,

You may recognize me from the tonometry posts, specifically regarding Diaton tonometer.

I would like to bring to your attention that Diaton tonometer is a new and unique device that measures IOP through the eyelid - this is NOT a Proview Phosphine and works by a completely different method vs. what you have described and yet again corrected my adjustments to the post.

I have also looked over your other valuable contributions to wikipedia and am assured that this is a simple misunderstanding, vs. vandalism.

I would also like to voice that I am very familiar with this tonometry matter and a procedure and have been involved in a number of clinical trials related to this breakthrough technology.

I would like to respectfully request not to alter my addition being I have spent many hours to back up all the contents with clinical trials and other credible information.

If you would like to see this unique device in action I am inviting you to ARVO - Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology - where myself and a number of MEEI glaucoma specialists will be presenting our incredible findings based on our clinical trials.

If you would like, I would be glad to elaborate more and provide any other required information about Diaton tonometer.

I thank you in advance, ^DA —Preceding unsigned comment added by ^DevelopAll (talk • contribs) 06:42, 23 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hi Kimu,

Thank you for your warm welcome when I first started editing.

I'm still getting used to wikipedia but am happy when I can make a useful contribution.

Thanks for passing on that last message. It would be useful if I could reply to the chap who sent it.

Can you tell me how to do this ?

All the best

Ali (Nernst) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nernst (talk • contribs) 18:48, 2 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are listed as a GA reviewer. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:30, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

		WikiProject Vancouver
		You have been invited to participate in Operation Schadenfreude to restore the article Vancouver back to featured article status.

- Dear FA Team member, we could use your help if you're available. Mkdw^talk 06:41, 30 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Hello RC-0722! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 4 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Chris Widener - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 05:19, 17 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, RC-0722! You are receiving this message because you are on WikiProject Homeschooling's list of members. WikiProject Homeschooling is holding a roll call to identify active members. All members will be listed under "Pending". Please move your name to "Active" or "Inactive" based on your ability or interest in contributing to the project. After two weeks all names still listed under "Pending" will be moved to "Inactive". If you are actively interested in participating, we are in the process of trying to revive the project and would welcome any help. Discussion can be found at the project talk page. Cheers! 21:00, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the {{copyedit}} tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ ^Talk! 15:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated User:RC-0722/Metabee's favorite tree for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Nextil/:D. Cunard (talk) 04:25, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

User:RC-0722/Medabots, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:RC-0722/Medabots and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:RC-0722/Medabots during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 12:15, 16 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hello, RC-0722! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 21:21, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

I was looking at the article on Tahiti, and in many paragraphs there is a lot of strange code of some kind that appears to be active links, but aren't correct... and which I don't understand and am reluctant to remove. It's obviously some kind of consistent error on the page, not vandalism. Can you take the time to look at that article and see what I mean, and give me a hint as to what all that is, and if it can be safely removed?? -- thanks for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowellcf (talk • contribs) 20:33, 24 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Rowellcf (talk) 04:03, 20 November 2015 (UTC)Hello - please let me know if there's a policy concerning internal Wikipedia links to other Wikipedia articles, but which are irrelevant to an article's topic. Should they be removed?Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

 Template:WP Kansas City Chiefs subproject has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 06:31, 4 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:34, 2 October 2023 (UTC)Reply