Pyraminxsolver

  Hello, Pyraminxsolver. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Google Stadia, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:01, 29 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Pyraminxsolver. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Amar Bharati".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited AI boom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page 2023 Titan submersible incident, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:31, 22 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Nuclear Rabbit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 2A00:23EE:1998:5351:3538:BEA:A5C2:62D9 (talk) 12:35, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Nuclear Rabbit, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. 2A00:23EE:1998:5351:3538:BEA:A5C2:62D9 (talk) 12:43, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nuclear Rabbit, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of books considered the best, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 05:43, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of books considered the best, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 9 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of books considered the best, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Percy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:11, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of books considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of books considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

❯❯❯ Chunky aka Al Kashmiri (✍️) 17:42, 16 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Pyraminxsolver,

Thank you for creating Killer symbol.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Only one of the sources cited uses the term "killer symbol," and even then it does so in quotes. Are there any sources that can be added to demonstrate this term itself is actively used or understood?

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|FULBERT}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

FULBERT (talk) 13:43, 18 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Finke Desert Race, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 04:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killer symbol is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killer symbol until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Deauthorized. ^(talk) 00:52, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

lizthegrey (talk) 01:24, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

i know Pyraminxsolver (talk) 01:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

oh you're that person... Pyraminxsolver (talk) 23:01, 7 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Pyraminxsolver. Could you please elaborate on the meaning of this comment? Thanks. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 02:49, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

except for my observation that the world is indeed quite small and sometimes that fact will surprise me, and that my personal viewpoints don't disrupt how i edit and i look at facts, i'll disacknowledge any comments requesting further testimony as i don't wish to incriminate myself. Pyraminxsolver (talk) 03:02, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this isn't going to be a recurring thing, then I won't press the matter. However, could you please amend the part of your comment that misgenders Lizthegrey? -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 03:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

	The Original Barnstar
	2023 Optus outage is a good page. Well done! Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I agree! And thank you and all the other contributors involved. -106.70.91.181 (talk) 03:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC).Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Game Awards 2023, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 03:42, 8 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 outstation murder-suicide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 outstation murder-suicide until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

duffbeerforme (talk) 12:45, 18 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your edits at My War have been reverted now more than once, and not just by me. Your archiving of the talk page was obviously not for maintenance, but to attempt to clear the way for more of your tendentious edits. You make your bad faith the more obvious when you reverted my edit at Johnny Ramone to restore an unsourced, obviously counterfactual statement with the gibberish rationale "unsourced removal". There's no way to justify that edit.

Are you trying to provoke people? If you don't stop, the above is more than enough evidence to request a block. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 20:38, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

no comment Pyraminxsolver (talk) 08:37, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nobody wants a comment. You'll stop, or there will be consequences. Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 22:35, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

off topic question, but what is with the ip that edited my page? are you editing pages outside of your username or is this a mistake with you not logging in or genuine sockpuppetry (without ill intent) Pyraminxsolver (talk) 04:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I was logged out when I commented. Where's the mystery? I fixed my sig—what sockpuppet does that? Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 06:01, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Pyraminxsolver. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "List of books considered the best".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:01, 18 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Graveland, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:02, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Graveland. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Stop whitewashing the article to remove citations and content in the lead. There is no policy or guideline that prevents articles from having "too many citations". Your edit was reverted; stop edit warring and discuss it on the talk page. WP:PRESERVE is pretty clear that content that is imperfect should not be removed simply because you think it may be imperfectly presented. Perhaps there are so many citations because people like you keep whitewashing the article and removing this content? If you stop edit warring to remove it, maybe someone will prune down the number of citations. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:27, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

And come on: what is Special:Diff/1214491049? You doing the same exact thing? So, it's OK for you to add excessive citations, but not OK for anyone else? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 13:29, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Pyraminxsolver, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, IPad kid, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IPad kid.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Dan Leonard}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dan • ✉ 13:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Your opinion on this issue is requested

You have been tagged to this conversation because you may have previously participated in similar discussions and there has been a notable development. Please consider sharing your views.
𝓣𝓱𝓮 𝓔𝓭𝓾𝓬𝓪𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷 𝓐𝓾𝓭𝓲𝓽𝓸𝓻 06:14, 19 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I see you edited that a bunch of leaked messages were put on GitHub. Do you have a link to those or have they been archived somewhere? As I write this theres probably an effort to take down that repository. ItzSwirlz (talk) 16:06, 8 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I referenced that using a reliable sources, but the messages can be found here https://kiwifarms(.)st/threads/ava-chris-tyson-christopher-stephen-tyson-christine-tyson-chris-the-meme-god.163381/page-353#post-18950485 Pyraminxsolver (talk) 00:19, 9 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Club Q shooting CCTV.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)Reply