Sengkang

Hi. I noticed that you reverted a rather large expansion to the flower article today using popups (see [1]). While the expansion was in much need of wikification, it certainly wasn't vandalism, and reverting it without explanation or an attempt to keep valuable material therein will only serve to drive away new editors. I've only glanced over the 10kb addition, but at least some of it would provide depth the article lacks right now. I don't have time to deal with it at the moment, but thought I'd at least point it out to you as I'm assuming (or hoping) you didn't realize what you were doing. NoahElhardt 05:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok, noted. I suspect copyvio, please revert as you see it fit. Tks. —Sengkang 06:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

No one seems to be putting any warning messages in the indian ocean pests talk box - any reason do you think? SatuSuro 01:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I put a warning anyway. SatuSuro 01:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok, thanks. —Sengkang 02:09, 16 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Whale commercial - every edit by that one is a commercial link! SatuSuro 07:39, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

In WP:TTthere is a Welcomespam message - it looks good! SatuSuro 08:05, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Welcome spam mesg? —Sengkang 08:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Heheh :) see - Template:TestTemplates - under the second black heading line fifth way down the page ! SatuSuro 08:15, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh Ok, thanks. —Sengkang 08:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Its going on so Ive alerted an admin SatuSuro 08:23, 17 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've got confused about who is right and who is wrong at Souther Ocean - any idea? SatuSuro 03:58, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

hmm...I can't establish who's "right" or "wrong", since it's essentially about nonmenclature and there will always be bones for contention. —Sengkang 04:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh well I'll leave it but if it goes much more it becomes a 3RR war... sigh SatuSuro 04:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Alabama Metropolitan Areas, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. AlaGuy 23:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

I would like to know why you removed my comment about the size of the universe versus its age. I tried to make it sound as factual and neutral as I could. Distance, time, and velocity are related, so it's difficult to say that an object traveled 45 billion lightyears in only at-most 20 billion years. It would have been polite for you to leave a comment as to where I'm wrong in my logic. I'm always open to learning something new, and so I would enjoy having someone show me how the universe could be larger than the speed of light would allow. 71.209.28.76 04:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalized this page with racist remarks, just giving you a heads up. Carlo V. Sexron 03:22, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Noted, thanks. And thanks to all for the reversion. —Sengkang 03:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello my friend! I noticed you created many articles about islands of Singapore. Just informing you that they are badly sorted in the category. All should be sorted by their name (excluding the word pulau). Regards. - Darwinek 11:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

hi, i know that you have edited the YJc article by cancelling the controversy part that i have typed. Could you please give me a reason why you removed it? I am merely stating the facts and there should be transparency. I dont know whether you are from a rival school, but i suggest you should maintain your neutrality. Otherwise, i will have to bring this issue to a person of equivalent rank as you,being a wikipedia member -17:59, February 8, 2007 Nerdbrain456

Pl cite your sources since you claim they are facts. Thank you. —Sengkang 10:03, 8 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

But then,this facts are said by the principal of my school, and i only knew them this year>?so the only source would be my principal lo.I cant find any such source on the internet man.besides if you think in a logical manner,my facts are true lo. - 11:22, February 9, 2007 Nerdbrain456

Pl note that articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Sources should be appropriate to the claims made: exceptional claims require stronger sources. What is said by the Principal constitutes his or her Point of View and may be biased. Pl read Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:NPOV for more information. Thank you. —Sengkang 03:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 15 February, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Old Admiralty House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Per your revert at Saturn, the same IP is modifying other planets similarly. Perhaps they all need to be reverted? —Wknight94 (talk) 14:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, pl revert as you see it fit. My hands are tied for the moment. Tks. —Sengkang 14:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

He Sengkang, I sent you an email, but maybe you're busy. I was wondering why you reverted [2] - as you don't seem to have left any explanation. If like with the Flower revert, you are suspecting copyvio, I can assure you that is not the case, as I created the video content being referenced myself. The Clarke Whale Museum on Pico Azores has many useful exhibits on sperm whales and giant squid, and in the interviews (of which there are 5 on the referenced external page) Prof. Malcolm Clarke discusses and shows us around the museum, and talks in depth about the anatomy of sperm whales (which he has studied for about 40 years). The films also include footage of the lifesize sculpture of the largest whale ever caught in the Azores.

- 04:54, February 23, 2007 Notreallyrelevant

Ok. —Sengkang 01:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello Sengkang, I noticed that your revert using popups of Venus introduced bogus content. See this diff. Do you have any idea how this happened? Seems like a bug in the popup tool. WilliamKF 05:19, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I think there is a bug in the popups tool. —Sengkang 06:22, 2 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your patience in reverting bloodyminded vandals is appreciated, noticed and although I have given up on barnstars - well done, thank you and may you be rewarded in some way for your tireless efforts! SatuSuro 01:00, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. —Sengkang 01:01, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading Image:Kusu island.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Denniss 13:00, 18 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi there. Could you please take a look at this diff? Neilnat's edit summary doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. However, it sounds plausible (at least grammatically), and if it is vandalism it was apparently never caught. I would just add the deleted stuff back in myself, but I don't know how. Any help would be appreciated. Thanks. ≈≈Carolfrog≈≈♦тос♦ 01:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello. I'm in agreement with the recent revert you made on Astronomy. Not sure if you already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit was inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Best regards, Belovedfreak 09:32, 24 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes i know. Thanks. —Sengkang 03:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Use WP:TWINKLE, it will open a new window after reverting the vandal. Its very useful. There are extra tabs and you just select from there. If you want to report, its also very easy, you just need to click the report tab. Just copy the script to your monobook. Terence 09:50, 27 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I presume TW cannot be used concurrently with popups. Popups is already causing crashes when I use Firefox. Any similar problems with TW? —Sengkang 02:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

TW is better than popups. TW doesn't crash at all, albeit sometimes the TW tabs do not work. However, its still okay and at least you can still revert even though the tabs do not work. This is for my desktop only. And TW does not work for IE. Terence 04:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

User talk:71.202.76.185 re:Bee edit:

I saw your reversion of an edit but noticed you didn't place a msg on the talk page. I placed a note on the IP's talk page. Thanks for catching the edit, but pls also leave a msg on the talk page. I got mine from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism#Warnings

Thx, SteinAlive | ☎ | ☉ 04:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I see you removed the following statements from the PAP wikipedia entry: "PAP politicians make extensive use of Singapore's libel laws to silence and bankrupt opposition politicians."

Not sure why you did this since it is known worldwide that the PAP use the S'pore libel laws to bankrupt their critics. 212.58.233.129 20:50, May 21, 2007

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 166.121.37.12 lifted or expired. Sorry for the trouble! Request handled by: – Luna Santin (talk) 07:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. —Sengkang 07:59, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please don't place everything under Cat:Sentosa Express and Cat:Sentosa and Cat:Southern Islands --> C:Sentosa Express is already in C:Sentosa, which is in C:Southern Islands. Jpatokal 09:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Southern Islands is the planning area for all geographical locations in Sentosa, a move similar to the categorisation of all locations under the other 54 planning areas in Singapore. This is similar to what has been done for places along Orchard Road, where a separate generic category has been created for all places along Orchard Road, and another created for all locations under the Orchard Planning Area. The former specifies the generic geographical location "Orchard Road" while the latter the planning area "Orchard" aka "Orchard Planning Area" as per the Urban Redevelopment Authority. Same for Chinatown and Tanjong Pagar, where locations can fall under the distinct planning areas of Downtown Core or Outram. This makes the locating of places in the Southern Islands Planning Area easier. Hope this clarifies. Hence, it is not redundant per se in that the separate categories serve different purposes. Thanks. —Sengkang 01:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Y	Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s): Autoblock of 166.121.37.12 lifted or expired. You're definitely unlucky... Request handled by: -- lucasbfr talk 11:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. —Sengkang 01:12, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

		The Barnstar of Good Humour and patience
		Wikipedia needs those who can keep up with the plodding through the piles of vandalism - and you fit the bill perfectly. Keep up the good work!

If I ever get back to Singapore (was there last year in April) - I owe you a meal on the river for your hard work and patience with constant vandalism- cheers! SatuSuro 01:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! —Sengkang 15:55, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi,

In April and June you were reverting the edits of User:Cibwins on a variety of articles. He/she is back on wikipedia, now adding spuirous bondage links to a variety of pages and creating biographies of non-notable officers in the Singapore army (the former bothers me more, I've prodded or speedied several of the latter). Thought you might be interested.

WLU 13:56, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok, will take a look into it. Thanks. —Sengkang 15:24, 4 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 13 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The New 7th Storey Hotel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 20:04, 13 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On July 16, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Little (department store), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Good to see you back at DYK again. Good job!Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:23, 16 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, you reverted The Moon, removing my section about the smell of the moon. There is no reason I can see that would make this valid. The information was not false, it's 100% true. It's interesting and is no way vandalism. Can I ask why you did? - Jamiepgs 03:28, July 15, 2007

Citation added; case closed. Thank you for your concern. —Sengkang 06:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have nominated Gray Wolf for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. DrKiernan 13:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

You recently removed some vandalism from Eris (dwarf planet), saying, in your edit summary, that the vandalism had been posted by me. I would never do such a thing, and would like to know why I am accused of this, especially since, if you look at the edit history, it is clear that I did not resort to vandalism, and that the harmful edit was left by User:203.214.110.143 (see diffs). Vsst 15:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

By the way, I've never even heard of popups, much less used it. Vsst 15:12, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, pl see the revert message at the history page, which states "Revert to revision 145114522 dated 2007-07-16 23:51:11 by Vsst using popups". It says to revert to your version. Not reverting your edits. Please, i don't resort to childish antics such as personal attacks! haha....—Sengkang 15:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh, I'm sorry. Please accept my apologies for accusing you of such. I guess I should listen to people when they tell me not to edit wikipedia when sleep deprived. :P Again, I'm really sorry about this mess, my fault. Vsst 15:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

It's ok. Just another day in Wikipedia! —Sengkang 15:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 20 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chao Tzee Cheng, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 19:29, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Did you know? was updated. On 21 July, 2007, a fact from the article Chen Wen Hsi, which you recently nominated, was featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Nice find :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 15:04, 21 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On July 25, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tang Choon Keng, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done again Sengkang and you have the picture slot. Good to see you back ant DYK and keeping sunny Singapore on the map. Happy editing. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 09:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! —Sengkang 09:27, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for helping revert vandalism, but please make sure that you subst: the warnings that you issue. Thanks! =) -- Gogo Dodo 07:25, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Like this??

  Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Oh, ok. I get your point. Thanks. —Sengkang 07:36, 25 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 27 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tan Howe Liang, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--W.marsh 16:41, 27 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 29 July, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article library@esplanade, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 01:30, 29 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

On August 1, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marina Coastal Expressway, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On August 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Former Singapore Badminton Hall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On August 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Former Asia Insurance Building, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done again Sengkang and another pictured slot. Happy editing, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:15, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I keep noticing your vandal reverts. Good work. Have you ever considered becoming an administrator? Tim Vickers 03:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks. I admire the work of wiki administrators, but that's out of my radar screen for now. —Sengkang 03:46, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, no problem. However, if you change your mind just drop me a note. All the best Tim Vickers 03:48, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure, same to you too. —Sengkang 03:49, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

By the way, have you tried Twinkle? It makes issuing warning templates extremely easy. Tim Vickers 03:50, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I have heard of it. But I am using Mozilla Firefox and I heard that TW does not support Firefox? —Sengkang 04:04, 2 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

No, it is the other way around. It only works in Firefox and doesn't work in IE. I use it in Firefox all the time. Tim Vickers 02:54, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Oh ok, thanks. I will give it a try. —Sengkang 02:58, 3 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		For being the excellent photographer of Singapore, you are hereby awarded another Barnstar. Well done, and keep up the good work. -- Altiris Exeunt 13:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! —Sengkang 14:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

		The Singapore Barnstar
		Awarded to User:Sengkang - veeeeeerrrrryyy great thanks for your all your extremely hard work on Singapore. The coverage on wikipedia is staggering!!!!! I've had the privelage of visiting the city four times and it is superb!!!Your prolific work is commendable -youve done Singapore proud. Nearly eveny decent article on Singapore I come across has been edited by you. Thankyou! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ "Expecting you?" Contribs 11:30, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I stubbed Scotts Road. If you could expand it great ! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 11:34, 5 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! —Sengkang 00:53, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I second both awards of course - you have been providing quality aritcles and photographs of Singapore for the main page.

On August 6, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Runme Shaw, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again, hope all is well with you and happy editing. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

  —Sengkang 08:47, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

One thing though. What happened to the Golden Landmark Hotel article? I have stayed there twice and I know ther eused to be an article on it. Is it possible you could write one on it without it seeming like an advert? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^{"Expecting you?" Contribs} 09:44, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Unfortunately, it was deleted due to Afd. You can look at the recent spate of deletion or suggested deletion of Singapore hotel articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Singapore. The deletionists have claimed that the hotel is of "limited encyclopaedic value". —Sengkang 09:55, 6 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

August 6,2007

Greetings Sengkang, I would like to obtain permission to use several of your wonderful pictures of Singapore for a book titled " Sustainable Tropical Cities" by Architects Bruno Stagno and Jimena Ugarte, published by the Institute for Tropical Architecture. We are a non profit organization established here in San Jose, Costa Rica. Please visit our website www.arquitecturatropical.org to get to know us better and our e-mail address is iatrop@racsa.co.cr We await for your response.

Thank-you and best regards, Melissa Ho Sanchez Assistant IAT

-196.40.38.102 August 7, 2007, 01:12

Sure, is there an English version for your website? —Sengkang 02:16, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

WarthogDemon has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

-WarthogDemon 02:25, 7 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greetings Sengkang,

Thank you very much for your permission and all credits will be respected. In regards to our website, our editorial(has articles in both English and Spanish, Acerca el Instituto and Programas sections are in English.

Warm regards, Melissa Assistant IAT

On 9 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with facts from the articles The Majestic, Singapore, and Eu Tong Sen, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Circeus 14:53, 9 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On August 10, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Liang Wern Fook, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again Sengkang!Blnguyen (bananabucket) 08:50, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

		The Barnstar of High Culture
		As you will have heard several times from others, your work on Singapore articles has been tremendous. It's important to have someone like yourself documenting the more vintage aspects of Singapore. Chensiyuan 09:30, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!   —Sengkang 09:35, 10 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

My apologies, I should have noticed you were the author, Jimfbleak 06:27, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure, no problem. —Sengkang 06:31, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I understand that you are a veteran SGpedian and a prolific writer of Singapore-related DYKs. However, how many GAs have you written? On WT:SG!, I suggested we quickly launch the GA drive and increase our GA count from 8 to 10 within a month. You may wish to adopt at least one of the following articles and collaborate with other SGpedians to improve it to GA status: Singapore, Singapore 2006 and The Singapore Stone. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 15:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've not written any GAs in fact. I'll see what I can do to help out. Thanks. —Sengkang 15:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 13 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pearl Bank Apartments , which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--DarkFalls ^talk 08:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On August 14, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article People's Park Complex, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks again, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:53, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 16 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Golden Mile Complex, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 12:08, 16 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thk u for yr assessment on the abv but I wld greatly appreciate if u cld include fair comment (See an example here) on your justification as a 'Start Class' which I'm keen to know why. By including comments on an article's assessment, it wld be meaningful to both the original creator or subsequent editors to understand the basis of its merits and deficiencies for improvement. Due to my involvement & interaction with some WikiProject groups like Schools, Military History & Macau in which such practice is commonly adopted, I hope to see senior SG editors like u adopt such best practices for the betterment of the SGpedia community too. Rgds -- Aldwinteo 05:00, 25 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. I've re-evaluated the article and upgraded it to "B" class. Kudos for the good articles that you have created. Your well-researched articles serve as a model for all SGpedians, including myself. —Sengkang 04:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thk u for yr re-evaluation. As a guide next time, do check out an article's 'What links here' to see whether it meets the suggested 'Good Article' rule-sets. As for this article, it was identified by 'User:AlexNewArtBot/GoodSearchResult', WikiProject Military History, WikiProject China & more. Tat's y I was curious on yr assessment criteria earlier. Upon receiving such positive feedback or being prodded   by a DYK reviewer, then will I proceed to self-nominate the article if no one do so earlier so as not to miss its nomination dateline. Rgds -- Aldwinteo 11:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

DYK contribution medal Obrigado, danke, and many other thanks for your hard work writing and submitting articles for the Did you know? section of the Main Page. While numbers are secondary to quality, 25 excellent contributions to the feature definitely deserves recognition, so I'm more than happy to present you with this richly-deserved medal. Keep or discard it as you fancy, but I hope you enjoy it (and it shouldn't be too long til you're eligible for entry into the 50+ club) :) — GeeJo (t)⁄(c) • 13:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!   —Sengkang 14:56, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 26 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Howe Yoon Chong, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Creeping ever closer to the 50 DYK mark :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 13:52, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Singapore baby!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:01, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Is there ever a bad article by you? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

URGENT! The article The Fullerton Singapore is under threat with a copywright warning. Please save it from any possible deletion thanks. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 17:12, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hmm...let's wait and see. Thanks. —Sengkang 01:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copywright is a serious issue. Surely you don't want to see this article deleted The Fullerton Singapore. It seriously needs addressing asap ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 11:54, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've put the The Fullerton Singapore up for speedy deletion as it is has been sitting there for weeks with copywright. As you keep generating new articles it is clear you don't regard copywright or this article important. I am a great fan of your work you know this but copywright is unacceptable. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 09:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The page has been blanked. ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 09:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Sure, I am working on it, will take some time. But I am disappointed that you have said that "it is clear you don't regard copywright or this article important". —Sengkang 14:56, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

But you can't wait weeks with copywright. Garion has deleted your article and stubbed it again because it wasn't unfortunately attended to and it had the copywright in the history. I'm a little surprised you didn't edit it particularly as you have been putting so much effort into creating new good articles ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 18:15, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I note your concern. This is a building with lots of history, and there's lots of materials that need to be gathered out there to improve it. While I am creating new articles, it doesn't mean that the article is not impt to me. As specified in the copyvio msg, users are not supposed to alter it. As such, I haved saved a copy of it in my user space, and am working on it there. After I have completed the whole re-vamp, will I transfer it to the temporary talk page at Talk:The Fullerton Singapore/Temp. Noted that it has already been re-created and stubbed. In the meantime, I have asked some of my SGpedians to help. I am just a drop in the ocean after all...haha....You could also chip in to help too... Thanks. —Sengkang 01:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ok sorry to be a bit uptight about it I guess it will be written soon enough. More great new articles by the way. Good work!! ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 15:57, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It has already been done: The Fullerton Singapore. Thanks. —Sengkang 15:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Ah you've done it brilliant - I moved the page to the title you wanted cool ? ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:01, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Great. Thanks! —Sengkang 16:02, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

A smily face   for a great editor . The article is much better even than before!!. keep the articles coming ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

You're welcome!   —Sengkang 16:09, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I restored the images to the page also. All the best ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 16:11, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for reverting inappropriate changes on the article Durian. --BorgQueen 20:46, 26 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

I am trying to understand the large revert (nearly 4k) to this article you did at 05:07, 27 August 2007. It looked to me that the previous editor's contributions were not vandalism, and it did not seem as if it were a matter of copyright violation, so I just wanted to know why it was taken out. (I am not the editor, btw.) Thanks. Milkfish 00:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Please note that the editor has simply copied a large chunk of the article and re-pasted it on the same article. Reversion comparison. Thanks. —Sengkang 00:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, I did not see that at first, because of the difference in formatting. One cannot really see it in the "diffs" but have to search through the older revision to understand what's going on. Milkfish 02:33, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 29 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Singapore Power Building, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 21:30, 29 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Nice article!! -- Samir 07:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!   —Sengkang 07:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Image:City Hall and Old Supreme Court Building, Jan 06.JPG What a great photo. I love the storm clouds it contrasts so well with the gray color of the building. Beautiful photo of a beautiful building. Thanks. IvoShandor 08:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

		The Photographer's Barnstar
		Image:City Hall and Old Supreme Court Building, Jan 06.JPG What a great photo. I love the storm clouds it contrasts so well with the gray color of the building. Beautiful photo of a beautiful building. IvoShandor 08:45, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!   —Sengkang 08:48, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 31 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sengkang Sports Complex, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks for your continued contributions to DYK! Daniel 12:34, 31 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 2 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tan Teck Guan Building, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Daniel 01:26, 2 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 4 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article National Art Gallery of Singapore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 14:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 7 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Punggol New Town, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 08:12, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

		The 50 DYK Medal
		Awarded to Sengkang for 50 52 outstanding contributions to Did You Know?. Thanks for your excellent help in building the encyclopedia. IvoShandor 09:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Congratulations on your 50 contributions! I know this is a bit late but they didn't have a 52 contributions medal. : ) IvoShandor 09:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thank you!   —Sengkang 09:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 7 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article DHL Balloon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 16:16, 7 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 8 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Fullerton Hotel Singapore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

---- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 02:54, 8 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

In view of your involvement with Antarctica, your input at WikiProject Deletion sorting/Antarctica MfD would be appreciated. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 22:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Greetings from the other end of the Causeway. I'm just amazed at your ability to grab hold of so many shots from all over Singapore. I've been doing the same since the end of 2006, so I couldn't help thinking we have a common goal. Any tips on photography for Commons? - Two hundred percent 11:25, 12 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi Two hundred percent, I am just an amateur photographer who likes to lug a camera along whenever I commute. So, those are photos that I have accumulated over 2++ years. Nothing quite amazing though. Do you keep an album of your shots either in here or at Commons? —Sengkang 16:58, 13 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Not yet, but I will when have the time to sort them out. Guess we're at the same footing as far as photography is concerned. Cheers. - Two hundred percent 20:49, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

It was a tiny matter of the formatting in that section somehow creating a picture-overlap. The stop-gap measure worked perfectly in the preview, but didn't in the actual article. Seeing as you care so much, maybe you should fix it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.27.126.77 (talk) 09:16, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Tsunami article received heavy editing today by new/unregistered users, which I noticed at WikiRage.com. The article may benefit from a good review. According to Wikipedia Page History Statistics, you are one of the top contributors to that page. If you have the time, would you please read over the article and make any necessary changes. Thanks. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 19:55, 14 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 18 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Swan and Maclaren, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 12:27, 18 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I've proposed that the category Category:Singaporean phenomenons that you created be renamed Category:Singaporean phenomena, as the plural of "phenomenon" is "phenomena" and not "phenomenons". If you have comments you'd like to add to the discussion of the renaming, please make them at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 September 19#Category:Singaporean phenomenons. Cheers, Jacklee 12:41, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have made my comments. Thanks. —Sengkang 14:33, 19 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Tanjong Katong Primary School, logo.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 09:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, Ok. —Sengkang 09:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 21 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stamford House, Singapore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

On 21 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Monkey tree phenomenon, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 13:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Monkey tree is genius!!! Its like it is controlled by a Monkey god or something!! Fascinating ♦ Sir Blofeld ♦ ^"Talk"? 19:13, 21 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Haha, I've yet to visit the tree. Just like what the press says: "Believing is seeing". —Sengkang 02:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I've just been there. Unfortunately my camera just died as I wanted to take shots. T_T - Mailer Diablo 08:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Wow, looks like something's really happening there. haha. —Sengkang 08:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, sorry for the lateness of this message, but the following was erroneously placed on my talk page several weeks ago.

On August 20, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Concourse, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Well done sir you have earned yourself the pictured slot. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 01:27, 20 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

---User:Lostvelt (me)

Oh, thank you. —Sengkang 15:46, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 24 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Yue Hwa Building, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 14:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

• Another one in the bag! :D - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 16:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.   —Sengkang 17:08, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Re: User talk:64.18.37.118: Please avoid giving warnings in the same month at a lower level than previous ones - it makes the whole system pointless. The bot can be forgiven, and you probably didn't notice the two headings were identical or the first warning was for blatant vandalism, but at most one final warning should have been given in this case. Richard001 01:27, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

That was NOT vandalisim. A meteorite hit a province in Peru and it ruptured a naturally occurring deposit of Arsenic and that made the villagers ill. Can you RESTORE this ? 65.163.112.187 06:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

I saw that in the "History" section in the aforementioned article. 65.163.112.187 06:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 27 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tanjong Katong Primary School, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 10:59, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 27 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article South Beach, Singapore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 21:24, 27 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 29 September, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marine Parade Community Building, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Carabinieri 14:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 2 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article International Plaza, Singapore, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cheers, D_arkF_alls ^talk 08:10, 2 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

On 5 October, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Gallery Hotel, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 23:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

You stubbornly remove and report as vandalism my edit about corporal punishment taking place at SG schools. Truth is not vandalism and your attempts at concealing it is pathetic. Wish you could sue me for libel at a Singapore court, don't you ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.63.33.198 (talk) 18:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have a question. Why did you delete my contribution to Earth? Why was it vandalism? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Colleenthegreat (talk • contribs) 01:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Can you please explain why you keep removing my edits? Colleenthegreat 01:54, 19 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Thanks for that edit. I hadn't thought that the test would give results so quickly. I thought it'd take at least a few days. I'm not a regular contributor to wikipedia, in fact, that test text was my first edit on this wiki. I feel much more comfortable with wikipedia's reliability after seeing how regularly the changes are moderated. Sumitdhole 13:57, October 21, 2007

This template is being deleted and replaced with Template:Infobox Skyscraper. Several of the articles in your workspace used the old template. I did a quick replace with the new template, and "hid" any information that's not being used, so that if you wish to include it in the article you may do so. SkierRMH 07:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mercy Fall, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercy Fall. Thank you. — iridescent 16:39, 31 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello! I hope you are feeling fine. I would just like to know whether you are interested in becoming an admin. I have noticed that you are a tireless contributor to this project. If adminship is given to you, I believe that this project will benefit from it. Please reply your answer in my talk page. Thanks! --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 03:31, 9 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

There is a DRV discussion here related to the Japanese citrus category that may benefit from your input in view of your contributions to the Fruit article. Thanks. -- Jreferee t/c 20:29, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:1992 animal deaths, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:1992 animal deaths has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:1992 animal deaths, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:20, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

You're invited to sign up as a founding member, at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#WikiProject Historic Sites ! :) doncram (talk) 07:14, 15 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Monkey tree, Jurong West, The New Paper, Sep 07.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 21:17, 3 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Liang Wern Fook, NTU.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:South Beach, Singapore, URA, Sep 07.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Tuesday evening (4 September). Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 6. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 00:52, 30 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup on Wednesday the 31st of October. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Singapore 7. Hope you can make it. JVbot (talk) 04:13, 16 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Singapore)

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Church of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mkdw^talk 06:18, 11 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, Temple Street, Singapore, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: "Temple Street, Singapore" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 02:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pulau semakau landfill.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:26, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Tanjong Katong Primary School, logo.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:33, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for uploading File:Tanjong Katong Primary School, logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 13:42, 4 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Gallery Hotel/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 02:26, 20 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi sengkang, I'm involved in a community project (JalanJalan) which seeks to document Singapore history through places. Would it be ok if we use your photographs? We will credit you accordingly. Do let us know if you require more information or how we may contact you. Thank you!Jalanjalansg (talk) 04:08, 10 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/The Fullerton Singapore/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 10:37, 22 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/International Plaza/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Monkey tree phenomenon/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Swan & Maclaren/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Marine Parade Community Building/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Tanjong Katong Primary School/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Stamford House, Singapore/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Yue Hwa Building/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:56, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/DHL Balloon/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/Loyang Tua Pek Kong Temple/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/National Art Gallery, Singapore/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on User:Sengkang/Sketchpad/South Beach, Singapore/Raw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 18:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello Sengkang!

I have used a pair of photos of Balaeniceps rex in my free software educational proyect "Animalandia" (http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org)

You can see directly in the follow link and clic over "Siguiente" ("Next") several times:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/imagen.php?id=45732

If you wish (and I hope yes), you can send me (via fernando.lison@educa.madrid.org) some letters or/and a photo for your "contributor profile" in Animalandia:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Sengkang

I want show to my students (and so everybody) that Animalandia is make for "real person", and I can tell them about "generosity", "share" and other similar words that we use very few at this time...

This is my "contributor profile" and others, for example:

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Fernando%20Lis%F3n%20Mart%EDn

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Carmen%20Jim%E9nez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=David%20P%E9rez

http://animalandia.educa.madrid.org/autor.php?nombre=Steve%20Garvie%20%28Rainbirder%29

In the future, I use more of your photos, I sure!

Thank you for the licence and, of course, for your splendid photos!!

Regards!

Fernando Lisón, from Spain --Fernando.lison (talk) 06:30, 2 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Tanglin Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks any sources or references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The article Marine Parade Road has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks any sources or references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 06:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Sengkang. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 23:38, 4 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on Banda Street requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:41, 28 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monkey tree phenomenon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey tree phenomenon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Darylgolden^(talk) Ping when replying 09:41, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply