Josh Grosse

  Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:44, 9 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article English words with uncommon properties is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English words with uncommon properties until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:31, 30 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:Gelbflossen-thunfisch.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —innotata 18:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

A tag has been placed on File:Cromileptes altivelis - Paddelbarsch - Panther grouper.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —innotata 23:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

(delivered by mabdul 23:31, 3 December 2012 (UTC))Reply

Thanks for creating Pawn (chess), Josh Grosse!

Wikipedia editor GeorgeLouis just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

This article was marked as reviewed, but it still showed up on the list of articles to be checked.

To reply, leave a comment on GeorgeLouis's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Pokémon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Pokémon until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. S/s/a/z-1/2 (talk) 06:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, Josh Grosse. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Ryan (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:35, 27 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

   == Acidobacterium listed at Redirects for discussion ==

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Acidobacterium. Since you had some involvement with the Acidobacterium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Teixiptla (talk) 00:57, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I am a English Wikipedian as well as I edit Gujarati Wikipedia (my native language Wikipedia). I have came here by knowing about your interest in maths. I need one help. I just created the page for Photon (particle) on Gujarati Wikipdia. There are one error in the equation: The symbol of ν (nu) are not showing in two place of equations. I don't know how to fix it as I am not expert in math programming of Wiki. I am putting that 'equation-portion' on may sandbox in English. Can you fix this problem, so I can use it on Gujarati Wikipedia. Link of 'equation-portion my sandbox : User:Gazal world/sandbox   Thank youGazal world (talk) 21:34, 1 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Clade has been nominated for merging with Template:Cladogram. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Chicbyaccident (talk) 22:59, 16 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2984/New speak. Since you had some involvement with the 2984/New speak redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:47, 15 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

The page Haemosporida has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done for the following reason:

histmergin' brb

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:37, 25 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Siamese -Betta- fighter fish and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 July 7#Siamese -Betta- fighter fish until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TraderCharlotte (talk) 20:39, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Amino acid has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 22:15, 8 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

  A discussion is taking place to address a potential problem with the redirect Chromatiales and it has been listed for discussion. Anyone, including you, is welcome to participate at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 12 § Chromatiales until a consensus is reached. Artoria2e5 🌉 11:53, 12 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Electricity has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Onegreatjoke (talk) 00:15, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

E (mathematical constant) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 19:13, 30 December 2023 (UTC)Reply