Entertainment Buff

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

 

Greetings!

The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!

Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

• Overall winner
  • 1st - $500
  • 2nd - $200
  • 3rd - $100
• Diversity winner - $100
• Gender-gap fillers - $100
• Language Winners - up to $100*

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)

Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list

This article's only two sources are sources that, when I examined them in Google Books, mentioned nothing about any sort of dancing clown. Creator and primary editor of this article attempted to create numerous hoax articles in the past and add false information to articles. I could find absolutely nothing about this movie when I did an Internet search. Based on all this, I am led to believe that this article is a hoax and that this film is nonexistent. Link to article: The Dancing Clown

ApplePieGuy95 (talk) 17:56, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think you have the wrong contributor. I don't recall making any entries about this movie. Sorry. Entertainment Buff (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry for the confusion if you thought that I was implicating you in this. The contributor's name is "Cornbread pancakes." Very revealing. ApplePieGuy95 (talk) 21:43, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello @Entertainment Buff. I am interested in improving the article on the actor Ross Elliott. I notice you tried the other day to link to the article on him at Find a Grave, which another editor disapproved. But that entry did have a lot of information that might usefully be added to the Wikipedia article, if reliable sources could be located. I have not had much luck at that. Could you take a look at the entry I just put on talk: Ross Elliott and let me know if you can help? PDGPA (talk) 01:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

 

Thanks for uploading File:Ona Munson says Belle Watling difficult to portray in GWTW, Dec 14, 1939.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Please review WP:NOTAMB and stop adding hatnotes to articles that don't have an ambiguous name. Thank you. snapsnap ^(talk) 20:24, 17 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Will do. Thank you very much for your advice!!! Entertainment Buff (talk) 18:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at John Goodman, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Chauncey Green (talk) 09:42, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

There must be some mistake here. I did not vandalize John Goodman. I am a long-time editor with over 33,000 edits. I was simply writing that John Goodman played a director William Castle-like filmmaker in "Matinee". Please explain to me how this is considered vandalism. I am totally baffled.

Thank you. Entertainment Buff (talk) 09:48, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

You can ignore that warning...just one of our long-term abusers found a new account. DMacks (talk) 10:14, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you. Entertainment Buff (talk) 10:15, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

That person must be from the UK. Notice how he or she spells "vandalised". Perhaps find the IP address and block that from making any more edits to Wikipedia? Since this is a repeat, long-term abuser? Entertainment Buff (talk) 10:25, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

IP tracing is definitely a good idea! There are only a handful of WP admins who have access to that info due to privacy rules, and likewise they cannot reveal to anyone outside that group all the details of their findings or some of the actions they take basead on them. But they're on the case, and both they and some of the features of the WP software do have an impact. But given this abuser appears to have been active for over a decade, they also know how to evade some of those measures. I don't have access to the IP data and also am intentionally being vague about some of the actions WP takes to avoid making it too easy to evade them. Feel free to email me if you'd like a bit more detail. DMacks (talk) 17:13, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. If that abuser has been active for more than a decade, this most definitely needs to be addressed. Escalate it, please. That user definitely needs to get some psychological help.

Thanks for restoring my edit on John Goodman. Entertainment Buff (talk) 17:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Chakiris, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gentlemen Prefer Blondes (film). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. Correction made. Entertainment Buff (talk) 13:03, 2 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) Reply