Duke Gilmore

 

Hi Duke Gilmore! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:42, Saturday, December 22, 2018 (UTC)

 

Hi Duke Gilmore! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:43, Saturday, December 22, 2018 (UTC)

 

Hi Duke Gilmore! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 20:44, Saturday, December 22, 2018 (UTC)

Hello - my name is Susan Gerbic (Sgerbic) and I'm writing to you because at some point you joined Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism. This might have been months ago - or even years ago. With the best of intentions the project was created years ago, and sadly like many WikiProjects has started to go dormant. A group of us are attempting to revitalize the Skepticism project, already we have begun to clean up the main page and I've just redone the participant page. No one is in charge of this project, it is member directed, which might have been the reason it almost went dormant. We are attempting to bring back conversations on the talk page and have two subprojects as well, in the hopes that it might spark involvement and a way of getting to know each other better. One was created several years ago but is very well organized and a lot of progress was made, Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skeptical organisations in Europe. The other I created a couple weeks ago, it is very simple and has a silly name Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Skepticism Stub Sub-Project Project (SSSPP). This sub-project runs from March 1 to June 1, 2022. We are attempting to rewrite skepticism stubs and add them to this list. As you can see we have already made progress.

The reason I'm writing to you now is because we would love to have you come back to the project and become involved, either by working on one of the sub-projects, proposing your own (and managing it), or just hanging out on the talk page getting to know the other editors and maybe donate some of your wisdom to some of the conversations. As I said, no one is in charge, so if you have something in mind you would like to see done, please suggest it on the talk page and hopefully others will agree. Please add the project to your watchlist, update your personal user page showing you are a proud member of WikiProject Skepticism. And DIVE in, this is what the work list looks like [1] frightening at first glance, but we have already started chipping away at it.

The Wikipedia:WikiProject Skepticism/Participants page has gone though a giant change - you may want to update your information. And of course if this project no longer interests you, please remove your name from the participant list, we would hate to see you go, but completely understand.

Thank you for your time, I hope to edit with you in the future.Sgerbic (talk) 07:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks again for reviewing the edit request for Move (company). If you're willing to review a very similar request for Realtor.com, I'd be much appreciated. Thanks either way! Inkian Jason (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I was coming here to thank you again for performing my COI edit-request. However, now I have to let you know that someone reverted it (under the false note that they reverted a different edit). I agreed with you for not performing the edits for which you didn't feel they were WP:RS, and I thought your edits were good. I'd be interested in your thoughts on the revert. Again, I appreciate your help. Ron Schnell 17:24, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited NuScale Power, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rail. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Grove Collaborative, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amazon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	For your consistent and impactful contributions to the COI edit request backlog. Thank you for assisting those editors! ZsinjTalk 00:30, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks...the backlog was over 250 when I started on the queue a month ago. I try and do a few every day. Duke Gilmore (talk) 13:17, 14 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Duke Gilmore, I have an unanswered request that I have posted on the Talk page of the Verizon Communications article about the subsection Merger of equals (2000–2002). Since you have shown interest in the Verizon Communications article in the past, I thought it may be of interest to you.

As I work for Verizon and have a conflict of interest, I ask others to look at my requests and make edits on my behalf. I can answer any questions about these requests on the Verizon Communications Talk page. Thank you, VZEric (talk) 19:57, 30 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Duke Gilmore: Hi, I just wanted to let you know that I responded to your comment concerning the (first) Item #5 in the proposal I posted over on the Jim Johnsen Talk page. I don't want to split the discussion by pinging you on your own User Talk page, but because I realize that proposal is rather long and complicated and I don't want the new reply I posted to get lost in the shuffle, I thought it would be a good idea to leave you a notice here in case you miss it over there. Thank you for your interest in my suggestions and I look forward to your feedback in due course. 92ranger (talk) 02:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Duke Gilmore, thank you for taking a look at the request I submitted on George Pyne and partially answering it. I responded to your message on the Talk page, have you had a chance to read my reply? I tried to tag you but it's possible the notification didn't work Stoppat (talk) 12:40, 16 February 2023 (UTC)Reply