Talk:The Spectacular Spider-Man

I'm reverting a few of he changes made by User:81.132.94.50

First Im returning the qualifier at the top of the article to This article concerns the various series which have been titled The Spectacular Spider-Man, including Peter Parker, The Spectacular Spider-Man (1976). For the later, 1990s Peter Parker series see Peter Parker: Spider-Man.

I know its long but I think its more appropriate then the For the later 90's series by Todd McFarlane see Peter Parker: Spider-Man. bit that he added.

Its extremely unlikely that someone is gonna enter in Peter Parker, The Spectacular Spider-Man (which is a redirect here and why the qualifier is there) looking to find McFarlane's series as it was titled just Spider-Man under him. The reason I put it there is because the 1990s title was later called Peter Parker: Spider-Man and I thought that someone might get confused over their Peter Parker titles and enter the longer title by mistake.

Also Im returning the wikilink to Samm Barnes. I dont know why she was delinked - though its red now shes notable enough that someone will create an article eventually. I could understand someone changing it to Sarah Barnes (shes been credited as both) but keep it wikified! Hueysheridan 21:54, 28 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I've edited and cut down a long, highly opinionated essay on Spectacular Spider-Man V.1. It was filled with POV, uncited claims, original research, and such pure opinions as "Bill Sienkiewicz's inks over Sal Buscema’s pencilling was a somewhat unpalatable combination." Aside form the fact many people thought it was some of S. Buscema's best work, it's complete opinion, and the editor who wrote this essay should please read Wikipedia's policies and guidelines at WP:POV. WP:OR, etc. -- Tenebrae 13:23, 20 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

An intro ought to be included, IMO, that talks about how this title was differentiated with the main Amazing Spider-Man title, if at all. RobertM525 09:12, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Added one, to explain basically why there's more than one Spidey title. -HKMarks 17:33, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I have proposed merging Countdown (Spectacular Spider-Man) into this article. I know that it has been tagged for having several problems, but I figure that merging the article to here would be preferable to deleting it outright. --GentlemanGhost 18:30, 26 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 17:46, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 14:38, 24 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Spectacular Spider-Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/19960101-re_/http://www.worldfamouscomics.com/tony/back20050510.shtml to http://www.maelmill-insi.de/UHBMCC/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:54, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Spectacular Spider-Man. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130515112144/http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=1306 to http://www.the-trades.com/article.php?id=1306

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply