Talk:List of generation IV Pokémon
 | Lucario was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 8 September 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of generation IV Pokémon. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| Drifloon was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 28 July 2021 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into List of generation IV Pokémon. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of generation IV Pokémon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "List of generation IV Pokémon" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months  |
 | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
"Pokédex (Sinnoh)" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Pokédex (Sinnoh) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 10 § Pokédex (Sinnoh) until a consensus is reached. Jay 💬 13:02, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
"Magburn" listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
The redirect Magburn has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 29 § Magburn until a consensus is reached. cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 16:42, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Give Infernape his own page!
editHe’s one of the most famous Pokémon of all time and one of almost everyone’s personal favorites. Please make an article for him! --PyukumukuAce (talk) 14:16, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Why does Arceus not have his own page???
editHe’s the mascot of Legends Arceus and well-known as the god of Pokémon! Give him his own page! --PyukumukuAce (talk) 14:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- if you can provide enough reliable sources for its notability, that can happen. same goes for infernape
- also arkoos isn't male and starters like chimchar are only mostly male, but that's besides the point cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 14:28, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
TWO WORDS. BULBA. PEDIA. --PyukumukuAce (talk) 14:44, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- this isn't bulbapedia. wikipedia requires significant coverage of something to warrant an article for it. otherwise, it would be riddled with fancruft on things no one cares about, like that one phone cover ex machina from little witch academia. also, bulbapedia is one word cogsan (nag me) (stalk me) 15:09, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
- @PyukumukuAce: Frankly, Arceus struggles on two points: firstly, a lot of Pokémon do not receive significant coverage, even if they are significant in-universe. Secondly, Arceus is also very hard to search, having to sift through every single mention of its game. Ironically, being a mascot is a detriment for it getting an article.