Talk:Hawker Hart
Latest comment: 2 years ago by 148.252.132.148 in topic Hawker demons range
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hawker Hart article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
WP:MILHIST Assessment
editIncludes the majority of what needs to be said on this subject; includes pictures, specs and an infobox, and has more prose than many mil. aviation pages. Nice work. LordAmeth 08:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
- Could use more citations to be even better. --Colputt 01:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Too many photos crammed in and too many on both margins, a deprecated practice. Keith-264 (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
use of Osprey
editin the description it says: "The Hawker Osprey was the navalised carrier-borne version " - the term "carrier-borne" strikes me as wrong! As far as I can see it was not used on carriers but large surface units EXCEPT carriers like the cruiser Enterprise (see picture). But this is a float-plane! 80.151.9.187 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
- It was operated off carriers with a conventional landing gear, but could also be fitted with floats - like many aircraft operated by the Fleet Air Arm at the time - see File:Service of Squadron Leader Arthur Berkeley in the Royal Air Force, 1925-1934 HU63336.jpg for an example of an Osprey without floats.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)
Hawker demons range
editI need to knoww 148.252.132.148 (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)