Talk:Dangerous Woman (song)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Dangerous Woman (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.allaccess.com/top40-mainstream/future-releases

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

According to Grande, there will be two versions of the musics video, differentiated by the titles of "Visual 1" and "Visual 2". Should we include both versions or treat them as one? I would like to refer to the Sparks (Hilary Duff song) music video for reference. -- User:192.5.215.225 (10:57AM EST 3/31/16) —Preceding undated comment added 14:59, 31 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Someone fix it please. Thanks. SalemHanna (talk) 15:41, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

You are someone. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:43, 16 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Summarizing the reviews is synthesis. Are all the reviews everywhere positive? Prove it. How many of the reviews randomly selected to be here are "acclaim" rather than merely "positive" or "neutral"? How did you decide this? Are the sources here representative of all the professional reviewers on the planet?

The sources say what they say. As soon as we decide this review is positive, this other one is a rave and a third one is acclaim, and lump them together, we are combining material from two or more sources to say something none of the sources say directly. This is synthesis. - SummerPhD^v2.0 00:51, 28 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

If material is synthesis and someone removes it as such, restoring it a week later is no better than restoring it immediately. The material is disputed. Per WP:BRD, it is time to discuss it.

If you discuss the material, you might convince others it should stay or you might work together to come up with a workable compromise.

If you do not discuss the material and repeatedly restore it, you are edit warring. The material will be repeatedly removed and you will be blocked from editing.

Take your pick. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:34, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

@SummerPhDv2.0:, you're wasting your time. The IPs that keep adding that SYN include:

• 166.170.34.148 (talk · contribs)
• 166.170.33.165 (talk · contribs)
• 73.81.144.205 (talk · contribs)
• 87.21.226.108 (talk · contribs)
• 175.156.224.187 (talk · contribs)
• 175.156.53.191 (talk · contribs)
• 87.21.209.34 (talk · contribs)
• 138.75.179.235 (talk · contribs)
• 86.110.155.87 (talk · contribs)
• 104.231.81.183 (talk · contribs)
• 2604:2000:1303:d4:a09b:229:f710:b2f4 (talk · contribs)
• 86.110.155.87 (talk · contribs)
• ...

These all appear to be the IP versions of Smoore95GAGA (talk · contribs) and its now-blocked sock MoonlightMusician (talk · contribs) as evidenced here. I've requested semi-pp. Toddst1 (talk) 19:07, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

And has been done. Thanks @Widr:. Toddst1 (talk) 19:29, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Two editors are intent on keeping excessive material in this article. This is the latest one. What the singer has to say about the lyrics which are written by someone else is probably real important to the fans, but have very little encyclopedic value, especially given that a. the article is already full of fairly insignificant detail and b. at least the comments on the lyrics are terribly sourced--what is Enstarz.com but a gossip/chat site full of commercialized fan trivia? And that quote on the title change, that's just way too long and needs to be cut if it is to be kept.

In addition, the edit summary by Music01, "Selena Gomez also didn't write Same Old Love, and her explanation wasn't removed just because she didn't write", betrays their inexperience: that another mediocre article (also C-class, and ever more bloated than this one) has something doesn't mean this one should have it. Articles on hit songs seem to be the new area where everything that's more or less verified gets stuck in as if we're Wikia. Drmies (talk) 17:40, 3 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Dangerous woman US pure sale is 890,000 keeps on changing back to 842,000+ for some reason Iamgoffe (talk) 17:37, 14 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved

Should the article include as many lyrics as are currently displayed in the "Composition and lyrics" section? ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@U990467 and Cartoon network freak: Pinging the two Good article review participants, just in case. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 17:29, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Another Believer: Fixed the whole section now. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! ---Another Believer _(Talk) 18:26, 15 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dangerous Woman (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151226122413/http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS&artist=Taylor%20Swift&format=&go=Search&perPage=50 to http://riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php?table=SEARCH_RESULTS&artist=Taylor%20Swift&format=&go=Search&perPage=50
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://recordreport.com.ve/publico/anglo/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:58, 4 September 2017 (UTC)Reply