[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Monarchism

(Redirected from Monarchists)

Monarchism is the advocacy of the system of monarchy or monarchical rule.[1] A monarchist is an individual who supports this form of government independently of any specific monarch, whereas one who supports a particular monarch is a royalist. Conversely, the opposition to monarchical rule is referred to as republicanism.[2][3][4]

  Commonwealth realms (parliamentary monarchies in personal union)

Depending on the country, a royalist may advocate for the rule of the person who sits on the throne, a regent, a pretender, or someone who would otherwise occupy the throne but has been deposed.

History

edit

Monarchical rule is among the oldest political institutions.[5] The similar form of societal hierarchy known as chiefdom or tribal kingship is prehistoric. Chiefdoms provided the concept of state formation, which started with civilizations such as Mesopotamia, Ancient Egypt and the Indus Valley civilization.[6] In some parts of the world, chiefdoms became monarchies.[7]

Monarchs have generally ceded power in the modern era, having substantially diminished since World War I and World War II. This process can be traced back to the 18th century, when Voltaire and others encouraged "enlightened absolutism", which was embraced by the Holy Roman Emperor Joseph II and by Catherine II of Russia.[citation needed]

In the 17th and 18th centuries the Enlightenment began.[8] This resulted in new anti-monarchist ideas[9] which resulted in several revolutions such as the 18th century American Revolution and the French Revolution which were both additional steps in the weakening of power of European monarchies. Each in its different way exemplified the concept of popular sovereignty upheld by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. 1848 ushered in a wave of revolutions against the continental European monarchies. World War I and its aftermath saw the end of three major European monarchies: the Russian Romanov dynasty, the German Hohenzollern dynasty, including all other German monarchies, and the Austro-Hungarian Habsburg dynasty.[citation needed]

With the arrival of communism in Eastern Europe by the end of 1947, the remaining Eastern European monarchies, namely the Kingdom of Romania, the Kingdom of Hungary, the Kingdom of Albania, the Kingdom of Bulgaria, and the Kingdom of Yugoslavia, were all abolished and replaced by socialist republics.

Africa

edit

Central Africa

edit

In 1966, the Central African Republic was overthrown at the hands of Jean-Bédel Bokassa during the Saint-Sylvestre coup d'état. He established the Central African Empire in 1976 and ruled as Emperor Bokassa I until 1979, when he was subsequently deposed during Operation Caban and Central Africa returned to republican rule.[citation needed]

Ethiopia

edit

In 1974, one of the world's oldest monarchies was abolished in Ethiopia with the fall of Emperor Haile Selassie.[citation needed]

Asia

edit

China

edit

For most of its history, China was organized into various dynastic states under the rule of hereditary monarchs. Beginning with the establishment of dynastic rule by Yu the Great c. 2070 BC, and ending with the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912, Chinese historiography came to organize itself around the succession of monarchical dynasties.[a][b] Besides those established by the dominant Han ethnic group or its spiritual Huaxia predecessors, dynasties throughout Chinese history were also founded by non-Han peoples.[15]

India

edit

In India, monarchies recorded history of thousands of years before the country was declared a republic in 1950. King George VI had previously been the last Emperor of India until August 1947, when the British Raj dissolved. Karan Singh served as the last prince regent of Jammu and Kashmir until November 1952.[citation needed]

Japan

edit
 
Enthronement ceremony of Emperor Naruhito in 2019

The emperor of Japan or Tennō (天皇, pronounced [tennoꜜː]), literally "ruler from heaven" or "heavenly sovereign",[16][c] is the hereditary monarch and head of state of Japan. The Imperial Household Law governs the line of imperial succession. The emperor is personally immune from prosecution[18] and is also recognized as the head of the Shinto religion, which holds the emperor to be the direct descendant of the sun goddess Amaterasu. According to tradition, the office of emperor was created in the 7th century BC, but modern scholars believe that the first emperors did not appear until the 5th or 6th centuries AD.[19][20] During the Kamakura period from 1185 to 1333, the shōguns were the de facto rulers of Japan, with the emperor and the imperial court acting as figureheads.[21] In 1867, shogun Tokugawa Yoshinobu stepped down, restoring Emperor Meiji to power.[22] The Meiji Constitution was adopted In 1889, after which the emperor became an active ruler with considerable political power that was shared with the Imperial Diet.[23] After World War II, the 1947 Constitution of Japan was enacted, defining the emperor as the symbol of the Japanese state and the unity of the Japanese people.[24] The emperor has exercised a purely ceremonial role ever since.[25]

Europe

edit

Albania

edit

The last separate monarchy to take root in Europe, Albania began its recognised modern existence as a principality (1914) and became a kingdom after a republican interlude in 1925–1928. Since 1945 the country has operated as an independent republic. The Albanian Democratic Monarchist Movement Party (founded in 2004) and the Legality Movement Party (founded in 1924) advocate restoration of the House of Zogu as monarchs—the concept has gained little electoral support.[citation needed]

Austria-Hungary

edit

Following the collapse of Austria-Hungary, the Republic of German-Austria was proclaimed. The Constitutional Assembly of German Austria passed the Habsburg Law, which permanently exiled the Habsburg family from Austria. Despite this, significant support for the Habsburg family persisted in Austria. Following the Anschluss of 1938, the Nazi government suppressed monarchist activities. By the time Nazi rule ended in Austria, support for monarchism had largely evaporated.[26]

In Hungary, the rise of the Hungarian Soviet Republic in 1919 provoked an increase in support for monarchism; however, efforts by Hungarian monarchists failed to bring back a royal head of state, and the monarchists settled for a regent, Admiral Miklós Horthy, to represent the monarchy until the throne could be re-occupied. Horthy ruled as regent from 1920 to 1944. During his regency, attempts were made by Karl von Habsburg (r. 1916–1918) to return to the Hungarian throne, which ultimately failed. Following Karl's death in 1922, his claim to the Kingdom of Hungary was inherited by Otto von Habsburg (1912–2011), although no further attempts were made to take the Hungarian throne.[citation needed]

France

edit
 
Louis Philippe I being sworn in as King

France was ruled by monarchs from the establishment of the Kingdom of West Francia in 843 until the end of the Second French Empire in 1870, with several interruptions.

Classical French historiography usually regards Clovis I, king of the Franks (r. 507–511), as the first king of France. However, historians today consider that such a kingdom did not begin until the establishment of West Francia, during the dissolution of the Carolingian Empire in the 800s.[27][28]

Germany

edit

In 1920s Germany, a number of monarchists gathered around the German National People's Party (founded in 1918), which demanded the return of the Hohenzollern monarchy and an end to the Weimar Republic; the party retained a large base of support until the rise of Nazism in the 1930s, as Adolf Hitler staunchly opposed monarchism.[29]

Italy

edit

The aftermath of World War II saw the return of monarchist/republican rivalry in Italy, where a referendum was held on whether the state should remain a monarchy or become a republic. The republican side won the vote by a narrow margin, and the modern Republic of Italy was created.[30]

Liechtenstein

edit

There have been 16 monarchs of the Principality of Liechtenstein since 1608. The current Prince of Liechtenstein, Hans-Adam II, has reigned since 1989. In 2003, during a referendum, 64.3% of the population voted to increase the power of the prince.[citation needed]

Norway

edit

The position of King of Norway has existed continuously since the unification of Norway in 872. Following the dissolution of union with Sweden and the abdication of King Oscar II of Sweden as King of Norway, the 1905 Norwegian monarchy referendum saw 78.94% of Norway's voters approving the government's proposition to invite Prince Carl of Denmark to become their new king. Following the vote, the prince then accepted the offer, becoming King Haakon VII.[citation needed]

In 2022, the Norwegian parliament held a vote on abolishing the monarchy and replacing it with a republic. The proposal failed, with a 134–35 result in favor of retaining the monarchy. The idea was highly controversial in Norway, as the vote was spearheaded by the sitting Minister of Culture and Equality, who had sworn an oath of loyalty to King Harald V of Norway the previous year. Additionally, when polls were conducted, it was found that 84% of the Norwegian public supported the monarchy, with only 16% unsure or against the monarchy.[citation needed]

Russia

edit

Monarchy in the Russian Empire collapsed in March 1917, following the abdication of Tsar Nicholas II. Parts of the White movement, and in particular émigrés and their Supreme Monarchical Council [ru] (founded in 1921 and now based in Canada) continued to advocate for monarchy as "the sole path to the rebirth of Russia". In the modern era, a minority of Russians, including Vladimir Zhirinovsky (1946–2022), have openly advocated for a restoration of the Russian monarchy. Grand Duchess Maria Vladimirovna is widely considered the valid heir to the throne, in the event that a restoration occurs. Other pretenders and their supporters dispute her claim.

Spain

edit

In 1868, Queen Isabella II of Spain was deposed during the Spanish Glorious Revolution. The Duke of Aosta, an Italian prince, was invited to rule and replace Isabella. He did so for a three-year period, reigning as Amadeo I before abdicating in 1873, resulting in the establishment of the First Spanish Republic. The republic lasted less than two years, and was overthrown during a coup by General Arsenio Martínez Campos. Campos restored the Bourbon monarchy under Isabella II's more popular son, Alfonso XII.

After the 1931 Spanish local elections, King Alfonso XIII voluntarily left Spain and republicans proclaimed a Second Spanish Republic.[31] After the assassination of opposition leader José Calvo Sotelo in 1936, right-wing forces banded together to overthrow the Republic. During the Spanish Civil War of 1936 to 1939, General Francisco Franco established the basis for the Spanish State (1939–1975). In 1938, the autocratic government of Franco claimed to have reconstituted the Spanish monarchy in absentia (and in this case ultimately yielded to a restoration, in the person of King Juan Carlos).

In 1975, Juan Carlos I became King of Spain and began the Spanish transition to democracy. He abdicated in 2014, and was succeeded by his son Felipe VI.

United Kingdom

edit
 
Crowd attending the 2022 Platinum Jubilee of Elizabeth II

In England, royalty ceded power to other groups in a gradual process. In 1215, a group of nobles forced King John to sign Magna Carta, which guaranteed the English barons certain liberties and established that the king's powers were not absolute. King Charles I was executed in 1649, and the Commonwealth of England was established as a republic. Highly unpopular, the republic was ended in 1660, and the monarchy was restored under King Charles II. In 1687–88, the Glorious Revolution and the overthrow of King James II established the principles of constitutional monarchy, which would later be worked out by Locke and other thinkers. However, absolute monarchy, justified by Hobbes in Leviathan (1651), remained a prominent principle elsewhere.

Following the Glorious Revolution, William III and Mary II were established as constitutional monarchs, with less power than their predecessor James II. Since then, royal power has become more ceremonial, with powers such as refusal to assent last exercised in 1708 by Queen Anne. Once part of the United Kingdom (1801–1922), southern Ireland rejected monarchy and became the Republic of Ireland in 1949. Support for a ceremonial monarchy remains high in Britain: Queen Elizabeth II (r. 1952–2022), possessed wide support from the U.K.'s population.

Vatican City State

edit

The Vatican City State is considered to be Europe's last absolute monarchy. The microstate is headed by the Pope, who doubles as its monarch according to the Vatican constitution. The nation was formed under Pope Pius XI in 1929, following the signing of the Lateran Treaty. It was the successor state to the Papal States, which collapsed under Pope Pius IX in 1870. Pope Francis (in office from 2013) serves as the nation's absolute monarch.

North America

edit

Canada

edit

Canada possesses one of the world's oldest continuous monarchies, having been established in the 16th century. Queen Elizabeth II had served as its sovereign since her ascension to the throne in 1952 until her death in 2022. Her son, King Charles III, now sits on the throne.

Costa Rica

edit

The struggle between monarchists and republicans led to the Costa Rican civil war of 1823. Costa Rican monarchists include Joaquín de Oreamuno y Muñoz de la Trinidad, José Santos Lombardo y Alvarado and José Rafael Gallegos Alvarado. Costa Rica stands out for being one of the few countries with foreign monarchism, that is, where the monarchists did not intend to establish an indigenous monarchy. Costa Rican monarchists were loyal to Emperor Agustín de Iturbide of the First Mexican Empire.

 
Old colonial coat of arms of Honduras with monarchical elements

Honduras

edit

After the independence of the general captaincy of Guatemala from the Spanish empire, she joined the First Mexican Empire for a brief period, this unleashed the division of the Honduran elites. These were divided between the annexationists, made up mostly of illustrious Spanish-descendant families and members of the conservative party who supported the idea of being part of an empire, and the liberals who wanted Central America to be a separate nation under a republican system.

The greatest example of this separation was in the two most important cities of the province, on the one hand Comayagua, which firmly supported the legitimacy of Iturbide I as emperor and remained a pro-monarchist bastion in Honduras, and on the other hand Tegucigalpa who supported the idea of forming a federation of Central American states under a republican system.

 
Emperor Iturbide of México

Mexico

edit

After obtaining independence from Spain, the First Mexican Empire was established under Emperor Agustín I. His reign lasted less than one year, and he was forcefully deposed. In 1864, the Second Mexican Empire was formed under Emperor Maximilian I. Maximilian's government enjoyed French aid, but opposition from America, and collapsed after three years. Much like Agustín I, Maximilian I was deposed and later executed by his republican enemies. Since 1867, Mexico has not possessed a monarchy.

Today, some Mexican monarchist organizations advocate for Maximilian von Götzen-Iturbide or Carlos Felipe de Habsburgo to be instated as the Emperor of Mexico.

Nicaragua

edit

The miskito ethnic group inhabits part of the Atlantic coast of Honduras and Nicaragua, by the beginning of the 17th century the said ethnic group was reorganized under a single chief known as Ta Uplika, for the reign of his grandson King Oldman I this group had a very close relationship With the English, they managed to turn the Mosquitia coast into an English protectorate that would decline in the 19th century until it completely disappeared in 1894 with the abdication of Robert II.[32]

Currently, the Miskitos who are shot between the two countries have denounced the neglect of their communities and abuses committed by the authorities. As a result of this, in Nicaragua several Miskito people began a movement of separatism from present-day Nicaragua and a re-institution of the monarchy.

United States

edit

English settlers first established the colony of Jamestown in 1607, taking its name after King James VI and I. For 169 years, the Thirteen Colonies were ruled by the authority of the British crown. The Thirteen American Colonies possessed a total of 10 monarchs, ending with George III. During the American Revolutionary War, the colonies declared independence from Britain in 1776. Despite erroneous popular belief, the Revolutionary war was in fact fought over independence, not anti-monarchism as is commonly believed. In fact, many American colonists who fought in the war against George III were monarchists themselves, who opposed George, but desired to possess a different king. Additionally, the American colonists received the financial support of Louis XVI and Charles III of Spain during the war.

After the U.S. declared its independence, the form of government by which it would operate still remained unsettled. At least two of America's Founding Fathers, Alexander Hamilton and Nathaniel Gorham, believed that America should be an independent monarchy. Various proposals to create an American monarchy were considered, including the Prussian scheme which would have made Prince Henry of Prussia king of the United States. Hamilton proposed that the leader of America should be an elected monarch, while Gorham pushed for a hereditary monarchy.[33][34] U.S. military officer Lewis Nicola also desired for America to be a monarchy, suggesting George Washington accept the crown of America, which he declined. All attempts ultimately failed, and America was founded a Republic.

During the American Civil War, a return to monarchy was considered as a way to solve the crisis, though it never came to fruition. Since then, the idea has possessed low support, but has been advocated by some public figures such as Ralph Adams Cram, Solange Hertz, Leland B. Yeager, Michael Auslin, Charles A. Coulombe, and Curtis Yarvin.

South America

edit

Brazil

edit

From gaining its independence in 1822 until 1889, Brazil was governed as a constitutional monarchy with a branch of the Portuguese Royal Family serving as monarchs. Prior to this period, Brazil had been a royal colony which had also served briefly as the seat of government for the Portuguese Empire following the occupation of that country by Napoleon Bonaparte in 1808. The history of the Empire of Brazil was marked by brief periods of political instability, several wars that Brazil won, and a marked increase in immigration which saw the arrival of both Jews and Protestants who were attracted by Brazil's reputation for religious tolerance. The final decades of the Empire under the reign of Pedro II saw a remarkable period of relative peace both at home and internationally, coupled with dramatic economic expansion, the extension of basic civil rights to most people and the gradual restriction of slavery, culminating in its final abolition in 1888. It is also remembered for its thriving culture and arts. However, Pedro II had little interest in preserving the monarchy and passively accepted its overthrow by a military coup d'état in 1889 resulting in the establishment of a dictatorship known as the First Brazilian Republic.[35]

Current monarchies

edit

The majority of current monarchies are constitutional monarchies. In a constitutional monarchy the power of the monarch is restricted by either a written or unwritten constitution, this should not be confused with a ceremonial monarchy, in which the monarch holds only symbolic power and plays very little to no part in government or politics. In some constitutional monarchies the monarch does play a more active role in political affairs than in others. In Thailand, for instance, King Bhumibol Adulyadej, who reigned from 1946 to 2016, played a critical role in the nation's political agenda and in various military coups. Similarly, in Morocco, King Mohammed VI wields significant, but not absolute power.

Liechtenstein is a democratic principality whose citizens have voluntarily given more power to their monarch in recent years.

There remain a handful of countries in which the monarchy is an absolute monarchy. The majority of these countries are oil-producing Arab Islamic monarchies like Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates. Other strong monarchies include Brunei and Eswatini.

Country Sovereign
  Andorra Co-Prince Emmanuel Macron
Co-Prince Joan Enric Vives i Sicília
  Antigua and Barbuda King Charles III
  Australia
  Bahamas
  Belize
  Canada
  Grenada
  Jamaica
  New Zealand
  Papua New Guinea
  Saint Kitts and Nevis
  Saint Lucia
  Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
  Solomon Islands
  Tuvalu
  United Kingdom
  Bahrain King Hamad bin Isa
  Belgium King Philippe
  Bhutan King Jigme Khesar Namgyel
  Brunei Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah
  Cambodia King Norodom Sihamoni
  Denmark King Frederik X
  Eswatini King Mswati III
  Japan Emperor Naruhito
  Jordan King Abdullah II
  Kuwait Emir Mishal Al-Ahmad
  Lesotho King Letsie III
  Liechtenstein Prince Hans-Adam II
  Luxembourg Grand Duke Henri
  Malaysia Sultan Ibrahim
  Monaco Sovereign Prince Albert II
  Morocco King Mohammed VI
  Kingdom of the Netherlands King Willem-Alexander
  Norway King Harald V
  Oman Sultan Haitham bin Tariq
  Qatar Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani
  Saudi Arabia King Salman
  Spain King Felipe VI
  Sweden King Carl XVI Gustaf
  Thailand King Vajiralongkorn
  Tonga King Tupou VI
  United Arab Emirates Sheikh Mohamed bin Zayed Al Nahyan
  Vatican City Pope Francis

Political philosophy

edit

Absolute monarchy stands as an opposition to anarchism and, additionally since the Age of Enlightenment; liberalism, capitalism, communism and socialism.

Otto von Habsburg advocated a form of constitutional monarchy based on the primacy of the supreme judicial function, with hereditary succession, mediation by a tribunal is warranted if suitability is problematic.[36][37]

Non-partisanship

edit

British political scientist Vernon Bogdanor justifies monarchy on the grounds that it provides for a nonpartisan head of state, separate from the head of government, and thus ensures that the highest representative of the country, at home and internationally, does not represent a particular political party, but all people.[38] Bogdanor also notes that monarchies can play a helpful unifying role in a multinational state, noting that "In Belgium, it is sometimes said that the king is the only Belgian, everyone else being either Fleming or Walloon" and that the British sovereign can belong to all of the United Kingdom's constituent countries (England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland), without belonging to any particular one of them.[38]

Private interest

edit

Thomas Hobbes wrote that the private interest of the monarchy is the same with the public. The riches, power, and humour of a monarch arise only from the riches, strength, and reputation of his subjects. An elected Head of State is incentivised to increase his own wealth for leaving office after a few years whereas a monarch has no reason to corrupt because he would be cheating himself.[d]

Wise counsel

edit

Thomas Hobbes wrote that a monarch can receive wise counsel with secrecy while an assembly cannot. Advisors to the assembly tend to be well-versed more in the acquisition of their own wealth than of knowledge; are likely to give their advices in long discourses which often excite men into action but do not govern them in it, moved by the flame of passion instead of enlightenment. Their multitude is a weakness.[e]

Long termism

edit

Thomas Hobbes wrote that the resolutions of a monarch are subject to no inconsistency save for human nature; in assemblies, inconsistencies arise from the number. For in an assembly, as little as the absence of a few or the diligent appearance of a few of the contrary opinion, "undoes today all that was done yesterday".[f]

Civil war reduction

edit

Thomas Hobbes wrote that a monarch cannot disagree with himself, out of envy or interest, but an assembly may and to such a height that may produce a civil war.[g]

Liberty

edit

The International Monarchist League, founded in 1943, has always sought to promote monarchy on the grounds that it strengthens popular liberty, both in a democracy and in a dictatorship, because by definition the monarch is not beholden to politicians.

British-American libertarian writer Matthew Feeney argues that European constitutional monarchies "have managed for the most part to avoid extreme politics"—specifically fascism, communism, and military dictatorship—"in part because monarchies provide a check on the wills of populist politicians" by representing entrenched customs and traditions.[39] Feeny notes that

European monarchies—such as the Danish, Belgian, Swedish, Dutch, Norwegian, and British—have ruled over countries that are among the most stable, prosperous, and free in the world.[39]

Socialist writer George Orwell argued a similar point, that constitutional monarchy is effective at preventing the development of fascism.

"The function of the King in promoting stability and acting as a sort of keystone in a non-democratic society is, of course, obvious. But he also has, or can have, the function of acting as an escape-valve for dangerous emotions. A French journalist said to me once that the monarchy was one of the things that have saved Britain from Fascism...It is at any rate possible that while this division of function exists a Hitler or a Stalin cannot come to power. On the whole the European countries which have most successfully avoided Fascism have been constitutional monarchies... I have often advocated that a Labour government, i.e. one that meant business, would abolish titles while retaining the Royal Family.’[40]

Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn took a different approach, arguing that liberty and equality are contradictions. As such, he argued that attempts to establish greater social equality through the abolishment of monarchy, ultimately results in a greater loss of liberty for citizens. He believed that equality can only be accomplished through the suppression of liberty, as humans are naturally unequal and hierarchical. Kuehnelt-Leddihn also believed that people are on average freer under monarchies than they are under democratic republics, as the latter tends to more easily become tyrannical through ochlocracy. In Liberty or Equality, he writes:

There is little doubt that the American Congress or the French Chambers have a power over their nations which would rouse the envy of a Louis XIV or a George III, were they alive today. Not only prohibition, but also the income tax declaration, selective service, obligatory schooling, the fingerprinting of blameless citizens, premarital blood tests—none of these totalitarian measures would even the royal absolutism of the seventeenth century have dared to introduce.[41]

Hans-Hermann Hoppe also argues that monarchy helps to preserve individual liberty more effectively than democracy.[42]

Natural desire for hierarchy

edit

In a 1943 essay in The Spectator, "Equality", British author C.S. Lewis criticized egalitarianism, and its corresponding call for the abolition of monarchy, as contrary to human nature, writing,

A man's reaction to Monarchy is a kind of test. Monarchy can easily be 'debunked'; but watch the faces, mark well the accents, of the debunkers. These are the men whose tap-root in Eden has been cut: whom no rumour of the polyphony, the dance, can reach—men to whom pebbles laid in a row are more beautiful than an arch...Where men are forbidden to honour a king they honour millionaires, athletes, or film-stars instead: even famous prostitutes or gangsters. For spiritual nature, like bodily nature, will be served; deny it food and it will gobble poison.[43]

Political accountability

edit

Oxford political scientists Petra Schleiter and Edward Morgan-Jones wrote that in monarchies, it is more common to hold elections than non-electoral replacements.[44]

Notable works

edit

Notable works arguing in favor of monarchy include

Support for monarchy

edit

Current monarchies

edit
Country Polling firm/source Sample size Percentage of supporters Date conducted Ref.
  Antigua and Barbuda Lord Ashcroft Polls 510 45% February and March 2023 [45]
  Australia Essential 1,125 48% April 2023 [46]
  Belgium IVOX 1,000 58% September 2017 [47]
  Canada Nanos Research 1,001 48% June 2022 [48]
  Denmark Gallup 82% 2014 [49]
  Jamaica Lord Ashcroft Polls 510 40% February and March 2023 [45]
  Japan Mainichi Shimbun 74% April 2019 [50]
  Lesotho Afrobarometer 75% June 2018 [51]
  Morocco Le Monde 1,108 91% March 2009 [52]
  Netherlands EenVandaag 56% April 2024 [53]
  New Zealand Lord Ashcroft Polls 2,012 44% February and March 2023 [54]
  Norway Nettavisen 20,000 84% 2022
  Saint Vincent Government constitutional referendum 52,262 56.3% November 2009
  Spain Spain 65.7% January 2024 [55]
  Sweden Novus 71% January 2023 [56]
  Thailand Suan Dusit Rajabhat University 5,700 75% October 2020 [57]
  Tuvalu Government constitutional referendum 1,939 64.9% April 2008 [58]
  United Kingdom Ipsos 2,166 81% May 2024

Former monarchies

edit

The following is a list of former monarchies and their percentage of public support for monarchism.

Country Claimant or most recent royal house Polling firm/source Sample size Percentage of supporters Date conducted Ref.
  Austria Habsburg-Lorraine [note 2] [note 2] 20%[note 2] [note 2] [59]
  Barbados Windsor University of the West Indies 500 12% November 2021 [60]
  Brazil Orléans-Braganza Círculo Monárquico Brasileiro 188 32% September 2019 [61]
  Croatia Habsburg-Lorraine[h] Consilium Regium Croaticum 1,759 41% 2019 [62]
  Czech Republic Habsburg-Lorraine[h] SC&C Market Research 13% 2018 [63]
  France Bourbon/Orléans/Bonaparte BVA Group 953 17% March 2007 [64]
  Georgia Bagrationi Doctrina 560 78.9% July 2015 [65]
  Germany Hohenzollern IamExpat 1,041 15%[i] 2023 [66]
  Greece Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg-Glücksburg Kappa Research 2,040 18% April 2007 [67]
  Hungary Habsburg-Lorraine[h] Azonnali 3,541 46% May 2021 [68]
  Iran Pahlavi Gmaan 16,850 22% 2022 [69]
  Italy Savoy Piepoli institute 15% 2018 [70]
  Mexico Iturbide/Habsburg-Lorraine Parametría 7.6% July 2014 [71]
  Nepal Gorkha Interdisciplinary Analysts 3,000 49% January 2008 [72]
  Portugal Braganza-Coburg Catholic University of Portugal/Diário de Notícias 1,148 11% March 2010 [73]
  Romania Romania Stiri pe surse 37% 2018 [74]
  Russia Holstein-Gottorp-Romanov Russian Public Opinion Research Center ~1,800 28%[note 3] March 2017 [75]
  Serbia Karađorđević Blic 1,615 49.8% July 2015 [76]
  South Korea Yi Naver News 40.4% 2010 [77]
  Turkey Osman MetroPOLL 1,691 3% October 2023 [78]
  United States Brunswick-Lüneburg[j] YouGov 1,500 12% May 2023 [79]

Notable monarchists

edit

Several notable public figures who advocated for monarchy or are monarchists include:

Arts and entertainment

edit

Clergy

edit

Philosophy

edit

Politics

edit

Monarchist movements and parties

edit

Criticism

edit

Criticism of monarchy can be targeted against the general form of governmentmonarchy—or more specifically, to particular monarchical governments as controlled by hereditary royal families. In some cases, this criticism can be curtailed by legal restrictions and be considered criminal speech, as in lèse-majesté. Monarchies in Europe and their underlying concepts, such as the Divine Right of Kings, were often criticized during the Age of Enlightenment, which notably paved the way to the French Revolution and the proclamation of the abolition of the monarchy in France. Earlier, the American Revolution had seen the Patriots suppress the Loyalists and expel all royal officials. In this century, monarchies are present in the world in many forms with different degrees of royal power and involvement in civil affairs:

The twentieth century, beginning with the 1917 February Revolution in Russia and accelerated by two world wars, saw many European countries replace their monarchies with republics, while others replaced their absolute monarchies with constitutional monarchies. Reverse movements have also occurred, with brief returns of the monarchy in France under the Bourbon Restoration, the July Monarchy, and the Second French Empire, the Stuarts after the English Civil War and the Bourbons in Spain after the Franco dictatorship.

See also

edit

Notes

edit
  1. ^ Chapters LVIII-LXIV
  2. ^ a b c d Figures for Austria is the average percentage of supporters from several opinion polls taken prior to November 2018; as reported by EFE.
  3. ^ Among respondents, 22 per cent answered that they were not opposed to a monarchy in principle, but could not think of a person "worthy of the Russian throne", whereas 6 per cent believed there was.
  4. ^ Some activists within the sovereignty movement advocate for a restoration of the Hawaiian monarchy, while others push for an independent Hawaiian Republic.
  1. ^ While the Xia dynasty is typically considered to be the first orthodox Chinese dynasty, numerous sources including the Book of Documents mention two other dynasties that preceded the Xia: the "Tang" () and the "Yu" () dynasties.[10][11][12][13] The former is sometimes called the "Ancient Tang" (古唐) to distinguish it from other dynasties named "Tang".[14] Should the historicity of these earlier dynasties be attested, Yu the Great would not have been the initiator of dynastic rule in China.
  2. ^ All attempts at restoring monarchical and dynastic rule in China following the Xinhai Revolution ended in failure. Hence, the abdication of the Xuantong Emperor in AD 1912 is typically regarded as the formal end of the Chinese monarchy.
  3. ^ In English, the use of the term Mikado (帝/御門) for the emperor was once common but is now considered obsolete.[17]
  4. ^ Leviathan, 19.4, pp.124-5
  5. ^ Leviathan, 19.5, p.125
  6. ^ Leviathan, 19.6, p.125
  7. ^ Leviathan, 19.7, p.125
  8. ^ a b c as part of Austria-Hungary
  9. ^ Whilst the percentage of people who supported the return of monarchy was 8%. However, 14 percent were in favour, and among “right-wing voters”, 15 percent supported the idea.
  10. ^ in their capacity as monarchs of Great Britain

References

edit
  1. ^ Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language, 1989 edition, p. 924.
  2. ^ Bohn, H. G. (1849). The Standard Library Cyclopedia of Political, Constitutional, Statistical and Forensic Knowledge. p. 640. A republic, according to the modern usage of the word, signifies a political community which is not under monarchical government ... in which one person does not possess the entire sovereign power.
  3. ^ "Definition of Republic". Merriam-Webster Dictionary. Retrieved 2017-02-18. a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch ... a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law
  4. ^ "The definition of republic". Dictionary.com. Retrieved 2017-02-18. a state in which the supreme power rests in the body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by representatives chosen directly or indirectly by them. ... a state in which the head of government is not a monarch or other hereditary head of state.
  5. ^ "Sumerian King List" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 10 November 2013. Retrieved 7 April 2012.
  6. ^ Conrad Phillip Kottak (1991). Cultural Anthropology. McGraw-Hill. p. 124. ISBN 978-0-07-035615-3.
  7. ^ A. Adu Boahen; J. F. Ade Ajayi; Michael Tidy (1986). Topics in West African History. Longman Group. p. 19. ISBN 978-0-582-58504-1.
  8. ^ "Enlightenment". HISTORY. 21 February 2020. Retrieved 2020-06-22.
  9. ^ "A beginner's guide to the Age of Enlightenment (article)". Khan Academy. Retrieved 2020-06-22.
  10. ^ Nadeau, Randall (2012). The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Chinese Religions. John Wiley & Sons. p. 31. ISBN 9781444361971.
  11. ^ Yeo, Khiok-Khng (2008). Musing with Confucius and Paul: Toward a Chinese Christian Theology. James Clarke & Company Limited. p. 24. ISBN 9780227903308.
  12. ^ Chao, Yuan-ling (2009). Medicine and Society in Late Imperial China: A Study of Physicians in Suzhou, 1600–1850. Peter Lang. p. 73. ISBN 9781433103810.
  13. ^ Wang, Shumin (2002). "夏、商、周之前还有个虞朝". Hebei Academic Journal. 22 (1): 146–147. Retrieved 20 August 2020.
  14. ^ "远古时期的"古唐朝"?比夏朝还早1600年,如被证实历史或将改写". 9 November 2019. Retrieved 21 June 2022.
  15. ^ Skutsch, Carl (2013). Encyclopedia of the World's Minorities. Routledge. p. 287. ISBN 9781135193881.
  16. ^ "Tennō". Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved 12 August 2021.
  17. ^ Kanʼichi Asakawa. The early institutional life of Japan: a study in the reform of 645 A.D.. Tokyo: Shueisha (1903), p. 25. "We purposely avoid, in spite of its wide usage in foreign literature, the misleading term Mikado. If it be not for the natural curiosity of the races, which always seeks something novel and loves to call foreign things by foreign names, it is hard to understand why this obsolete and ambiguous word should so sedulously be retained. It originally meant not only the Sovereign, but also his house, the court, and even the State, and its use in historical writings causes many difficulties which it is unnecessary to discuss here in detail. The native Japanese employ the term neither in speech nor in writing. It might as well be dismissed with great advantage from sober literature as it has been for the official documents."
  18. ^ "最高裁判所判例集 事件番号 平成1(行ツ)126". Supreme Court of Japan. Retrieved August 10, 2020.
  19. ^ Hoye, Timothy. (1999). Japanese Politics: Fixed and Floating Worlds, p. 78; "According to legend, the first Japanese emperor was Jinmu. Along with the next 13 emperors, Jimmu is not considered an actual, historical figure. Historically verifiable Emperors of Japan date from the early sixth century with Kinmei."
  20. ^ Henshall, Kenneth (2013). Historical Dictionary of Japan to 1945. Scarecrow Press. p. 100. ISBN 978-0-8108-7872-3.
  21. ^ Nussbaum, Louis-Frédéric. (2005). "Kamakura-jidai" in Japan Encyclopedia, p. 459.
  22. ^ Totman, Conrad (1966). "Political Succession in The Tokugawa Bakufu: Abe Masahiro's Rise to Power, 1843–1845". Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies. 26: 102–124. doi:10.2307/2718461. JSTOR 2718461.
  23. ^ "Meiji Constitution | 1889, Japan". Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved 2017-08-21.
  24. ^ "The Constitution of Japan". Prime Minister of Japan and His Cabinet. Retrieved 8 July 2021.
  25. ^ Oda, Hiroshi (2009). "Sources of Law". Japanese Law. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199232185.001.1. ISBN 978-0-19-923218-5.
  26. ^ Wasserman, Janek (2014). "Österreichische Aktion: Monarchism, Authoritarianism, and the Unity of the Austrian Conservative Ideological Field during the First Republic". Central European History. 47 (1): 76–104. doi:10.1017/S0008938914000636. ISSN 0008-9389. JSTOR 43280409. S2CID 145335762.
  27. ^ Guyotjeannin, Olivier, ed. (1996). Clovis chez les historiens (in French). Librairie Droz. pp. 241ff. ISBN 9782600055925.
  28. ^ Sewell, Elizabeth Missing (1876). Popular History of France. Longman. pp. 48–49.
  29. ^ Asmuss, Burkhard (27 January 2023). "Die Deutschnationale Volkspartei (DNVP)" [German National People's Party (DNVP)]. Deutsches Historisches Museum (in German). Retrieved 30 May 2023.
  30. ^ Gazzetta Ufficiale n. 134 del 20 giugno 1946
  31. ^ Casanova, Julián (29 July 2010) [2007]. The Spanish Republic and Civil War. Translated by Douch, Martin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (published 2010). p. 1. ISBN 9781139490573. Retrieved 10 September 2022. [...] the local elections of 12 April [...] turned into a plebiscite between Monarchy and republicanism. It was soon clear that the republicans had won in most of the provincial capitals. [...] Alfonso XIII abdicated, and a good many cities and towns proclaimed the Republic on 14 April 1931.
  32. ^ "BBC Mundo - América Latina - los miskitos luchan por su independencia".
  33. ^ Hamilton, Alexander (1962). The Papers of Alexander Hamilton, Volume 9. New York: Columbia University Press. ISBN 0-231-08903-1
  34. ^ Krauel, Richard (October 1911). "Prince Henry of Prussia and the Regency of the United States, 1786". The American Historical Review. 17 (1): 44–51. doi:10.1086/ahr/17.1.44.
  35. ^ Enciclopédia Barsa. Rio de Janeiro: Encyclopædia Britannica do Brasil.
  36. ^ "Untitled Document". home1.gte.net. Archived from the original on 10 February 2001. Retrieved 11 January 2022.
  37. ^ Otto von Habsburg "Monarchy or Republic?". ("Excerpted from The Conservative Tradition in European Thought, Copyright 1970 by Educational Resources Corporation.")
  38. ^ a b Bogdanor, Vernon (6 December 2000). "The Guardian has got it wrong". The Guardian.
  39. ^ a b Feeney, Matthew (July 25, 2013). "The Benefits of Monarchy". Reason magazine.
  40. ^ Orwell, George. Spring 1944 Partisan Review
  41. ^ Liberty or Equality: The Challenge of Our Time. The Mises Institute. 2014. p. 10.
  42. ^ David Gordon, Review of Hans-Hermann Hoppe, Democracy: The God that Failed, "The Mises Review" of Ludwig von Mises Institute, Volume 8, Number 1, Spring 2002; Volume 8, Number 1.
  43. ^ C.S. Lewis (26 August 1943). "Equality". The Spectator.
  44. ^ Matthews, Dylan (13 July 2013). "Shut up, royal baby haters. Monarchy is awesome". The Washington Post.
  45. ^ a b "The monarchy: the view from the "Commonwealth realms"". Lord Ashcroft Polls. 5 May 2023.
  46. ^ "Support for a Republic". Essential Research. 15 May 2023.
  47. ^ "Kwart van de Belgen wil republiek in plaats van monarchie". HLN.be. 17 September 2017.
  48. ^ Otis, Daniel (1 June 2022). "Majority of Canadians want Queen to apologize for residential schools: survey". Nanos Research.
  49. ^ "What do the Danes think of their Royal Family and what role does the Danish Monarchy have?". YourDanishLife. 7 January 2022.
  50. ^ "74% back emperor as symbol of state defined by current Constitution: Mainichi poll". Mainichi Daily News. 2019-05-03. Retrieved 2023-06-24.
  51. ^ "'We need the king!' Lesotho fed up with politicians' mistakes". TimesLive. 11 June 2018.
  52. ^ "Government bans Le Monde opinion poll on royalty". 8 March 2009.
  53. ^ "Steun voor de monarchie". EenVandaag (in Dutch). Retrieved 2024-05-06.
  54. ^ "The monarchy: the view from the "Commonwealth realms"". Lord Ashcroft Polls. 5 May 2023.
  55. ^ "Sociometric Survey (Jan 6): 58,6% support the Monarchy". Electomania (in Spanish). 2024-01-06. Retrieved 2024-02-07.
  56. ^ "TV4". 2023.
  57. ^ Morris, James; Nyugen, Son (25 October 2020). "Strength of support for the monarchy being seen this week as political unrest deepens into standoff". Thai Examiner.
  58. ^ "Tuvaluans vote against Republic". 30 April 2008. Archived from the original on 28 December 2008.
  59. ^ "A century after Austrian-Hungarian Empire's fall, some nostalgic for monarchy". www.efe.com. EFE, S.A. 11 November 2018. Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  60. ^ "Survey shows support for republic". Barbados Today. 21 December 2021.
  61. ^ "CMB Pesquisa de conhecimento e opinião pública" (in Portuguese). 27 September 2019. Retrieved 16 February 2020.
  62. ^ Thomas, Mark. "Two-fifths of Croatians want a return to the monarchy". www.thedubrovniktimes.com. The Dubrovnik Times. Retrieved 26 January 2019.
  63. ^ "Průzkum ke 100 rokům od vzniku Československa: kdyby se monarchie nerozpadla, měli bychom se lépe nebo stejně". iROZHLAS (in Czech). Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  64. ^ "BVA Group - Société d'études et conseil" (PDF). BVA. Archived from the original (PDF) on 20 March 2019. Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  65. ^ Kikacheishvili, Tamar (17 April 2017). "Georgia: Five-Year-Old Prince Prepares to Reign". Eurasianet. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  66. ^ Wedia. "8 percent of Germans want a monarchy". IamExpat. Retrieved 2024-10-15.
  67. ^ "Το ΒΗΜΑ onLine - ΠΟΛΙΤΙΚΑ" (in Greek). 25 April 2007. Archived from the original on 25 April 2007. Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  68. ^ "GYŐZTEK A HABSBURGOK: AZ AZONNALI OLVASÓINAK 46 SZÁZALÉKA ÚJRA KIRÁLYSÁGOT SZERETNE". azonnali.hu. 17 May 2021.
  69. ^ "Iranians' Attitudes toward Political Systems: A 2022 Survey Report – Gamaan". gamaan.org. Retrieved 2024-10-15.
  70. ^ "Emanule Filiberto: "Politici? Sono dei parac***"". Occhio, il Savoia vuole fare il re" (in Italian). Retrieved 3 December 2018.
  71. ^ "¿Qué opinan los mexicanos de la Monarquía?". Parametría (in Spanish). Retrieved 18 June 2021.
  72. ^ Sengupta, Somini (3 April 2008). "In Nepal, Long-Lived Monarchy Fades From View". The New York Times. Retrieved 31 December 2019.
  73. ^ "Portugueses optam com clareza pela república" [Portuguese opt clearly for the Republic]. Diário de Notícias (in Portuguese). Retrieved 13 September 2021.
  74. ^ "SONDAJ - Românii spun PAS monarhiei: SURPRIZĂ în topul personalităților apreciate din Casa Regală". Stiri pe surse (in Romanian). 2018-01-31. Retrieved 2024-10-15.
  75. ^ Galanina, Angelina (23 March 2017). "Россияне против монархии". Izvestia (in Russian). National Media Group. Retrieved 20 April 2020.
  76. ^ "ANKETA Da li Srbija treba da bude monarhija?". Blic.rs (in Serbian). 2015-07-27. Retrieved 2024-10-15.
  77. ^ "황실 복원…찬성 41% vs 반대 23%". n.news.naver.com (in Korean). Retrieved 2024-10-15.
  78. ^ "MetroPOLL anketi: "Türkiye'nin nabzı, Atatürk, cumhuriyet ve laiklik diye atıyor"". medyascope.tv (in Turkish). November 2023. Retrieved 2023-11-08.
  79. ^ "Three in five Americans say it would be bad for the U.S. to have a monarchy". YouGov. 5 May 2023.
  80. ^ "Balzac: A Fight Against Decandence and Materialism". Mtholyoke.edu. Archived from the original on 30 June 2016. Retrieved 26 November 2017.
  81. ^ Brody, Richard (24 March 2021). "Looking Behind Éric Rohmer's Cinematic Style". The New Yorker.
  82. ^ "Joan Collins so happy with husband". 21 January 2012.
  83. ^ Stephen, Fry (30 June 2017). "Happy Birthday, America. One Small Suggestion". The New York Times.
  84. ^ Aquinas, Thomas. De Regno, to the King of Cyprus
  85. ^ Bellarmine, Robert. On the Roman Pontiff.
  86. ^ Bossuet, Jacques-Bénigne. Politics Drawn from the Very Words of Holy Scripture
  87. ^ Pius VI, Pourquoi Notre Voix
  88. ^ Coulombe, Charles A. (2003). A History of the Popes: Vicars of Christ. MJF Books. p. 392.
  89. ^ White, Steven F. (2020). Modern Italy's Founding Fathers: The Making of a Postwar Republic. Bloomsbury Publishing. pp. 108–109.
  90. ^ Mammarealla, Giuseppe (1966). Italy After Fascism A Political History 1943–1965. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. p. 114.
  91. ^ Alighieri, Dante. De Monarchia
  92. ^ Filmer, Robert (1680). Patriarcha.
  93. ^ Sommerville, J.P. (1992). Thomas Hobbes: Political Ideas in Historical Context. MacMillan. pp. 256–324. ISBN 978-0-333-49599-5.
  94. ^ Beum, Robert (1997). "Ultra-Royalism Revisited", Modern Age, Vol. 39, No. 3, p. 305.
  95. ^ Garff, Joachim. Søren Kierkegaard: A Biography. p. 487.
  96. ^ "Charles Maurras on the French Revolution · Liberty, Equality, Fraternity". Roy Rosenzweig Center for History and New Media. Archived from the original on 6 January 2020. Retrieved 12 April 2019.
  97. ^ Cram, Ralph Adams (1936). "Invitation to Monarchy".
  98. ^ Bogdanor, Vernon (6 December 2000). "The Guardian has got it wrong". The Guardian.
  99. ^ "'A Focus of Loyalty Higher Than the State : The monarchy created peace in Central Europe, and its loss precipitated 70 years of conflict.' by Roger Scruton". Los Angeles Times. 1991-06-16.
  100. ^ Hermann-Hoppe, Hans. Democracy: The God that Failed.
  101. ^ Chateubriand. Of Buonaparte, and the Bourbons, and of the Necessity of Rallying Round Our Legitimate Princes
  102. ^ "Monarhia salvează PSD. Tăriceanu şi Bădălău susţin un referendum pe tema monarhiei. Când ar avea loc acesta". 18 December 2017.
  103. ^ Civil Georgia (2007-10-08). "Civil.Ge - Politicians Comment on Constitutional Monarchy Proposal". www.civil.ge.
  104. ^ Pearlman, Johnathan (7 September 2013). "Ten things you didn't know about Tony Abbott". telegraph.co.uk. Telegraph Media Group Limited. Archived from the original on 2022-01-12. Retrieved 19 Nov 2013.
  105. ^ Johnson, Carol; Wanna, John; Lee, Hsu-Ann (2015). Abbott's Gambit: The 2013 Australian Federal Election. ANU Press. p. 281. ISBN 978-1-9250-2209-4.
  106. ^ Viegas, Nonato (November 16, 2017). "Líder de movimento que pediu impeachment de Dilma agora é monarquista". ÉPOCA.
edit