Campus card

 

The functions of the campus credential, in addition to data storage for the student's identification, vary by University. Some examples of campus credential functions are:

• Building access (Classroom, Residence Halls, Recreational Facilities, Libraries, Dining Facilities, Lockers, etc.)
• Equipment access (Computers, Copy machines, Printers, etc.)
• Transportation access (Campus and/or Public Transportation, Parking Permits, Ride Sharing, Bike Rentals, etc.)
• Cashless payment for Dining, Vending, Laundry, and at campus retail locations
• Mobile banking
• Library card
• Time and attendance control
• Exam registration
• Mobile phone and NFC Services

Campus credentials with multiple functions can help simplify internal administrative processes.

Electronic card access has been available on campuses since as early as 1968. Early versions, such as the “VALI-DINE” system at Rochester Institute of Technology, relied on cards with mechanically punched holes to allow access to their dining halls. In the years following, the use of campus credentials and technology has matured. In 1972, California State Polytechnic University installed the first known card-based system utilizing magnetic stripe technology. By 1985, the Harco multi-application, campus-wide system utilizing bar code, Prox contact-based chips and magnetic stripe technology was implemented by Duke University. Technological advances continued to pick up speed with both cashless payment systems introduced by Debitek Inc. and copy machine management introduced by DANYL Corporation in 1986. By the 1990s, universities began linking their campus cards to banks, with Florida State University being the first in 1990. DataCard introduced its first color digital imaging card production system in 1993. In 2001, contactless chip technology cards were introduced and CBORD released the first IP-addressable card reader for campus credential access systems. (Huber, 2007). Technology continued to ramp up, with cloud-based Campus Credential systems growing in popularity in 2005. By 2015, the use of smart devices instead of physical cards soared. And by 2020, wearable credentials, such as wristbands and fobs, gained popularity, along with mobile apps and digital wallets to manage credential functionality (Huber, n.d.).

• National Association of Campus Card Users. (n.d.) "About NACCU".
• Lv, Weichun (2013). "Design of Campus Smart Card System". Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Computer, Communication, Control and Automation. doi:10.2991/isccca.2013.120. ISBN 978-90-78677-63-5. S2CID 44239953.
• McKee, Mary K. "Policy-Based Access Controls". ID Pro Body of Knowledge, Volume 1, Issue 4, 2021.
• Thomas, Dawn. The Evolution of the Campus ID Card". College Services Magazine, Spring 2020.
• Kruger, Kevin. "Student Success: Mission-Critical". Rebecca Martin, George Mehaffy, John O'Brien. Educause Review. May 8, 2017.
• Hudson, Andrew. "New Senate Bill Could Require ALL Campus Cards to Feature Mental Health Resources". CR80News. January 22, 2021.
• Huber, Robert C. "A Brief History of the Campus Card Industry". CR80News. March 28, 2007.
• Huber, Robert C. and Associates. (n.d.) "Campus Card Technology Evolution (1960-2020)".
• Jaworowski, Caitlin. "Embracing Z Generation". College Services Magazine, Spring 2020.
• Duke University. (n.d.) "Symptom Monitoring – Duke United".
• Hudson, Andrew. "NC Colleges Weight Campus Cards for Voter ID". CR80News. March 1, 2019.
• Alabama Secretary of State. (n.d.) "Valid ID at the Polls".
• Travel.state.gov. (n.d.) "Photo Identification: Secondary IDs".
• Huber, Robert C. "The Campus Card Factory: Time for a New Business Model". University Business. April 13, 2017.
• Nealon, Sinead (Executive Director at European Campus Card Association) Email to Laurie Harris. August 23, 2022.
• ECCA Student eID Framework. Research, State-of-the-Art & Survey Findings Report. November 2021.

• European Campus Card Association
• National Association of Campus Card Users
• ESC-tension