User talk:Tim1965

Archives

June 2006 - December 2006 January 2007 - June 2007 July 2007 - December 2007 January 2008 - June 2008 July 2008 - December 2008 January 2009 - June 2009 July 2009 - December 2009 January 2010 - June 2010 July 2010 - December 2010 January 2011 - June 2011 July 2011 - December 2011 January 2012 - June 2012 July 2012 - December 2012 January 2013 - June 2013 July 2013 - December 2013 January 2014 - June 2014 July 2014 - December 2014 January 2015 - June 2015 July 2015 - December 2015 January 2016 - June 2016 July 2016 - December 2016 January to December 2017 2018 and 2019

Hi Tim. I've pinged you a couple times at Talk:Salvatore Todaro/GA1, but to my surprise, have yet to receive a response from you... This is perplexing because I had a small discussion with you above last summer about how I nominated these pages. The reviewer is very close to passing the article, it just needs a couple of quick adjustments, which would be great coming from you, in order to pass. The review has been on hold for almost a week now, would you please let me know if you are able to comment on this? Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 15:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weird. I only got the first ping. The others weren't showing up... huh. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting. No worries. Thanks for the help in the end, and congrats on the GA! Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 18:04, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, hope you're doing well. Please review some of the comments I've marked for you at Talk:Joseph Lonardo/GA1 when you've got time. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 19:19, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging still isn't working. I wonder what the heck is going on? It's not just you, either. Pinging by others isn't working, either. - Tim1965 (talk) 04:28, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for looking into some of those comments. Regarding the ping, I had forgotten to sign them with four tildes at first, so I knew they weren’t going to go through, so just messaged you directly. I can try doing another test ping on you to see if there is an underlying issue that perhaps you could raise at admin notice board or village pump. Regards, Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 05:53, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead, try that. I'd appreciate it. - Tim1965 (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please see the talk of Alfred Polizzi if you haven’t gotten the notification already. Thanks. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 03:27, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May I kindly ask you to take a look at Talk:Mustang#Final_draft? As you were pinged in the earlier debate and we now need consensus to unlock the article and fix it, your input will help. Montanabw^(talk) 16:41, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Long time, no harass. I was locked in a dungeon at the Crew and recently escaped. Anyway, do you have a widescreen monitor? If so, can you look at Sixteenth Street Historic District and tell me if the photo layout is wonky. My laptop isn't wide screen and the photos all fit in the article text, but I know it might look different on other screens. APK whisper in my ear 05:38, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• You were at the Eagle in Anacostia, and we all know it. There's a reason for their St. Andrews cross. Anyway, the layout looks fine on my widescreen monitor. A little crowding in the first section, but you can see it at 100 percent (whatever that means) here and at 125 percent here. (I find 125 percent more readable on my widescreen.) There's that "photos on both sides of text" (or whatever Wikipedia jargon is for that) at 100 percent. I don't think it is worth worrying about. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:15, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You got me. I was the reason the Eagle was shut down...neighbors heard screams. I removed the big map from the infobox and switched it with the historic district map. Gracias. APK whisper in my ear 17:19, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How could they hear screams with that ball gag in your mouth? :) And by "ball gag", you know what I mean. - Tim1965 (talk) 17:20, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just going to link here. APK whisper in my ear 17:31, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's me again Margaret. Do you still have access to the WaPo archives? I'm trying to find this article: "F.H. Brooke, 84, Dies; Renowned Architect." from December 25, 1960. I love how even though I have a WaPo subscription, I can't seem to access the archives. I must be going to the wrong pages or something. I have access to the NYT archives, but that doesn't do me a lot of good with most DC articles. APK whisper in my ear 04:45, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I do have access. How would you like it sent to you? - Tim1965 (talk) 04:50, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Just slip it through the gloryhole or either email. Unless there's another way/platform you can think of. APK whisper in my ear 04:52, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr...maybe screenshart it then I'll save the photo so you can delete it. APK whisper in my ear 04:56, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"F.H. Brooke, 82, Dies" is the real title.... FWIW. Here ya go. - Tim1965 (talk) 04:58, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Saved, gracias. APK whisper in my ear 05:07, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Umm I don't mean to make this a recurring thing, but can you find two more WaPo obits por favor? (Frank Russell White and Robert O. Scholz) Do you still have access via the DC library or is there some online sorcery on the WaPo site I'm not aware of? APK whisper in my ear 01:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have access through my public library. Don't you? I'll find them and post them via the usual fashion. Give me 30 mintues. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:10, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I've never tried. I thought only DC would have it since it's local. Oops... I'll try to find my library login. APK whisper in my ear 02:16, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I used to access via the WaPo site, but it was so slow and clumsy. My library's database is a zillion times faster and easier to use. Here is Scholz and here is White. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:21, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bless you my child. APK whisper in my ear 03:09, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Well I had no luck with the local library, but went to the DC library site and turns out you can be a member and have access to all the good stuff even if you live in Virginia (some counties, that is). I rejoined (no clue where my old library card is, it's been 7 years since we packed up and left Dupont) and just found the articles you linked to plus more and I'm a happy gay nerd right now. APK whisper in my ear 16:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You were a happy gay nerd before!! Now you just have less free time, because you can do research. :) - Tim1965 (talk) 17:58, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Master transaction agreement has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Near-identical duplicate of Master Services Agreement

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Darren-M talk 02:41, 25 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for posting this great history! There is an in complete sentence here: Canal Fund financial crisis of 1841 The Canal Fund Commission financially during Kelley's first year. [[1]] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dael4 (talk • contribs) 03:18, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Dangling edit! I fixed it. - Tim1965 (talk) 03:39, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Meamft2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:40, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing job on the Ivy City article. Just brilliant. (I realize this is five years too late.) ~ Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 23:15, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, thank you nonetheless! - Tim1965 (talk) 00:54, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I looked inside last weekend, it was depressing. But also neat to see that it was restored. Omega still has the sign even though it's a private residence now. The Eagle's old building on Benning Road might be designated a landmark, but it seems that's to avoid the building becoming a halfway house. APK whisper in my ear 02:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• "Sadlands" was wonderful. The upper lounge next to the postage stamp-sized dance floor was chock-a-block with bitchy twinks, the only not-clogged-with-drunks bar was in the hallway, and the video room played the best videos (even if no one danced there). Completely drunk one night in the mid-1990s, I took an absolutely naked man out of Badlands, walked around on P Street (my baseball cap covering what God gave him), got in a cab, and took him home. Frat House/Omega was not one of my faves, but that's usually because I hit Badlands so often. - Tim1965 (talk) 15:29, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article St. Gregory Hotel, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Gregory Hotel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Tim1965! I noticed that you're an extremely talented person and editor, and you seem so nice, so I was wondering if you'd be able to help me out! I am also very interested in films and actors, and I have edited quite a couple of articles such as yours, Carson MacCormac, and have created a multitude of articles, which almost all have been succesful. Besides one. I created an article for an actor in one of my favourite movies, Jesse Noah Gruman, and someone keeps on moving it back to the draft space telling me that it is under sourced, when we're at a point where I have a reference after every single sentence. He does not respond to my questions, so I was wondering if you could take a look at it and tell me what he means, or if you disagree with him, to accept it! I have the ability to move it to the main space myself, but I would rather not! It would be so greatly appreciated, you have no idea how much! :):) Thanks a bunch, Coreykai (talk) 00:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and Happy New Year from down near Pittsburgh. Sort of an off-the-wall question for you. I'm doing some genealogical research on members of my family who came over from Wales to mine anthracite up in Northeastern PA. In the US Census for 1900, one of these men had an occupation listed that I can't quite make out. It looks to me like "Bradisk Man," or something similar. He may have been employed in a colliery/breaker. Does that (or any similar) term ring any bells with you?

Will also send you this question via e-mail.

Thanks in advance,

Tom-in-Pittsburgh (talk) 18:40, 4 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• This term is not familiar to me at all. I did some searching on various terms and variations, too, and came up with nothing. - Tim1965 (talk) 02:22, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious

Nine years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It seems so long ago! - Tim1965 (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am the COI editor who wrote the draft BLP for Steve Salis. I found your name listed as one of the more active members of the Wiki Project: Washington DC. I recently made an edit request on the Talk:Steve Salis page, but unfortunately no one has come to the page who is willing to make the edits. I am hoping that you won't mind taking a look at my request, and see if you can help improve the page as requested, and take off the advert tag that is on the page now. Thanks a lot! SuzyforSalis (talk) 06:05, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Marvin Camel article needs work. Looks like some major edits made when a book came out about him, but sounds like PR for the book and possibly has copyvio problems. He popped up in the news this past week because his stolen championship belts were found (in a vehicle in a junkyard about to be crushed!), repaired and returned to him. Editing to add the larger story might be right up your alley. Montanabw^(talk) 16:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:RFKennedy JFKennedy KMundt May1957.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Also:

• File:EnemyWithin covera.jpg

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rifthp.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Earl Old Person. It’s not in real great shape. I added a source and a wee bit more info and will also add a photo that I think you will like. But I don’t have the time to really do much right now…Montanabw^(talk) 00:29, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dance of the Dwarfs, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dance of the Dwarfs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant Employees has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Anarchyte (talk) 09:21, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The last time I saw The D and Four Queens was a crazy night at the Crew circa 2011. APK whisper in my ear 04:01, 17 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Remind me who D is again? Donkey D**k Dan from Secrets? Cool Disco Dan? :) - Tim1965 (talk) 21:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of the above. APK whisper in my ear 05:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• THANK YOU! Can't believe it's been that long! - Tim1965 (talk) 21:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all you’ve done to compile and write so much labor history on this site. Your contributions are invaluable!! 71.105.165.231 (talk) 22:03, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the undo there. I meant to revert two edits. You're doing good work with the cites but the event added by the IP isn't notable enough. There's an article about the cartoon network but not about its launch. Toddst1 (talk) 00:19, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I had no skin in the game here. LOL I just happened to know where to find a cite for that factoid. - Tim1965 (talk) 23:23, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Back in 2015, you added a cite to this article here. I have tried to find an online source, but the Post doesn't seem to have an easily accessible archive (like in Newspapers.com or the like). The cite appears in your edits as :

<ref name=cheshire>{{cite news|last=Cheshire|first=Maine|title=This House of History Is Also a House of Mystery|work=The Washington Post|date=September 10, 1962|page=B3}}</ref>}}

I am pretty certain that the writer is supposed to be the reporter Maxine Cheshire but I am unable to verify that due to the difficulty I am having accessing any past Post editions. Do you have access to any Post archives? If so, would is be possible for you to post the text of the article on my page, or maybe the URL or perhaps email me a copy of the article? In any case, if you could verify my unconfirmed suspicion that the name is incorrect and then adjust the spelling that would be very helpful. Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 19:38, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• I fixed it! You were totally right: It was Maxine, not Maine. - Tim1965 (talk) 22:26, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bctd logo2.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on Butterfield; ripples in the news this week, better than a barnstar.[2] – SJ + 03:25, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Wow! Had no idea! and thanks! - Tim1965 (talk) 04:06, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2023 WikiProject Organized Labour/Online Edit-A-Thon
	Hello, Tim1965! During the entire month of February there will be an ongoing edit-a-thon on all labour related projects across English Wikipedia and sister projects. Register to track your edits and sign up on the edit-a-thon's project page as a participant. To invite other participants paste {{subst:WPLABOR/2023}} on their talk page! This event is organized by WP:WikiProject Organized Labour

Myotus (talk) 15:37, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:53, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If there is a problem with reliable sources conflicting over Scott Glenn's year of birth, Wikipedia guidelines say to add both dates (with reliable sources) and note in the text or a footnote that sources differ. The solution is not to keep a year of birth off the page. Especially when there are reliable sources that document year(s) of birth. - Tim1965 (talk) 14:03, 27 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia users in the United States Mountain West and High Plains will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, articles, or photographs of our region is encouraged to attend.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Burials at Graceland Cemetery (Washington, D.C.) has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 03:22, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Cemeteries in Appomattox County, Virginia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nysut.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Yeeno (talk) 02:17, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 9, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the history, geography, articles, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In this edit to John F. Kennedy Eternal Flame you introduced {{sfn|Atkinson|2007|page=27}} without defining it. There were already (and still are) two potential "Atkinson 2007" works listed - Where Valor Rests: Arlington National Cemetery and an article published in National Geographic. As a result the article is in Category:Harv and Sfn no-target errors. If you could fix it that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 11:05, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Done! - Tim1965 (talk) 18:36, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. DuncanHill (talk) 19:00, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 8, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in articles, history, geography, maps, or photographs of the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. We may try to organize one or more Wiknics. Guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from the Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cemeteries in Charlottesville, Virginia has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:47, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:36, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

...after I went up the escalator and this was the first thing I saw. Yes, I took selfies in front of it. APK whisper in my ear 12:53, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Oh come on. Like you never visited a Jay Jacobs during its androgynous heyday! LOL - Tim1965 (talk) 13:35, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 14, 2023, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

-MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1841 establishments in Montana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:27, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1841 in Montana indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. –Aidan721 (talk) 19:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, February 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:50, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks logo - 2007.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:02, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West will hold an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 14, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. All guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The online meeting of the Wikimedians of the U.S. Mountain West originally scheduled for May 14 has been rescheduled for 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, May 21, 2024, at meet.google.com/wbg-wgws-sbj. Please see our new meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks. - MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

The Wikipedia users of Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming are invited to an online meeting from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MDT, Tuesday evening, August 13, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. Anyone interested in the Mountain West or the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. There is no obligation to participate and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our Wikipedia:Meetup/US Mountain West/Invitation list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Reel Affirmations has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 21:10, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia US Mountain West

We will host an online meet for Wikipedia users from 8:00 to 9:00 PM MST, Tuesday evening, November 12, 2024, at meet.google.com/kfu-topq-zkd. We will have reports from WikiConference North America 2024. We hope to organize a North American Hub to support local activities. Anyone interested in the future direction of Wikipedia and the Wikimedia movement is encouraged to attend. Help is available for new users, and all guests are welcome. Please see our meeting page for details.

If you don't wish to receive these invitations any more, please remove your username from our invitaion list. Thanks.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]