User talk:Robertg9

This is Robertg9's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Welcome!

Hello, Robertg9, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Gamaliel 16:42, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I have deleted Racqueltorres, which I assume you have created by mistake. Consider that you cannot enter copyrighted text in Wikipedia. If the text of this article was not under copyright and you want to recreate an article with a correct title, I can post the previous content of the article here. - Liberatore(T) 15:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi Paolo...yes...the previous content needs to be posted under the title George Washington Bradley under category 19th century baseball players It is taken from a 1931 newspaper article which I have cited.

Aw, I missed the date of 1931... Here is the text of the article:

George Washington Bradley (Grin) (1852-1931} batted righthanded and threw righthanded. He was 5'10.5" and 175 lbs. George Bradley was the first man to pitch an official no-hit, no-run game in major league baseball. He pitched for St. Louis in the club's victory over Hartford on July 13, 1876. The score ended 2-0 without a hit being allowed. Bradley was involved in professional baseball for thirty years, nineteen of them with the Philadelphia Athletics. He helped the A's win the championship of 1883. He became a Philadelphia policeman following baseball. At the time of his death George was retired on a pension from the police department which he had received beginning in September 1931. He died at his home, 2524 W. Hagert Street, Philadelphia, on Friday night, October 2, 1931. Funeral Services were conducted at the Stringfield Bldg., 1937 N. Broad St., Philadelphia, and he was buried in Northwood Cemtery. Bradley was married to Charlotte H. Bradley (nee Hevener). The former policeman and baseball pitcher was a member of F. and A.M., Lodge No. 9, Lambskin Club, Police Ben. Assoc., and the Veterans Athletic Asso. Sources: Philadelphia Public Ledger, Sunday Morning, Oct. 4, 1931, P. 6 and The 1996 MacMillan Baseball Encyclopedia Digital Edition.

For reasons that are too boring to be explained in details, I am not creating the article myself. You can click "edit" to cut this text for pasting in George Washington Bradley. Thanks. - Liberatore(T) 16:39, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi Paolo,

I have contributed a page for Karl Tutwiler Adams under 19th century baseball players in error. I requested that the page be moved to Major League Baseball pitchers. Now the title of the article seems to be Major League Baseball pitchers rather than Karl Tutwiler Adams. Can you assist me or will this be change later? Best from Robertg9 Robert Reynolds Jr.

Ok, done. When you want to change the category of an article, just edit the article and change the part [[Category:Whatever]]. Beside, you stated that the source of this article is a newspaper from 1967. As such, I think that it cannot be reproduced here. I suggest to rewrite this article from scratch. Contact me when you are done, so that I can delete the version that contained copyrighted text. Sorry for insisting on copyright issues, but a copyright violation is a risk for the project (see Wikipedia:Copyright_FAQ for more details). - Liberatore(T) 19:13, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi Paolo,

I listed the source as a 1967 newspapers. As with all the writing which I submit, I have written with my own wording and different from the way it was printed first. Many thanks for your change in the category for me. Best Robertg9 Robert

Also Paolo, the Jack Boyle entry is showing up under J under 19th century baseball players rather than B alphabetically...And my entry for George Washington Bradley is not appearing yet under 19th century baseball players. Finally the Karl Tutwiler Adams has yet to appear under Major League Pitchers alphabetically. Many thanks Robertg9...

The 1967 article is in my own words and different from the newspaper article...I always rephrase my submissions and cite the source or sources...

I think that the solution for alphabetizing correctly is [[Category:19th century baseball players|Boyle, Jack]] and similar for the other ones. However, rather than worring about categories, what these articles are still missing is some formatting: see the other articles in these categories for example. More details are in How to edit a page.

Two other things: do not start a line with a space, as that causes an incorrect formatting. Second, end your posts on talk pages with 4 tildes like this: ~~~~; do that only on talk pages (discussion) and not on articles. Thank you. - Liberatore(T) 20:26, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paolo,

---

I prefer to keep the format of a 19th and early 20th century obit rather than a standard formula. I think it reads much better than merely statistics...--Robertg9 21:30, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Paolo, My page on Karl Tutwiler Adams does not appear under major league pitchers. It appears be ok and has been formatted by Wikipedia...Would you put it in the correct place under major league pitchers? Also I have cleaned up the article on Martin F. Hogan which was tagged for cleanup, will you add it to the 19th century players now? Many thanks, Sincerely, Robert --Robertg9 16:36, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with Adams was capitalization: you used "Major League pitchers" but the category was named "Major league pitcher". The Hogan article was already in the correct category and in the correct position. - Liberatore(T) 17:16, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paolo, Many thanks for your corrections. Will you also add the article on Gus Alberts to the 19th century baseball players. I don't think I have made mistakes in my submission, but please check. Best from Robert --Robertg9 18:11, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi Paolo, I am beginning a project for my job at Duke University and I need your assistance. I am going to be contributing quite a bit on the subject of visual perception and need your ideas on where to begin placing the material. It deals with the philosopher George Berkeley, visual perception, etc. It is from the website of Dr. Dale Purves here at Duke Med. Ctr. He wants me to add his data along with pertinent figures....Should I begin under George Berkeley or start with the broader subject of visual perception? Also, about editing, where is a good place to begin? Best from Robert--Robertg9 14:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Robert G. Reynolds Jr. 3/22/06[reply]

See Talk:Craik-O'Brien-Cornsweet illusion. This material can be in the article only if it has previously published elsewhere and is referenced by a source citation. Also, Wikipedia articles do not have authors and are not signed. Dpbsmith (talk) 16:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Hi I am working for Dr. Dale Purves in the Department of Cognitive Science at Duke University Medical Center. He has instructed me to add this information and more from his website. Can you please restore it as it has taken some time for me to type this? I was completing the text prior to typing the references. This is a major project for him and he has instructed me to add what he wants to Wikipedia according to topics of his choosing. I sign the articles after I have finished in order for people to recognize the changes I have made. I have earlier contributed articles for Dr. Purves relating to visual perception and Chubb illusion. Sincerely, Robert. I have requested that the boldface type on the Chubb illusion information but it has not yet been added. --Robert 16:25, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll do it, but for future reference you can do it yourself by going into the History section, clicking on the previous version, then clicking on "Edit This Page" which starts from the previous version. I'm taking you at your word that you'll add the references. Do not sign material that you put into articles. Changes are tracked via the History (and Differences) features.

To avoid problems with half-completed material, you can compose material on your own User page and then paste it into an article when you've completed it. Dpbsmith (talk) 17:17, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, could you provide the 'headline' and 'italics' as they should read now that I have completed the article about "Craik-O'Brien Cornsweet"? Also the boldface format which I have requested for my contributions on the Chub illusion? --Robert 18:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that's so easy I really think you should do that yourself. To make an item italic, enclose it in a pair of single quotes when editing in the edit box.

''this'' in the edit box becomes this when the article is displayed.

To make it bold, enclose it in THREE single quotes:

'''this''' in the edit box becomes this when the article is displayed.

Hi Robert,

I note from your edits on "depth perception" that you seem to have the habit of randomly wiki-linking words within your text. For example, in a single paragraph, you linked words like "clearly" "puzzles" "first" "room" "second" "tendency", etc. While it's good to link to other articles, it's bad to place links that a) don't go anywhere, like "empirically", and b) have no relevance to the article and are not obvious points of interest. That is, you should link to things that are likely to be unfamiliar terms to people that they would want to read about. People aren't likely to want to read an article on the word "clearly" (whatever that might be) while they're reading about depth perception, and it makes the text distracting. It also takes database queries to produce wikilinks, so every spurious link is a needless burden on the site. Your writing is good, but you might want to reconsider that particular habit. Graft 13:38, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah - also, you appear to have included someone else's text into the page. Wikipedia articles should include ONLY absolutely original text, unless it is part of a quote. Graft 13:43, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your comments...I will be less frequent with my links...However I do not understand which text you are talking about me having linked another person's text? The depth perception article I am adding for a professor I am working for at Duke...the link to his website is by his own instruction to me...., i.e. Dale Purves' Lab...www.purveslab.net/ He wants people to see this

Thanks again, Robert --Robert 17:04, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You included some text that is taken straight from the Purves lab's web page. Perhaps Dale is willing to release copyright on it, but anyway it's probably not appropriate to quote it directly - it doesn't flow well with the text and its level of detail is inconsistent with the rest of the article. Also, while Purves' work is interesting, it's not really appropriate to use Wikipedia as a place to publicize the work... Graft 16:11, 12 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

--152.16.224.169 19:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Robert 16:17, 15 May 2006 (UTC)Hello Graft,[reply]

Dr. Purves tells me that he wants to make a contribution to Wikipedia. He does not intend to try and "publicize" his work but to make some helpful additions on topics related to visual perception. He is revising his insertions to make them original for Wikipedia and I hope this will work out.

Sincerely, Robert--152.16.224.169 19:38, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

i've proposed William Kennon Mayo for deletion as non-notable. if you oppoose this proposal (as i suspect you might), please head over to the deletion discussion page and make your case. thanks! frymaster 17:25, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe Mayo's career is noteworthy...He became a Commodore, held the post of Commander of Norfolk Navy Yard, participated in two major wars, and was cited by the Secretary of the Navy. This is as much as I can say to defend this person's inclusion. Also his career is interesting, especially his service in the Civil War where he captained several vessels.

Best from Robert--Robert 17:47, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

I think Commodore Mayo is safe from deletion. It was Afd'd just as you began to write it - but now it seems a nice bio of a fairly distinguished seaman. I just gave it a quick copy edit. Cheers, Grusl 18:45, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for your note, Sincerely, Robert--Robert 19:41, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

all has been noted and i've changed my opinion to "keep" on the afd page. if possible in the future could you not save draft copies but, rather, compose a more complete version offline and save all at once? the rc-patrollers will thank you for it! frymaster 19:55, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chubb illusion that you wrote appears to take information from what seems to be a copyrighted source: purveslab. What's up with that?--Commander Keane 10:14, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am contributing information for Dale Purves, the Director of Cognitive Neuroscience at Duke Medical Center. --Robert 16:03, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Robertg9

Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia! Your additions to the Shauna Grant article were brought to my attention, and I wanted to ask you about them. For one, from what source or sources did you get your information for the article? Also, there is a question about the tone of the article, which is written more like an biography rather than a proper encyclopedia article. Perhaps you can revise the article so as to include verifiable sources as references, and follow the manual of style regarding the tone of the article? Of course, if you have any questions, please feel free to ask away! Thank you! -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO?} 23:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe,

The article is very much taken from a valid source. It is from the work of LA Times columnist Michael London. I will be adding additional sources. I think it is debatable as to what defines a "proper" encyclopedia article. The writing Mr. London did and another source I am using are both interviews and oral histories, therefore the biographical tone. London was perhaps the only person privy to the Applegate family after her tragic death because they are Catholic and wanted to convince the reporter their daughter did not commit suicide. The article which was on your site is very vague and her bio needed more details. It's an event I remember and have been curious about for some time. I know the star Tiffany Mynx and former star Angela Summers through correspondence.--Robert 04:57, 10 June 2006 (UTC)Robertg9[reply]

Joe,

Check the Shauna article again for listing of sources, of which I added 4 or 5 on the weekend.

Many thanks for your contributions to biographical articles on Wikipedia. Unfortunately, quite a few of your articles have been deleted or listed for deletion. This isn't because they are bad, or because we hate you (we certainly don't!), but because they relate to people who probably shouldn't have encyclopedia articles written about them. Please don't take offence, but consider reading our guidelines for inclusion of biographical articles before adding any more. Thanks again! Stifle (talk) 00:25, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is really strange and pathetic. I have a number of parties at Duke where I work who enjoy reading these bios of Mexican War veterans. Is it fair to delete them just because some so called authority "caves in" and merely wants to remove them? Likewise there are many articles I read which are so poorly written and researched, and which you let stand up. Is there really an "objective criterion" for inclusion on Wikipedia? I hardly believe it anymore. And there are others who are seconding this notion. Why have an internet resource if one cannot be creative when writing and contributing? We can all just read Britannica. I mean it's a free resource at Duke and other universities. This random policing by so-called authorities is counterproductive in oh so many ways to your website!--Robert 20:55, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:BIO for our inclusion policies for people. Those nominating articles for deletion are not "so-called authorities"... They are editors like you and me, although they're usually pretty familiar with our policies. Grandmasterka 08:51, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Can you tell me the reason my contribution to "Baracuda" has been deleted or "vandalized"? I made a substantial entry to this article during May and over the weekend noticed that all but the sources have been deleted. The most glaring deletion had to do with the attacks on humans by baracuda dating back to the 17th century. You will notice the classical sources, some of which are entered in a foreign language, French, etc. Please let me know...if it was an editorial deletion I did not hear from you.--Robert 13:22, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your comments on my talk page:

This is in relation to articles related to visual perception which have been removed by you due to copyright issues. Mach Bands is a particular one in which information contributed by Dale Purves at Neuroscience, Duke Medical Center, was removed. I am his assistant who has been inserting the articles. We have removed any contributions which would link to or in any manner infringe on copyright issues. I request that we be able to re-enter his ideas with improvements made specifically for Wikipedia, which in no way will be a mirror of any other figures. We have removed figures for Mach bands, Chubb illusion, etc. Please let us know if this is ok because we would like to continue our work.

You do not need to ask my permission to edit Wikipedia articles, however, your previous contributions have been merely to cut-and-paste text from http://www.purveslab.net/ . Depending on who holds the copyright and granted permission for that text to be used here, it may or may not have violated Wiki policy regarding copyrights. Other relevant policies and guidelines can be found in Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (e.g. Wiki is not a mirror) and Wikipedia:Autobiography (e.g. "You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest."). Also, if you have been instructed to "re-enter (Dr. Purves') ideas", please be sure this does violate Wikipedia:No original research. -Medtopic 17:05, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ditto for Simultaneous brightness contrast, which was clearly copied. -Will Beback 22:19, 24 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Despite previous warnings, it appears that you again inserted cut-and-paste material into Color vision, Cornsweet illusion, Chubb illusion, and Mach bands‎. Please familiarize yourself with Wikipedia policies and guidelines outlined above. -AED 00:00, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BarbaraParkins.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:04, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:KarenMorley.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:05, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:KarenMorley1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:06, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:KarenMorley1.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:06, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:KayFrancis1.jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

On 10 August, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Alberta Vaughn, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for uploading Image:GloriaSwanson2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:HelenVinson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robertg9. Could you please tell me the exact name of the deleted article? --Fang Aili ^talk 13:43, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Simultaneous brightness contrast

Robert--Robert 13:46, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article was a pretty clear copy of this, and even if you did get permission from Dale Perves, a number of other problems arise:

1. Dale Perves would have to release the information under a GDFL or Creative Commons license, and
2. Wikipedia has a policy of No original research.

Therefore inclusion of this article is not appropriate. I appreciate your enthusiasm, though. I would bet there are other wiki sites that would accept original research such as this. Cheers, Fang Aili ^talk 14:49, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:KayFrancis2.jpg.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 16:33, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fritz,

Kay Francis2.jpg.JPG is being used in the article about the 1930s actress, a previous image, Kay Francis.1.jpg.JPG is not and is o.k. to be removed. The image which is in the article about her, JPG2, is a nice one and does qualify as fair use...--Robert 16:50, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey nice to see someone creating the same sort of articles (and writing decently) that I am doing. My entry William Garwood was on the main page yesterday!! I am also starting entries on all the cool old silent films. Interested in helping out. Currently working on Charlotte Burton's films.Ernst Stavro Blofeld 20:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Robert, I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again, and happy editing! mattbr³⁰ 22:59, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CarmelMyersbw.jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:CaroleLombard3.jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:Barbaraparkins1 1.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Peter O. (Talk) 19:03, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:BarbaraParkins1 1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:06, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi,

You did a great job starting out the article on Jack Boyle. I recently went through and added as many references as possible to the facts in the article, but there were still many I could not find sources for. If possible, would you be able to add in the in line citations to the sources you used in creating the article? I'd like to get the information confirmed, or if its not possible for it to be confirmed, it should be removed. If it's a web site, you can just send me the link and I'll reference whatever's there. Thanks, Mattingly23 21:36, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

The article is from the Cincinnati newspaper, the Inquirer, from a day or so after Boyle's death. I am not sure I can put my hand on it just now, as it was mailed to me by a librarian and I have misplaced it. So am not sure of the page number. I will look today to see if I can find an alternate source in another database. Best from Robert--Robert 12:21, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Ann Harding.jpg.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Fritz S. (Talk) 14:46, 26 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:DorisKenyon1.jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 02:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:GretaNissen,jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 03:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:GretaNissen1.jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading Image:AnitaPage.jpg.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Bleh, more bad news. Lars Larsen has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt this person might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:Notability (people) for the relevant guidelines. If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" template, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod template, the article will not be deleted, but if an editor is still not satisfied that it meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. NickelShoe (Talk) 17:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Evelyn Hoey, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Yomangani^talk 01:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Torontogirl.jpg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Vintagenude.jpg.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:06, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:DorisKenyon.jpg.JPG. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 00:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert,

I thought I'd drop by a leave you a message regarding some of the images that you have uploaded. Firstly, all fair use images must have a fair use rationale. Any fair use image that doesn't have a rationale explaining why it may be used on Wikipedia is subject to deletion. Please take a look through your contributions and add a rationale to any image that needs one. Second, please note that fair use images may only be used in limited circumstances. One of these limitations is that only the bare minimum of fair use images may be used on an article. So two fair use images showing an image of a person on the same article isn't allowed. Thirdly, please also be aware that fair use images are only allowed to be used for articles. Any fair use images on userpages, talk pages, etc must be removed. Image:CaroleLombard3.jpg falls under this and needs to be removed from your userpage as soon as possible.

I know this sounds like a lot of work to fix, and it is, but it is an essential part in making Wikipedia a free encyclopedia. If you need any help, feel free to drop me a message on my talk page. Thanks and have a good new year. --PS2pcGAMER (talk) 10:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:GretaNissen1.jpg.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 07:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I work at the Bryn Mawr College Alumnae Association. I was recently reading your article on Elaine Hammerstein and noticed that she graduated from Bryn Mawr. After perusing our alumnae database, old year books, and colleagues' memories, I was able to find no record of Elaine ever attending Bryn Mawr College. Could you please tell me where you found the information that she attended Bryn Mawr? 165.106.153.178 16:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Yes the information is in the Sunday edition of the Indianapolis Star, September 10, 1922, Page 77. The sentence says that she graduated from Bryn Mawr in 1913 at the age of 17! Perhaps I can send you a PDF if you desire.

Best, Robert--Robert 17:31, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you could send me the pdf. Thanks! 165.106.153.178 18:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that you did a lot of work on this article, and that someone recently deleted a lot of info. Take a look if you have time, and see what you think. Best regards, -- Ssilvers 19:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I believe that I noticed the new deletions a while ago but have not gotten back to it. It's really ashame when references are removed, as I always include them when I add articles. Stay in touch, Sincerely --Robert 20:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I stumbled over some of your articles and enjoyed reading them. I have a few suggestions: use "–" (i.e. –) instead of hyphens when giving ranges of dates (you will find this and other information in Wikipedia:Manual of Style (biographies)). Newspaper names should be in italics, and article names enclosed in quotation marks (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (titles)). You can check out Lillian Sinnott (or look at featured biographical articles, where you can also learn how to use footnotes rather than a plain list for references). Rl 09:39, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, while working on the Neilson disambiguation page I realised that there were two articles about the same actress—the other (older and longer) one to be found at Adelaide Neilson. I have turned the page you created into a redirect and copied the article onto Talk:Adelaide Neilson. From there, it should be possible to incorporate those bits of information from your article which the other one may be lacking.

All the best, <KF> 20:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Robert ... Sorry if my evil twin was a little abrupt or rude concerning the edit conflicts on this article, but that comes from sitting at the keyboard for Too Long in one session. :-)

Speaking of Too Long, you might want to look into archiving some of the comments on this page ... I took the liberty of adding a {{talkheader}} (and some cleanups of the earliest posts to improve readability) to make it easier to add new topics with the special link it provides.

Have a better one! —72.75.73.158 13:02, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Fig1PurvesVisual.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 22:02, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Fig2PurvesVisualPerception.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 22:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you uploaded Image:Fig3PrimerPurvesVisual.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 22:03, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you uploaded Image:PrimerFig4PurvesVisualPerception.jpg, you did not specify complete source and copyright information. Another user subsequently tagged it with {{GFDL-presumed}} and, for some time, it has existed on Wikipedia under the assumption that you created the image and you agreed to license it under the GFDL. This assumption, however well-meaning, is not legally sufficient and the tag is being phased out. Images using it are being deleted.

This image has been tagged for deletion and will be deleted in one week if adequate copyright information is not provided.

If you, personally, are the author of this content, meaning that you took the photograph yourself or you created the chart yourself (and it does not use any clipart that you did not create), please retag the image with a free image copyright tag that correctly describes your licensing intentions, usually {{GFDL-self}} or {{PD-self}}. Please also make sure if you have not already done so that you write a good description of what the image depicts, when you took the photo, and other important details. This will allow Wikipedia to continue using the image.

If you did not create the image or if it is derived from the copyrighted works of others, please keep in mind that most images on the internet are copyrighted and are not suitable for use on Wikipedia. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others and does not use images unless we know that they have been freely licensed. Any creative work is automatically copyrighted, even if it lacks a copyright notice. Unless the copyright holder has specifically disclaimed their rights to the image and released it under the GFDL or another compatible license, we cannot use it. If you did not create the image, and cannot make the image compliant with Wikipedia:Non-free content, simply do nothing and it will be deleted in a week. All other non-free images must follow these rules.

Please feel free to contact me on my talk page or leave a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions with any questions you may have. Thank you. Aksibot 07:24, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on De Sacia Mooers, by Flyne, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because De Sacia Mooers seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting De Sacia Mooers, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate De Sacia Mooers itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 05:32, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

De Sacia Mooers is mentioned on p226-227, 241 of "The Curse of Beauty: The Scandalous and Tragic Life of Audrey Munson, America's First Supermodel" (ReganArts 2016)

Please cite your source that MacMillan appeared in a stage version of The Patchwork Girl of Oz. She was in the film, but Baum's stage version was never produced according to Michael Patrick Hearn, an acknowledged expert on all things Baum. --Scottandrewhutchins 17:35, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robertg9. You recently added "Lauda, Driving a McClaren, Captures Long Beach Grand Prix, New York Times, April 5, 1982, Page C2." as a reference for Andrea de Cesaris. I just wanted to check how the referenced article spells "McLaren" - do they spell it correctly (i.e. "McLaren") or as you have written it ("McClaren")? If it's "McClaren" then we probably need to note that in the article, or else people will "correct" it. -- DH85868993 03:45, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, it was merely a mistake on my part as I checked and they do spell it McLaren, I will return and change it, Sincerely, Robert

Another tip for when adding references. The idea of giving a reference a name is so that you can reuse the reference within the same article without having to specify the reference in full again - have a look at the changes I made to Harry Schell to see what I mean. Keep up the good work! -- DH85868993 03:31, 12 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am adding some to the Jean Behra article. I wanted you to know that the June 2, 1957 NYT article spells his name Behre. Also, thanks for the tip on the footnotes, multiple usage, Sincerely, Robert

Hi, I was editing John Behra and Wikipedia had server difficulties. When I saved the information the bottom portion with the Grand Prix summary and categories had been deleted. Can you fix this? I am sorry if I did something to cause this. Best from Robert

Hi Robert. I've fixed it. When you referenced the "death" reference the second time, you forgot the slash, i.e. you wrote "<ref name=death>" instead of "<ref name=death/>". Easy mistake to make. Regards. DH85868993 04:03, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert. I've noticed that you've added the "<nationality> people" category to some of the F1 driver articles you have updated (for example, you added Category:American people to Richie Ginther). As a general rule, if an article is already in the "<nationality> racecar drivers" or "<nationality> Formula One drivers" category, we don't add the "<nationality> people" category unless the driver is also notable for something other than being a racing driver. On that basis, are you happy for me to remove Category:American people from Richie Ginther? DH85868993 _people" class="ext-discussiontools-init-timestamplink">12:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, I'll remove the category from Ginther and others. I agree with you about Schell and de Portago - I'll leave those two. DH85868993 13:00, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Has that fixed it? DH85868993 07:19, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, has fixed aside from not showing Hesketh 1976 in categories.--Robert 08:27, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert. I'm not sure I understand what you mean by that. The only categories I can see listed in the article are Category:1945 births, Category:Living people, Category:American racecar drivers and Category:American Formula One drivers. Were you expecting there to be another one? DH85868993 10:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi DH,

Sorry I meant the headings in the sections of the article, which now have been fixed o.k. The Hesketh section was missing for some time.

Best from Robert--Robert 02:24, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Fred Cummings (veteran), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Giggy _U^CP 00:08, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:LouiseFazenda2.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 02:00, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You seem to have provided most of the text of the Helen Gilmore article. It looks like there may be some confusion between two different actresses named Helen Gilmore, apparently also sharing an IMDB entry; see Talk:Helen Gilmore. If you happen to still have access to the original sources cited in the article, could you please double-check that the Helen Gilmore born in 1900 could have plausibly been playing a Head Nurse in Too Much Business (1922) or Mrs. Hobbs in A Petticoat Pilot (1918)? Thanks, Hqb 19:42, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh great, from the PDF you posted below, it seems we may have a third Helen Gilmore. She, too, seems too young to play some of the roles attributed to her in the IMDB. This is starting to look pretty hopeless. Hqb 07:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I have enabled 'Email this user' in my profile, if you want to send me anything, like you offered. But if it's inconclusive, please don't worry about it. I have no particular interest in Ms. Gilmore; I just happened across the article at random. Maybe we should just tag it as needing verification. Hqb 07:52, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Helengilmore.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Erv Brame, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Erv Brame satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erv Brame and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Erv Brame during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eggy49er 19:29, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eddie Bockman, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Eddie Bockman satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eddie Bockman and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Eddie Bockman during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Eggy49er 19:45, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Helengilmore.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:36, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gillis MacGill, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gillis MacGill seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gillis MacGill, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 16:31, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:GloriaSwanson2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CarmelMyersbw.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 21:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:CarmelMyersbw.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
2. On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 21:01, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• ...that Ethel Jackson, the comic prima donna, married a lawyer in 1908, who she met whilst he assisted her with her divorce? by User:Robertg9

OK? Victuallers 21:50, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks for the nomination, they did meet during divorce proceedings.

Sincerely, Robert--Robert 23:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 11 November, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ethel Jackson, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—Wknight94 (talk) 16:56, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Amelia Bingham requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Helpful One ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 19:25, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You added some text to the article on Barbara Lang as follows: Lang was the daughter of silent film dancer, Maureen Knight, and a deceased Los Angeles, California nose drop bottler, Stannage Bly.

I am curious as to what is a "nose drop bottler"? Stellar (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 11:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am unfamiliar with the term, but obviously he must have been involved in putting nose drops in a bottle. It has been awhile since I made that edit and it was before I began to reference with footnotes. So I am unsure which source mentioned it. Thanks for your query. --Robert (talk) 12:16, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:HelenVinson.jpg.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:28, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm part of WikiProject Fashion. I saw the page you created about Maud Molko. I was wondering, what made you choose to create a page about that person? Is there a particular reason? For all I know she worked a little back in 2004 but since then she didn't do much? Thanks for your time anyways. Thiste (talk) 18:52, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have a modelling blog at http://www.fashionmodelgossip.blogspot.com I was looking at some modelling pages and came across her photos. I saw that she has acting aspirations also. Yes, I think it was "Hint" where I found her images first. Unsure what my reason for selecting is, aside from her very natural appearance. Do you have anything on Carolin Hoppe, the German model? I found her at the FashionModelDirectory, ModelWerk, and Take 2.

I can't seem to find a date of birth, place of birth, or even a brief profile. I wrote a brief entry on her this morning. Her pics in Maxi look awesome, I wish I could obtain a few images I could save to my desktop. Thanks for writing, Best from Robert--Robert (talk) 19:03, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you are referring to this page, maybe you could have seen that it was dated august 2004, and she hasn't done much since then (read, nothing). While she has worked for Marc Jacobs and has an FMD page, that doesn't secure her the notability to create a wikipedia article about her. Again, not working on anything significant for four years is a good indicator of non-notability, let alone the infamous google test that reaches a mere 416 hits, which is clearly too low to be considered notable. I've seen pages with as much as 6000 hits get filed for deletion.

If I had an advice for you, it would be to check twice (or ten times) before creating an article. Not every model out there deserves one. You should make sure the person has a significant career both in proeminance of work and in durability. For this, I advise you to read WP:BIO to learn a bit about notability of people.

In consequence of all this, I have to tell you this article will be filed for deletion. And probably any other model article you might have created that might not be considered notable enough. You will be able to make a case for the article of course since this process takes one week to complete.

I'm sorry for this as I'm sure you didn't mean to do bad but this is an encyclopedia, not a database of all things and/or people in the world. Thiste (talk) 17:40, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Maud Molko, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maud Molko and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated Carolin Hoppe, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolin Hoppe and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 19:00, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Toni Garrin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Accounting4Taste:talk 15:18, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! In one part of your John Vallely article, you wrote, "As a 6'2" forward for Orange Coast College, Vallely averaged points per game and was selected a junior college All American." It looks like you left out the number of points he averaged. Just wanted to let you know. Zagalejo^^^ 17:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi , Thanks for creating an entry on the beautiful Lotta Faust. Im sure you agree with me she died way to soon at the age of 29. You seem to have an interest in stage actresses from the turn of the century. The ones that are not as well known. Maybe you'll stumble across Mabel Barrison(1886-1912) or Marie Booth Russell(d. 1911). Take care. Keep those posts coming. One thing, are you sure Gail Kane was born in 1892? Some older sources have her born in 1887.Koplimek (talk) 20:30, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article 2008 in Algeria, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Mark (Mschel) 04:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Annharding.jpg.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 04:52, 21 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I know Asia from my schoolyears and I'm really shocked&suprised to find her name on Wikipedia. I didn't know that she became so successful! In the article about Asia, you mentioned her real name but it has a wrong spelling. In discussion I've typed the proper version of it. 193.151.115.9 (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the post and the information. I do a fair amount of work on fashion models, I also blog and may have mentioned Asia in my blog, http://www.fashionmodelgossip.blogspot.com I will leave the name and hair color as my reference gave it, but any reader can note your correction in the talk area. I do not know Asia and am pleased to find someone who knows more about her. Sometimes the bios run by modelling agencies are incorrect on names, hair color, etc., which I discover quite frequently.--Robert (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The entry on Joan Lowell is incorrect. It takes as face value her book "Cradle of the Deep," which was exposed as mostly fiction. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.197.36.19 (talk) 15:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unfamiliar with the "Armed Expeditionary Forces" in which her father served; I assumed it should be the American Expeditionary Force and have made the change. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:32, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it's likely you are correct, she was born in San Antonio where her father was stationed. --Robert (talk) 14:16, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Kryptonite Nixon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 17:28, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Kryptonite Nixon, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kryptonite Nixon. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ukexpat (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about not putting a note of explanation on your talk page about the deletion; I've noted my reasons here. MisfitToys (talk) 22:39, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Hendrik Hudson Hotel, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hendrik Hudson Hotel. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? KV5 • Squawk box • Fight on! 17:27, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, just noticed you seem to be marking all your edits (including page creation) as minor edits, when a lot of them shouldn't be, please see Help:Minor edit. Have you got 'Mark all edits minor by default' ticked in the editing section of your preferences? -Hunting dog (talk) 11:32, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it was an oversight.--Robert (talk) 15:39, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Parker Building, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Largo Plazo (talk) 17:01, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Detmer Woolen Company, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 13:15, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A page you created, Richlieu Inc., has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. ukexpat (talk) 16:56, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Holober Brothers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you.  Ravenswing  20:37, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on John Power (restaurant owner) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. KurtRaschke (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Abraham Dorb requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. feydey (talk) 18:34, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Marla Boehr, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no significant assertion of notability, no independent sourcing, spammy tone

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 23:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rome Company, Inc., suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

No indication that the subject meets the notability guidelines.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. §FreeRangeFrog 21:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Due to your interest I suggest a research of Betty Morrissey an actress scarcely mentioned in the web. She worked with Charlie Chaplin (in The gold rush, The circus, A woman in Paris)and in other films, apparently died at 36 in 1944 and is impossible to find a single image of her and more of her life. Have you got more informations and photos? (or know where to look at...) Best Regards Raffaele Fragapane (Italy) - panexpo@tiscali.it - 80.104.45.198 (talk) 14:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Raphael,

Thanks for your note and I will check into this in some databases I use.

Best, Robert

P.S. Tell me more about you.--Robert (talk) 15:57, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Meghan Posusney, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Meghan Posusney satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Meghan Posusney and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Meghan Posusney during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rcawsey (talk) 16:16, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Agmel, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Hoax

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 17:33, 7 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Margy Hart has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a living person (well, we don't know) but being known for this one event isn't that notable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ricky81682 (talk) 04:25, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You will have to do more work on stubs such as Klareco Textile and Titanine, Incorporated. Why are they notable? What contribution did either of them make to New York City cultural history? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 17:51, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Klareco Textile was a part of the Silk Centre, which I have created an article about earlier. I linked the article. Titanine, Inc., I am currently looking for more info. on. The addresses which these businesses occupied make them noteworthy, period. This is Manhattan and its history is very significant to Wiki users, geneaologists, urban historians, etc. Being away from NYC is somewhat of a disadvantage, although the NY Times and WSJ databases here at Duke are very helpful. Some of what I am looking for is not available on the internet, but most likely at the NYPL. I'll keep trying.Robert (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Klareco was copied to User:Robertg9/Klareco_Textile for you to work on. -- Alexf^(talk) 10:31, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously claiming that just because the company had an address on Madison Avenue, it is automatically notable? Would it be OK for me to create articles for every company that has ever traded on Oxford Street? For Titanine, you gave no address so even that argument does not apply. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 14:06, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So we have a difference of opinion, but I maintain my argument that it is noteworthy, to some extent, because of being in Manhattan. Not only because it is more likely to be added to by different authors, but also because more people will want to know about it. People worked there, they did financial transactions, and it is also important historically, in being a defunct financial business, which could not make it during the Great Depression.Robert (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ana Colja, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Colja. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 00:52, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Diamond James, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diamond James. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:30, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert. Unless you are well into your nineties and have a miraculously good memory, I guess you've got some other sources of information about businesses like Loft, Inc. Please can you add them to the article? References would useful even if they aren't reachable via the Internet. If you aren't sure how to cite sources there are some examples here, and I'd be happy to help. - Pointillist (talk) 17:52, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Btw, if you would like to archive the old messages on this page, here's how.

Yes, I have them and will add now.--Robert (talk) 18:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on the extra info and references. For clarity I have re-arranged the material around the locations. Would you like to take a look and correct/improve/revert as appropriate? Thanks - Pointillist (talk) 23:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Hale Building, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.hale-building.com/news.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 18:50, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{hang on}}

A tag has been placed on August Brentano requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Raziman T V (talk) 18:25, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Oyster Bay Restaurant, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oyster Bay Restaurant. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Warrah (talk) 18:34, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Maurice Forman Restaurant requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Jezhotwells (talk) 04:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert, just FYI I copied your recent comment in favor of keeping this article from the article's talk page over to the AfD discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oyster Bay Restaurant. --Glenfarclas (talk) 04:16, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Joan Bergere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Classic WP:BLP1E, WP:NOT#NEWS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ray^Talk 21:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Joan Bergere, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joan Bergere. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ray^Talk 07:56, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Joan Bergere. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Ray^Talk 21:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you created a new article on Gloria Eves but, having read over it and does some searching, it seems that she might be a case of WP:BLP1E: she has no notability outside of this one incident, which is the focus of her entire article. In fact her article barely covers the subject itself. It may be better as a redirect to Bo Belinsky with all that information placed there. Otherwise, it's likely to be deleted given Wikipedia's policies on living people. What do you think? Cheers, CP 23:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's debatable because although Eves is not very important as a person aside from the incident, the altercation itself has bearing on Belinsky's career, which took a turn for the worse afterward. Also there is importance because of the violence toward women and in particular its having been perpetrated by an athlete. If you want to merge it with Belinsky it is fine. I am wary that if some of the baseball committee sees it they will eliminate it. The repercussions on Belinsky are not obvious to those who have not read extensively about him. Thanks for your post--Robert (talk) 16:52, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, forgot about this. I'll have a look at it again tomorrow and integrate it properly into the Belinsky article, and the keep an eye out to make sure that no one simply removes it without discussion. Canadian Paul 02:58, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, finally went ahead and did this. Please let me know if there's trouble and I'll come discuss it with the editors. Now, however, I'm concerned about Roxana Sand, who also seems non-notable outside of her one incident, again a WP:BLP1E problem. Trouble with this one is that I wouldn't know where to merge it to... Canadian Paul 05:57, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roxana Sand might perhaps go under King Levinsky as he was a well-known boxer of the era. In fact this might be the reason there has thusfar been no attempts to delete RS.--Robert (talk) 19:16, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Marian McGuire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marian McGuire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 23:06, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Ethel Gibletts, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethel Gibletts. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:20, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 22:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Joanne Arena, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joanne Arena. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 16:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion has begun about whether the article Dotty O'Dell, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dotty O'Dell until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.  Mbinebri  ^{talk ←} 21:45, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Ixion Bicycle Club requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. E. Fokker (talk) 19:44, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was trying to determine if you were the one who edited an article on Herman Husband 31 May 2009 and wrote that Husband may have been related to Benjamin Franklin. I am related to Herman Husband and have conducted extensive genealogical researtch, but know of no familial connection to Franklin on this family line. I'd appreciate it if you could confirm if you did or did not add that quip, and if so where this suggestion might have come from. Thanks! --Nick Sheedy (N.M.Sheedy) — Preceding unsigned comment added by N.M.Sheedy (talk • contribs) 04:08, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Not sure who did the edit, but it wasn't me.----

Sorry, I did add some to the article, but nothing about Franklin. Good luck in tracking the contributor down.

Best Robert

The article Jacqueline Dyris has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

doesnt seem to meet the criteria described in WP:NACTOR

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 109.64.96.169 (talk) 22:39, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jane Lee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced bio of non-notable person

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bluefist ^talk 01:35, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Teuber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Teuber until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --MelanieN (talk) 01:36, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

In the Louise Teuber AfD debate, you made some incorrect statemens about the nominator, MelanieN. You said she claimed to be a "veteran administrator" when in fact her user page correctly says that she is a "veteran editor", defined as an editor with more than 8000 edits and at least two years of service. With 8277 edits, she qualifies. You said that she shows "little talent in writing" implying that she specializes in deleting content rather than creating it. Her edit history shows that she has created lots of new content, as you have yourself. You objected to the deletion debate process, stating that once MelanieN had nominated the article, there is "no chance that it will remain". This is incorrect. I have participated in hundreds of deletion debates where the article was kept. Those were articles about notable topics, and in many cases, the articles were improved, expanded and referenced during the course of the debate. You may want to consider withdrawing your factually inaccurate assertions about MelanieN.

In this case, out notability guideline WP:VICTIM, a product of consensus, indicates that this particular biography in its current form and with its current title, does not belong on Wikipedia. However, an article on a series of unsolved San Diego 1930s murders, presumably by the same killer, may well be justified by policy and guidelines. I recommend that you userfy the current article and incorporate the content into such a future article. Instead of offering little more than harsh criticism of the editor who nominated this article for deletion, why not assume that she was acting in good faith, respond to the policy concerns raised in the debate, and consider how an article about these murders might be written that honors Wikipedia's policies and notability guidelines. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 21:02, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Robertg9! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:02, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mary Lou Sorrells is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mary Lou Sorrells until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:40, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In Silvia Odio, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Histrionic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Wargasm (Word), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages New Yorker, Paul Goodman and Harpers Magazine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:31, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Robert,

Before you move on, would you please take some quality time to read and digest:

• Wikipedia:Citing sources

And please use the:

• Template:Citation

It would be most helpful if you knew how to add references correctly.

Also see: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Titles

Articles/chapters go in quotes, names of periodicals (newspapers/magazines/journals) go in italics. Of course, if you use the {{citation }} template, it does it for you automatically. > Best O Fortuna (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are not researching your topics thoroughly. For example, Herman Kahn is credited with coining the term "Wargasm" while at the RAND Corporation in the late 1950s and early 1960s. But you make no mention of it. I think that you jump the gun and post things up without dotting the "i's" and crossing the "t's". > Best O Fortuna (talk) 23:20, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, yeah, I forgot.

Could also please not link dates, especially in references. See:

• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

Thanks again! > Best O Fortuna (talk) 23:31, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article Olive Eat (Restaurant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Station1 (talk) 07:49, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Clem Koshorek, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Strickland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in Algeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WAM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Helen Sensburg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to German, Russian, Aka and Naples, New York

Baroness Sigrid von Laffert (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kaiser Wilhelm

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in Algeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page AFRICOM (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed that you started the Marjorie Montgomery article and have her listed as both a child actress and a fashion designer. I am wondering, however, if the sources you use make an explicit connection between the two being the same person, because I cannot find any online sources that do so, and some contradict the idea that they are one and the same. For example this source says that she was born in Rockford, Illinois in 1913, not Sikeston, Missouri in 1912. Of course, this site could very much incorrect, but I'm just curious if the offline sources you used made the connection... Canadian Paul 20:39, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Paul,

It's been awhile on this article. I no longer have access to the Ohio reference which I used. The LA Times sources I do have access to still. I will check some more for you.Robert (talk) 04:49, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nancy Carole Tyler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nancy Carole Tyler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:17, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I deleted the word "embiotic" from Hugh Keough's cause of death. After researching it, I could find no definition of, or reference to, the term "embiotic pneumonia". If I am wrong, please tell me where you found such a condition. - Michael David (talk) 15:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarificationRobert (talk) 22:52, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Just a brief note to say that I have made your short article Glen Miller (White Supremacist) a redirect, since I found a more comprehensive article under the guy's full name. It seemed to me that the information in your article was covered in the other article.

Best wishes Quiet Editor (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing me!Robert (talk) 22:51, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited 2012 in Algeria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:24, 14 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sophie Gimber Kuhn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophie Gimber Kuhn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wkharrisjr (talk) 14:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robertg9, I just wanted to let you know that I nominated your article Bruyere Suit for deletion (although I would strongly encourage you to create an article for Madame Bruyere herself) as a Bruyere suit simply means any suit designed by that designer. While doing so, I also came across your article Dormoy Suit, similar issue, but decided to simply redirect that to Marcelle Dormoy and turn it into a biographical article on the designer. I see you've created articles for other fashion related topics, such as Jester blouse and Harlequin print, which seem slightly contrived as subjects for articles although certainly worthy of mention in biographical articles on their designers. For instance, an article on the designer Louella Ballerino would be more useful than articles on individual garments she designed unless they are in themselves particularly notable or have become common terms (which harlequin print certainly has, although I'm not sure "jester blouse" has.) Seriously though, they're not bad articles, I think their focus is just a little bit misplaced, and there are certainly better articles in there that need to be extracted. With all best wishes, Mabalu (talk) 17:44, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Louise Groothoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Louise Groothoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Orlady (talk) 15:49, 4 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for creating this article. It has been tagged for notability for 4 years. I've just removed this, but without more sources, it is in danger of others re-adding it or prodding it. Can you look it over and see if you can help prove it meets WP:NOTABILITY? Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 08:27, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course it does. The Collector of the Port of New York was once the most important politically appointed job in New York state. Chester A. Arthur, U.S. President from 1881-1884, was a former holder of the office. Best Robert.Robert (talk) 01:29, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margie Lee Winn is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margie Lee Winn until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gtwfan52 (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William Lloyd Rambo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Lloyd Rambo until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheMightyQuill (talk) 17:43, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Cheri Jo Bates, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Yaush (talk) 15:25, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Atlantida (ancient city) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atlantida (ancient city) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dougweller (talk) 16:31, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Corwin Thompson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corwin Thompson until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 08:14, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Normandy Cafeteria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Normandy Cafeteria until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pburka (talk) 13:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Del Pezzo Restaurant has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only trivial mentions uncovered in my search as per WP:BEFORE - indications are that this restaurant is not notable enough for an article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 01:39, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nicolai Gedalia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Young stockbroker who committed suicide fails WP:BIO, the article appears to claim notability based on the individual's father, as described by the obituary which is the only source. WP:NOTINHERITED Vrac (talk)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Vrac (talk) 22:36, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your work on Depth perception, I was hoping you might be able to help draft the "Perception of size" section of Draft:Size. Cheers! bd2412 T 03:07, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lane Drug Stores has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails to meet our notability standards.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lane Drug Stores is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lane Drug Stores until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Epeefleche (talk) 19:26, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Old Burnside Yard has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 19:27, 18 May 2015 (UTC) Uncertain why my article cannot be expanded as I have plans to do so myself.Robert (talk) 22:57, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ginny Augustin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ginny Augustin until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:23, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Garfinkel Painting Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability requirements

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 19:17, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have written a number of articles back on 2009 about companies of similar trivial importance in NYC based for the most part on bankruptcy records. Before I list them for deletion, I wonder if you could help me by explaining what you had in mind. If this is part of a project with the material meant for expansion, I don't want to delete them. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dern Food Company requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 06:59, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Munch Sweets, Incorporated requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 07:00, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gold Ting Restaurant Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 07:01, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldnude.jpgJPG.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vintagenude.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:28, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Powers.jpg.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Vintagenude.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kurt Anker Nielsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability: significant coverage cannot be found; resume-style content on a non-notable executive.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Virginia Rangle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Textbook example of BLP1E/BIO1E situation, also NOTNEWS

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 16:35, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article April Flowers has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, poorly sourced for a BLP, formerly deleted subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 2A03:2267:0:0:A1C6:45EC:5523:78DF (talk) 14:36, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lautman's Dairy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG: BEFORE did not produce significant coverage in demonstrably independent and reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —swpb^T 12:52, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Brunswick Silk Works, Inc. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ThePortaller (talk) 22:10, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Annis-Krapes Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Realize this is an older company, but I am unable to find references through searches of Google Books, News, Web search, newspaper archives, Newspapers.com or HighBeam Research. Prodding instead of sending to AfD or requesting speedy in hopes that someone more familiar with the topic can find sources that I have been unable to.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CNMall41 (talk) 19:23, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Bontal Restaurant Corporation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 11:55, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ana Colja is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ana Colja (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:20, 8 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Oldnude.jpgJPG.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:32, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margaret Ehrlich is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Ehrlich until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 22:53, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Anne Meister has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A BLP of an individual with no claim of notability. The only sources being used are directories, and I have been unable to find any reliable third party sources demonstrating notability for this individual.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 23:10, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robert.

I find it doubtful that you will ever see this, as it doesn't look like you have been on Wikipedia (or at least used this account) in over eight years. It's just that I recently discovered the article on Cossutia, with some interesting phrasing:

"Cossutia was a woman from a modest Roman family who became engaged to Julius Caesar prior to his assuming the toga of manhood."

The phrase "assuming the toga of manhood" struck me as non-encyclopedic (or at least non-Wikipedic), so I removed it, and replaced it with a more formal wording. I began to wonder, however, when was this interesting choice of words added to the article? So, I checked the article's history, and was shocked to discover that it had been there since the very beginning, ever since you created it, complete with that phrase, way back in 2010.

The phrase is gone now, but for me, it just baffles the mind that something written in that nature could remain so for nine whole years, especially on a page linked to by one as popular as Julius Caesar.

Alex Devens (talk) 20:33, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Traycho Belopopski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No basis for a biographical article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 06:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Robertg9!

I am researching Fay Tincher and noticed you have made some contributions to her page — specifically her residence with Havey in a bungalow. I am trying to find more information about her and was wondering if you could help me.

Thank you!

2605:E000:5E51:EA00:FD6D:379B:E639:B242 (talk) 22:34, 27 February 2020 (UTC) Leah[reply]

The article Alpheus Smith has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A biography on an individual that does not appear to pass the WP:GNG. The two sources currently in the article are only a one-sentence mention, and his obituary. Searching for additional sources did not turn up anything.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rorshacma (talk) 15:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arantxa Santamaria is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arantxa Santamaria until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Boleyn (talk) 21:51, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lettler^{hello • contribs} 19:30, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gerda Warko has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not claimed or demonstrated. Probably the same person as Gerda Markov who is mentioned in the article Helene Sensburg, perhaps her maiden name, but I am not going to state that without verification

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Fayenatic London 10:57, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:28, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Ellsworth UFO sighting has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article has been tagged for sourcing problems etc for over ten years. It cites nothing beyond a mass-market 'UFO' book as a source, and I can't find evidence for significant coverage of this alleged incident anywhere in acceptable sources beyond the usual 'UFOlogists', and contend derived from this article itself.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndyTheGrump (talk) 04:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Du Barry Modes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A longstanding article of dubious notability about what appears to have been a briefly active company whose only traces are routine listings of incorporation and a lease. Fails WP:NCORP.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AllyD (talk) 06:53, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Epicgenius (talk) 14:16, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Judge's Chop House has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with multiple substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 23:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Jumble Shop East has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with multiple substantive, independent sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 23:13, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Goodlyne Dress Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 01:19, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Viceroy Dress Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

"New Incorporations" and "New York Charters" are obviously not significant sources for notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 01:28, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Universal Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Three non-notable hotels with the same name don't make a notable topic

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 01:32, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Vanessa Duve has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with multiple substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Universal Hotel has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This page seems to be distinguishing between three separate establishments, none of which have any particular notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epicgenius (talk) 13:26, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fourth National Bank of Chicago has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Park Row Trust Company
• Caltec Citrus Company
• Ess Bee Dress Company
• George Fenner (soldier)
• Compagnacci
• Paprin's Restaurant
• Rutley's Inc.
• Sauquiot Spinning Company

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Richelieu Inc. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources, source [1] is a one-paragraph routine business news blurb not significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 03:54, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Rebecca Weintraub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources, source is a two-paragraph death notice, not significant coverage

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Reywas92^Talk 04:03, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Harding Building has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I attempted to find sources for this building. However, I could only find one instance of significant coverage each for the Harding Building and for the Hotel Sturtevant, and both were related to routine business transactions. That is not enough to pass GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epicgenius (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Manhattan Soap Company has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability not established with substantive sources, Source is just a short, routine business activity blurb

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• Universal Wireless Communication Co., Inc.
• Greeley Bar and Grill
• Ethel Hall
• Robert D. Buttle
• Braus Stores

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Reywas92^Talk 16:34, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Lucius Calpurnius Piso (praetor) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article seems to be conflating several different Calpurnii Pisones, most of whom already have articles. The first Tacitus reference is about Lucius Calpurnius Piso (consul 1 BC) , the son of Rutilia is Lucius Calpurnius Piso Caesoninus (consul 15 BC), the character in Colleen McCullough's novel with bristling eyebrows is Gaius Calpurnius Piso (consul 67 BC), and the law about extortion is apparently a confusion between laws proposed by the consul in 67 BC and Lucius Calpurnius Piso Frugi (consul 133 BC). The consul in 133 BC did have a son, Lucius Calpurnius Piso (praetor 112 BC), who was a praetor and is lacking an article, but this article is so hopelessly muddled that even if he is notable it would probably be better to start from scratch. Fuller discussion of the confusion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome#Lucius Calpurnius Piso (praetor)?. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 16:03, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:01, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UtherSRG (talk) 15:12, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]