User talk:LianneAnna

Language Acquisition

Heijen

I re-arranged some of the material from the joint attention article in the sandbox on Paulas page. Let me know what you think.Amae2 (talk) 05:15, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

LianneAnna
I rearranged a bit on the main page and left a longer possible revision on the talk page. I was trying to reduce the redundancy that seemed to develop between the two sections. See what you think and use what you like. Some rogue references in that section though.
Paula Marentette (talk) 02:37, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The article is good article status now.--Canoe1967 (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where are the references you pointed out on the talk page? I could not find them so I am not sure what needed to be changed? I think we should also do as suggested by Paula and remove the extra citations that are "cited in". Amae2 (talk) 00:53, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please to the info on dogs. Amae2 (talk) 03:22, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Could you also align your citations for everything that comes out of In T. Matsuzawa M. Tomonaga & M. Tanaka (Eds.), Cognitive Development in Chimpanzees (pp.155–171). Tokyo: Springer-Verlag. Thanks.Amae2 (talk) 03:39, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LianneAnna. You have new messages at User talk:Smith609/Archives/#Citation Bot 4.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 07:14, 21 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! LianneAnna, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 22:37, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LianneAnna. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cybercobra (talk) 06:32, 4 April 2012 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Joint attention has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the Talk:Joint_attention#GA_Reassessment. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article.

Please contact me if you have any questions. Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 00:36, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Joint attention, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that infants are so motivated to engage in joint attention that they will turn away from interesting sights to do so? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Joint attention.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Casliber (talk · contribs) 01:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:34, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi! Please take a few minutes to fill out this survey about the Wikipedia Education Program. This is our opportunity to improve the program and resources we provide students, so your feedback and input is integral to our future success. Thank you so much! JMathewson (WMF) (talk) 00:13, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]