User talk:Joe Vitale 5

This is a Wikipedia user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Joe_Vitale_5.

Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page.

This is Joe Vitale 5's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

This user is busy doing nothing a lot and may not respond swiftly to queries.

If you leave a message on this talk page, I'll respond here. You may want to watch this page to catch the response. Click here for a tutorial in watching pages. If you can please use talkback messages - If I've messaged you recently I usually won't be watching your page or otherwise keeping an eye on it.

I have personally watched the music video for Bryan Ferry's "Don't Stop the Dance" several times, and as far as I can tell, Laurence Treil is the only woman featured on there, she is only dressed and made up differently. The two editions of the video are interesting. Notice that the screen shot in the article is of the nude women on the beach. I've linked this article to the G-rated version in the "external links." Pkeets (talk) 00:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe!

Simply just press that big Edit button next to each section, edit what you want, then click on Save, you have now officially learned how to edit. Mazarin07 (talk) 09:56, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

One more message like the one you just sent me, and I will ask the administrators to ban you. Mazarin07 (talk) 12:22, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there a rule about not attacking new editors? I see no bannable offense here Mazarin. You're coming across as very sarcastic in the comment above, and I'm not surprised that it provoked a response. If you can't be helpful, then please just disappear at this point. Thank you. Pkeets (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. He's posting at my page now, so I guess he'll leave you alone. There are always a few Type A personalities in Wikipedia who show up irritable and annoy everyone. There are also trolls. Some edits have to be fought to a compromise because of differing opinions. This means it's not always an encouraging environment. I would recommend strict politeness when things start to go wrong. In other words, Don't let it bother you. Pkeets (talk) 15:23, 5 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not all editors are unfriendly. I'm happy to help any time. Just let me know. Pkeets (talk) 14:16, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Pkeets (talk) 06:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC),[reply]

I received your invitation to help upgrade the Joe Walsh article. That article looks pretty solid already and might just need to be promoted to the community of WP editors that decides on "Good" articles. In any case, I suggest that you compile a list of things that need to be done and then assign specific tasks to your invitees. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 18:01, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your changes because none of them were at all helpful. You blew up the photo past its ideal size, you introduced an unsourced claim about Allman teaching Joe Walsh, and you introduced grammatical errors. Please be more careful with your editing, and leave edit summaries as a courtesy to other users to they can easily see what you're changing. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 14:03, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And your edits to Eagles as well. If you don't have a proper grasp of English grammar, you should not be editing the articles. --Spike Wilbury (talk) 14:05, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that you took offence to that edit summary, but I suppose I was just frustrated at having to look through dozens of edits when each only contained a small wording tweak. Personally I feel you're just as likely to end up with edit conflicts if you make a lot of little edits rather than just working through what you can do to the page in one edit, but really I think edit conflicts primarily occur on pages concerning recent topics. Still, I think it's probably just that our editing styles differ. Ss112 21:16, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm done with the Nik Kershaw page. See write up for the music video of "Wouldn't It Be Good."

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thanks for all the work on music articles in Wikipedia. You're the best! Pkeets (talk) 13:51, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, all done. Pkeets (talk) 15:07, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I will try to put something together for the career of ‎Allan Schwartzberg at the weekend. CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that we need to move discussion about ‎Allan Schwartzberg to the talk page because we are starting to take up space at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rock music, kind regards CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 20:52, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. I'm sorting out some issues with Australian jazz-rock outfit Ayers Rock, which is a long term project for me. I haven't forgotten about Allan, and I do have a plan, but it might take a short while to get back to it. Have a great day. CaesarsPalaceDude (talk) 21:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you request protection on the article? There's been no recent vandalism. Doc talk 11:19, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. I'm on fire today. I took care of your last two requests. Check the Madness Uncle Sam (song) video description and see if you think it's accurate. Is that guy in the jodhpurs wearing a British or German uniform? I can't see it well enough in the video to tell, but I'm thinking it looks German. Pkeets (talk) 16:32, 13 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I've seen you around on The Beatles' articles... Would you consider becoming a member of WikiProject The Beatles, a WikiProject which aims to expand and improve coverage of The Beatles on Wikipedia? Please feel free to join us.

Abbey Road... You're not in this picture... yet! Todo list: To-do list for User:Joe Vitale 5: A list of articles needing cleanup associated with this project is available. See also the tool's wiki page and the index of WikiProjects. Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Articles on each Beatle tour (Category:The Beatles concert tours). See: Missing articles. Expand : The Lost Lennon Tapes, notable radio series which has spawned many bootlegs. Apple Records See also: Adopt an article Stubs : See: Category:The Beatles song stubs Update : Pics/Graphics wanted: Kenwood. Verify : Beatle wives Other : Project: Add {{WikiProject The Beatles}} to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles assessed as stubs onto this list, also list articles needing cleanup and other work here. If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the project log.

Hi Joe. Can I advise you that if you're going to upload new versions of pictures on Commons, you check which articles use them before doing so. For example, File:Peter Gabriel The Moonlight Knight (cropped).png is used on Genesis (band), a fairly high-traffic article, and the new version of commons makes the thumbnail image here very stretched and distorted, so I had to revert it. If you are planning to make any other changes, drop a note on any affected article's talk pages first and check there's a consensus first, otherwise readers will get a surprise. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 11:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Nice job Padredjet (talk) 09:55, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go Padredjet (talk) 10:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The No Spam Barnstar
	well done no spam on you Padredjet (talk) 10:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

cheese Padredjet (talk) 10:54, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

. Padredjet (talk) 10:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC)Padredjet (talk) 10:53, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Running Man Barnstar
	Your work at All True Man is just breathtaking. MaRAno FAN 14:11, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't know why you're going around resizing football club logos, but I would urge you to stop as they look terrible when oversized. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Advice acknowledged. I don't usually edit football articles so I'm basically useless :)
Kind regards,
Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 23:08, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

All reverted now. Please do not change the sizes of club crests without discussion at WT:FOOTY or it could be assumed that you are being disruptive. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 23:59, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I'd also like to apologize, and let you know that I've read the above. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:38, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Josh Lillis has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:51, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Josh Lillis, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:56, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to The Breakup Song (They Don't Write 'Em), it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 22:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you (joe vitale)? I'm also crazy Crazy.rodger (talk) 15:45, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm GiantSnowman. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Danny Rose (footballer, born 1993), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GiantSnowman 08:47, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You've ignored the 1-game 1-goal loan spell already listed in the infobox. GiantSnowman 10:08, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I reverted your edit to Pete Winkelman, I wrote the comment 'please don't offer troll food'. That was a 'brain/finger discontinuity'[!]. What I intended to write was 'please don't offer a bowl for troll food'. So implied insult unintended. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 13:22, 26 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep putting "External links" headings on pages that don't have any external links? I assume there's some reason but... I don't get it. -- Walnuts go kapow (talk) 12:38, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same query here. Please don't do this - we don't add an external links section unless there are valid links to include. Your edits will need to be reverted. Moondyne (talk) 08:23, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My sincerest apologies. Revert away, and don't worry about me adding "External links" in future. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:19, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joe, could you please stop adding See Also sections to player articles with links to the season article as it's WP:Recentism. Thanks, JMHamo (talk) 19:01, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your wish is my command. Best wishes Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:02, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there JV, from Portugal,

a couple of lines explaining my changes in this footballer's introduction, and thus some guidelines: it's not necessary to include all the clubs he (has) represented, and certainly it is now mandatory we don't include divisions of clubs in the intro. Last but not least, no need to mention the goals he scored in X or Y season (unless it's something important, like in 2011-12 with Almería like I now point out in the current version) or that he scored on his debut, that is the "job" of the storyline proper.

If Mr. Ulloa had any form of international career, of course that would also be intro-material, but he has not. Last but not least, I am not a newbie even though I edit anon now, I used to be User:AlwaysLearning, but asked that my account be vanished after a serious run-in with a troll, had the intention of leaving forever, but seems I cannot :(

Sorry for any inconvenience, was only trying to help. Happy editing, cheers --84.90.219.128 (talk) 00:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine. 'Stay Up' & stay cool Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:08, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Minor barnstar
	Nice Edits Ddrap14 (talk) 21:12, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Since you're a contributor to Wikiproject Rock, would you be interested in reviewing my FAC for the article xx (album)? Apart from some hollow support votes, it's received only one complete review/commentary, so any feedback would really be appreciated. Dan56 (talk) 08:02, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you! nitrogen (talk) 09:33, 18 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please your completion fill out this Articles The volleyball team and other players. Development volleyball in wikipedia Are waiting you. Good luck. Jacilason (talk) 10:43, 19 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. I went through it and tidied up a few sentences, but I'm wondering about the amount of detail in the beginning summary. I'm thinking it pretty much repeats what's below and should be cut down. What do you think? Pkeets (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Same as you. God, I sound like a robot ("every thought that's in my head, someone else has said" quote from The Who's 905) Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:32, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. Do you have any idea where this comes from? I can't find the statement anywhere and it definitely needs a citation. "They might have done better signing to Island, whose owner Chris Blackwell made several impassioned pleas to the band, culminating in an helicopter dash to a Midlands gig where he made a final appeal for the band sign to Island."

No sorry Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:07, 21 August 2015 (UTC)(UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Jon-Paul Pittman. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:58, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	well done nitrogen (talk) 08:38, 8 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

--Rubbish computer (Merry Christmas!: ...And a Happy New Year!) 16:07, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

So I noticed your user name (Joe Vitale 5) and noticed you are also working on the Joe Walsh article. I read your userpage, and it doesn't look like you are related, but perhaps you are. Are you related to Joe Vitale (musician)? He has a long association with Walsh and is also from Northeastern Ohio. --Jayron32 19:17, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No I'm not Jayron32, Joe Vitale is a very popular name but I am in contact with the one that you're talking about, real nice guy. Have a good day Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:56, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. I'm just letting you know that I've reversed your edit. I know it was in good faith, so no problem there, but as the article subject hasn't expressed any particular political view and the section is really about how he has been mentioned in reference to politics, the established title for the section seemed more appropriate to me. Thanks. Rodericksilly (talk) 14:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okelly-dokelly Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:34, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Good morning Joe! For my learning, if you do not mind me asking, why did you upload a cropped version of File:Mike Shipley.jpg with a larger file size? --Jax 0677 (talk) 14:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Morning. I thought that it looked better cropped and didn't know that I had uploaded it with a larger file size. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

• Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Joe. Is this wrong about his heritage? https://www.discogs.com/artist/424154-Andy-Qunta Pkeets (talk) 03:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is Pkeets, I'm in contact with him personally and he actually had a go at the article himself! Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, thanks.Pkeets (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Sheri Kershaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Magnolia677 (talk) 01:40, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I added to the article, but it's been tagged for Speedy Deletion. I challenged (see talk page), but her notability mostly rests on who she's been associated with. If you went to help defend the article, you might check in on the deletion discussion. See talk page. Pkeets (talk) 01:50, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello-

• Please make a habit of providing an edit summary when you make a change to an article. Doing so makes it easier for your colleagues here to understand the intention of your edit.
• Plus, it will be easier for you and your co-editors to collaborate on articles if, instead of making multiple consecutive edits in rapid succession on an article, you use the "Show preview" button to view your changes incrementally before finally saving the page once you're satisfied with your edits. This keeps the page history of the article less cluttered.

Thanks in advance for considering these suggestions. Eric ^talk 12:06, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mburrell, I hope that you're doing well. I noticed your edit summery of "return of information about the assault on Mia Zapata", her article claims that she was "possibly raped". I thought that was a good enough reason to remove from the Joan Jett article that she was actually raped as it would mean that the two article contradict one another in claims. Give me your thoughts! Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Evil Stig page says rape. I don't visit the Mia Zapata page, so I didn't know of the different wording. But here are three news articles. (http://www.rollingstone.com/tv/news/gits-drummer-blasts-nbc-for-exploiting-mia-zapatas-death-on-tv-20140114), (http://pitchfork.com/news/34514-mia-zapatas-killer-sentenced-for-good-finally/), (http://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/killer-of-seattle-singer-again-sentenced-to-36-years-in-prison/). As far as I know, there is no controversy about the rape, and it seems the page that needs to be fixed is the Mia Zapata article. Mburrell (talk) 16:29, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! BW, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:46, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing infobox templates without any discussion or consensus. Mlpearc (open channel) 00:48, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. » Shadowowl | talk 13:21, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Joe Vitale 5: Please read this message.-- » Shadowowl | talk 13:32, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Talk:Chazablanca requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. » Shadowowl | talk 15:28, 24 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:516CnyRdoFL SY355 .jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 14:38, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Rubbish computer (HALP!: I dropped the bass?) 20:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe Vitale. Items tagged as non-free reduced or orphaned non-free revisions need a date stamp in order to get processed properly. The simplest way to do this is through substituting the template; i.e. use {{subst:orfurrev}}, which will automatically add the current date for you. Thanks, — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:25, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Thank you, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 09:43, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article on the glamour model/porn star Cathy Barry has been put up for deletion. I've added lots of referenced info (even though, it seemed obvious to me that she was very notable beforehand) - I'd appreciate it if you could take a look at the article and vote (either way). I would vote myself, but not sure if an unregistered IP would be accepted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.69.109.128 (talk) 11:13, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Cheers, LovelyLillith (talk) 20:18, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Among your changes to Lou Reed today, you added templates that the article uses British English and day-month-year format. In fact, the article uses American English almost exclusively and month-day-year format. Was it a mistake, or do you intend to change the spelling and date formats? — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:50, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, it was a mistake, sorry. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:10, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Hi. I know you edit Alexander O'Neal-related articles so I thought I'd let you know that I've created one for the compilation This Thing Called Love: The Greatest Hits of Alexander O'Neal if you want to improve on what I've done or add any further info that you have. Thanks! --Geach (talk) 00:46, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe. Please consult Wikipedia:Preparing images for upload for why PNG image files are preferred over JPEGs apart from photographs. Thanks. Ss112 18:18, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have changed some music topic genres without referencing to support the change. Please read WP:GWAR. Genres are largely subjective, and should be verifiable. Also, band genres come from sources discussing the band's musical style, and album genres come from sources discussing the album's overall style. Neither of these should be based solely on individual song genres. Binksternet (talk) 20:32, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, Joe, I just undid two of your edits to Frank Zappa and Sting (musician) per the documentation of Template:Infobox musical artist#associated acts. I'm sure you'll understand . Keep up the good work and cheerzzz! - DVdm (talk) 21:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I love that cat on top of this page. - DVdm (talk) 21:25, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, I understand ahah, JV5

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Maladjusted, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.

It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All you bloody had to do was change the infobox to how you wanted it... I work better when I make small edits so I don't have the time to write about every little tweak that I make... Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 00:59, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Stockport Town F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nike (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Other 99.

A New Page Patroller Meatsgains just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:56, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naked Lunch (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Giant centipede (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to Hungary. Unfortunately, they were rolled back because they mostly involved changes to links that are against policy recommendations. The main problem was in your attempted good faith changes to wikilinks, by subsituting in the actual article name instead of a redirect to a page. Actually, this almost always is not an improvement. One way to think about it is, if it ain't broke, WP:DONOTFIXIT. Another explanation can be seen at WP:NOPIPE concerning the use of piped links. Two or three of your changes involved adding links where there wasn't one before, and these could be reinstated if desired; I'll be happy to do it for you after the holidays upon request. A couple of the early changes involved Magyarization of names of people who went by non-ethnic Hungarian names; it's better just to use the names they preferred, or how they are most commonly known (sometimes this can be hard to determine; in that case, the name of their Wikipedia article, if they have one, is a good starting point). And please add an Edit summary with each of your edits, to help other editors understand the intent of your changes. All the best, Mathglot (talk) 08:41, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, same problem at János Kádár and Goulash communism. I hope there are not more of these. Please stop making further changes to wikilinks that do not change where you end up when you click the link. Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 08:54, 25 December 2018 (UTC) And at Hungarian language, but this predates the notice above so no worries; fixed. Mathglot (talk) 23:56, 28 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paul Westwood is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Westwood until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:55, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Until the End of Time (Twins album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NALBUM. No assertion of notability for the album itself, and no reliable independent sources online about the album.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richard3120 (talk) 14:25, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've just redirected it to the group's article, which is a more valid target. Richard3120 (talk) 14:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 10¢ a Dance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Safety in Numbers (David Van Tieghem album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lamp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

nice work polishing it up! Was just playing this yesterday :-D - David Gerard (talk) 19:42, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, sir. It is a half-decent album! ahah.

Party, party! Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:48, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lizzy Mercier Descloux, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CBS Records (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:21, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Good Together (album), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 10:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What in the hell? It has 3 references. I don't appreciate my hard work being "drafted". I spend a lot of time on articles like these, time I will not get back. And there are many album articles out there without any references whatsoever so what's so wrong about mine? Not fair, and I'm not happy, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 10:50, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ACRGoodTogether.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 6 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Points on the Curve, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wang Chung.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joe Vitale 5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Good Together (album), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joe Vitale 5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Good Together".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:56, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wikipedians who like Joe Walsh has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 01:36, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SEFE.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. It is recommended to not replace redirects with piped links, as you did recently at Mia Khalifa. More info is at MOS:NOPIPE. Thanks. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 01:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And again at Belle Knox, where you changed the target of a link inside a direct quote, which is highly discouraged. Please stop this. Thank you. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 23:59, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

And if you look carefully you'll see that that was edited before both of your messages. Please be more diligent. Thank you, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:12, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, my mistake. --Sangdeboeuf (talk) 22:54, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I have been a Wikipedian since 2014 so any mistakes I do make will probably be due to a force of habit in my editing style rather than anything purposely disruptive but I'll bear this in mind, and work on it. Thank you, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Maureen Steele has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 14:57, 29 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe. I'm not sure, as you didn't provide an explanation, why you separated the track listing of Thank You by Diana Ross into vinyl sides when the album was released in 2021. Vinyl is no longer the dominant format, as you know, and there's nothing to indicate the album was intended for the vinyl format (and it definitely was not vinyl-only). So I've reverted this change. Fair enough if this were Ross's albums from before the mid-80s, but not for an album released in 2021—if you are making these sorts of unexplained changes on other articles, like separating albums released beyond the 1980s into vinyl sides, you should have a very compelling reason to do so like those I just mentioned or not be doing so. Also, we don't need to explicitly credit the liner notes in a citation per MOS:ALBUM—it is expected this is where personnel come from. Thanks. Ss112 08:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:35, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe. Just jumping into my old thread here to say you don't need to capitalise the 's' in 'revxscore' in Template:Album ratings. It's been decapitalised for years now. Also, I don't know if you're still doing so, but as I've just seen your edits from earlier this month on Christine McVie (album), just a reminder to not split albums released after the vinyl era (so from the 1990s to present) into sides, unless you can demonstrably prove the album was still intended for the vinyl format. I think albums released after 1982 with CDs becoming a thing then (even if it did not become the predominant format until the late '80s) are an edge case so I don't even think say, albums released in 1984 need to be split into vinyl sides if they aren't already. Ss112 03:45, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But with all due respect, weren't cassette tapes with sides one, and two the leading formats at that time?

Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:16, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a source for cassette sales exceeding vinyl sales in 1984? Also, again, please stop re-capitalising the 's' in "score" in Template:Album ratings. It was decapitalised in the template documentation years ago. Ss112 02:08, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember always to check your links: the blue link in your photo caption set the supermarket as being in the lake. I've fixed it. PamD 07:00, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I did not realize as I'm not from those areas, and just expected the links to be where they were if that makes sense. Naive rather than lazy, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 16:05, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing other editors posts. - FlightTime (open channel) 01:16, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:United States of Islam.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bête Noire (album), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phoenix and Berkeley.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ThatCertainSmile.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Everybody Have Fun Tonight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Folk.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You must have made like 20 edits in 50 minutes on the article In the name of love. Ever heard of the Show Preview feature ?! I mean, your work is very good and appreciated, but damn ... that insane list of edits in the history! -- Lyverbe (talk) 11:16, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it improves the article than that's all that should really matter as that's all that the reader really sees anyway IMO (better than not improving the article at all I should think?). I have reading, and some spelling difficulties (I have to Google spellings often) which may seem ironic given how prolific I am here but the small edits help me to check things off whilst making sure that I make no mistakes (I still do), and I would struggle to proof read anything that I've corrected... Hence doing things in small doses making any of this possible for me. I understand your issue, and why you've raised it but it feels like an essential way of editing for me that has worked since 2014... Almost a decade ago now, I'm feeling very old. Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:48, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:54, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:5 Tracks Deep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:05, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edit just now on Manchester. I learned something now about the MOS and how bands name "The xxx" are described within articles. It's something I'll remember for future edits, but I do however notice that if this is a rule it's not consistently followed or enforced. A quick look-see at The Verve showed relatively poor compliance, while The The was much better but nowhere near 100%. Would it not be better to fix all music articles before reaching out elsewhere? Just a (polite) thought... 10mmsocket (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I spend most of my time doing this on articles, honestly. Manchester was just next on that "list". Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:26, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know what you mean. I do similar on other issues. 10mmsocket (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe. I had reverted your Whammy! track listing edit back on April 3 because I don't see anything in WP:TRACKLISTING that suggests writing credits should be formatted with the hlist template and separated by bullets. (In fact the examples given there use plain commas as separators instead of any special mark-up.) Additionally, WP:STYLEVAR states When either of two styles are acceptable it is inappropriate for a Wikipedia editor to change from one style to another unless there is some substantial reason for the change, and that edit-warring over style, or enforcing optional style in a bot-like fashion without prior consensus, is never acceptable.

If it's a matter of personal preference, I'd probably agree that bullets do look better, but we can't really use that as a guiding principle when editing. To my knowledge, there is nothing in the MOS here that states credits have to or should be laid out in that fashion. Hope that helps. Cheers.—The Keymaster (talk) 21:50, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I usually go off if the infobox has them first, and it did, and still does... So thought that it would look more congruent with both that, and the track listing having hlists. Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe! I am new to this. And I had seen that */Annabella Lwin/* was featured on two songs 1. I kiss The Morning Sun Song and Mo Money Song; with musical artist and producer Durango Dank. I tried to follow the same format. And yet, Binksternet Michael Knowles (Producer), and egghead6; shut me down "Claiming promotions, and spam. And yet it's the same format. And instead of these two keeping open minds, and think like educators, for the betterment of your craft, and your platforms. these two should take the necessary steps to advance the work they try to do. Instead of Shutting ME DOWN! these 2: ARE TROLLS in the Metaverse! AND THEY HAVE BEEN INDEXED AS SUCH! These two could learn a lot by your work! And the Legacy you will leave behind for others to admire, and walk in your footsteps. Be the teacher, the educator that you are just in your work alone. But I would really like to learn how this all works. And share ides, and stories. Not just getting canceled, and blocked. (A Troll in the metaverse comes in many forms. This form is entities that destroy stories based off what they feel, or perceive! To the actual reality of events, and circumstances; that don't fit the heavy handedness of "Binksternet Michael Knowles" (Producer), and egghead6 actions toward other people uploads. The Good news Artificial intelligence knows al! And it all stars with our voices, and cross talk indexing. But I'm sure once these two realize they are not in good standing with SOCIALCREDITSYSTEMSCORESANDRANKINGS.COM. 2601:282:700:ED50:FDBC:DC3A:A783:F80 (talk) 14:39, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make edits where you only remove whitespace characters and capitalize the first letter of templates, like in Special:Diff/1161553863/1163358041. This fills up article histories with useless edits, clogs watchlists, and tends to annoy editors who prefer to have the whitespace there. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:46, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seconded. Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Joe. I know you have been here for a while so I'll skip the convenient template. However I saw on Billy Idol that you assigned him some band in the infobox which is mentioned in the prose only once as having existed for a single set in 2018. Do you have any sources you can cite that "Generation Sex" is an actual, ongoing act? If you do, please add them when you revert my reversion of your edits. And could you, in future, please use edit summaries? Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 18:32, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

They're currently on tour. Just Google them, I mean they played Glastonbury Festival recently too so if you think that this is some imaginary or one-off performance band then I don't know what else to say. Thanks for the reversion, and edification, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:55, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cale, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bexhill.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Joe, Why are you refractoring all these talk page posts ? - FlightTime (open channel) 14:17, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Felt like cleaning it up, and adding links to the pages that people were referring to would make it easier to read, and thus post/respond to. A more congruent-style may also help others (like me) in the aforementioned ways, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't do that - FlightTime (open channel) 14:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with FlightTime; please don't do that. It's appropriate to move newer threads to their proper location at the bottom of a Talk page, or use a template to sign unsigned posts, or even to fix WP:LISTGAP and MOS:INDENTMIX problems, as I have done here, but not to actually edit somebody else's posts. I've just reverted that exact string of 31 edits, but have left your previous string of 6 untouched. — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 20:56, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 22:14, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please review WP:OVERLINKING Thanx, - FlightTime (open channel) 03:28, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, again, Joe. While I'm here whining, I might as well complain about something else: I see that of the 93 edits made to Alice Cooper in this calendar month alone, all but 6 were made by you. You made 61 edits in a two-and-one-half-hour period this morning, most of them of about 20 bytes or fewer (but none marked as "minor"). These all appear in my watchlist, listed separately, so it's quite overwhelming. I'd therefore like to point you to three more pages, which might help you fit in more successfully:

• Help:Show preview (mentioned to you in August 2016)
• Help:Minor edit
• Help:Edit summary (mentioned to you in July 2016)

I'm surely not the only editor who will be grateful if you would use Preview more often and combine multiple edits before publishing your changes. And when your edits are minor ones, please mark them as such. A brief explanation of what you're doing is also always welcome. Thanks, — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 12:26, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You can’t mark them as minor on your phone or else I would have — a lot of these edits had to be done one by one as I was sorting out references— and I could only do that as I saw them — as I had to individually search each link manually switching between windows full screen (which took me three hours). It was just as tiresome, and as overwhelming for you as it was me, I’m sure… but I’m finished with those sort of edits to that article. Other than them being minor, I actually really cleaned that up. If my editing style that has been here since I first started editing articles is a conflict of interest then I don’t know what I can do. Regards, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:41, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, do the edits you made on Bill Skarsgård such as this not count as WP:COSMETIC? From what I can tell none of the changes are visible in practice and were not made accompanied by other changes that did. TylerBurden (talk) 05:35, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is the problem that I didn’t mark them as minor? If so then sorry. Working on my phone doesn’t give me as much freedom — including marking edits as minor. Thanks, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:15, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Like the link says "edits of such little value that the community deems them to not be worth making in bulk" such edits aren't considered worth making in the first place, at least not accompanied by other meaningful changes. TylerBurden (talk) 05:31, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:-Fa-Tal- Gal a Todo Vapor.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete or generic. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact source (such as the web page, or printed document) where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the direct/bare URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. — Ирука¹³ 21:45, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. 26 edits and not one of them materially improving the article. All of them pointlessly adding or removing spaces here or there, or a capital letter in a template. Seriously, stop. Or at least put all your pointless edits into a single edit. Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're not even consistent. In this edit you changed === Film === to ===Film=== (removing spaces inside the heading markup) and in this one you changed ==External links== to == External links == (inserting spaces inside the heading markup) . What's the point? Wikipedia users won't see any difference, and Wikipedia editors will either prefer one way or the other, or not care. Dave.Dunford (talk) 09:30, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with this. JoeVitale5 makes tons of useless edits without ever using the Show Preview buttons cluttering everyone's Watchlist page. This is the kind of editor we do not want. -- Lyverbe (talk) 12:04, 22 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe, please stop inserting additional chronologies for albums. There was a consensus against doing this at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Albums/Archive 62#Multiple infobox chronologies. The only real time extra chronologies are accepted now is when more than one artist is credited on a song or album. Thanks. Ss112 11:22, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I just thought that it made it easier to go onto the next studio album rather than have to go to artists template box or click through live album, compilations, and etc, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 00:26, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you make this series of edits? It seems like (comparing two revs) all you did was add white space. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:08, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just for you to revert, evidently enough. ―Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 00:12, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You made 10 edits in a row and all that was changed was "Portland, Oregon, U.S" to "(Portland, Oregon)", which is not an improvement. Instead of being sarcastic, can you tell me why you did all of that? How are those edits improvements? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:13, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To be, or not to be, to make all articles look similar or the same in their formatting, so that they're easier to read, and more up to date. Please forgive me for my transgression ―Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 00:18, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You ask for good faith from others and then you act like this. Why? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:40, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All humans are hypocrites, especially the ones that pontificate —

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 01:09, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fascinating. Please stop making dozens of edits to whitespace across the millions of articles here. Thanks. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:27, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So is Laura Veirs someone that you’re a fan of ? As I saw her play live last year, and met her briefly afterwards

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 02:46, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've heard one song of hers and it was nice. You're a bigger fan than I am, evidently. Was she a nice person to meet? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sort of, she was in the merch stand at the venue, and clearly only interested in signing things that people bought — but she was still magnanimous enough to sign my gig ticket for me … I can’t consider her in any way rude when the singer for Blancmange had a whole freak out over meeting people — despite telling people that he was going into the merch area to sign things for people, and he again, just freaked out, and whomever it was that was with him was bullying the people trying to meet him. A total fuck up. I understand that he was wary after having had a bad bout of Corona… but why go into a merch area where you’re going to meet people then lose your shit over it? Belied common sense, and left me both confused, and disappointed.

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 03:45, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed: that's not being a good businessman and that was clearly all he was trying to be, so total failure. How was the show? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 03:50, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

For Blancmange? Even without that experience, a bit shit — the singer is still in fine voice but his backing band were awful. He sounded like a Blancmange tribute act — or at worst, a karaoke singer. So put that together with the weird none-meeting wherein he stormed off after looking at me for a couple of seconds, and well, it’s bad business all round ! Haha. They say not to meet your heroes but Morrissey was nicer to me than him, and who’s supposed to be the hated one? I shook his hand, and had a very awkward conversation in which he seemed to either not respond at all or act like a diva (fake). Strange meeting, and a declined photo. “Not in Waitrose” with a covered mouth was his response to that question …

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 04:28, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I mean Laura Veirs, actually, but what you wrote all tracks with my intuitions about those guys. I can say that meeting R.E.M. twice, they were perfect Southern gentlemen (without the negative connotations). ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

How did that meeting come about? Usually I only meet famous people if I have a backstage pass to… but Morrissey, and Alexander O'Neal were random — and Morrissey was nicer than O'Neal who seemed more interested in my black lady friend than me myself (very strange considering she wasn’t a fan so a big creep move on his part to be honest as he seemed irritated by me; yet Morrissey did not lol)

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 05:30, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After their show in Indianapolis, they walked down the line signing autographs and patiently listening to bad poetry and at the Georgia Music Hall of Fame, they descended into the crowd briefly. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:37, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Haha nice one! With the amount of gigs that I go to you probably get performers leaving the stage/barriers only once out of every ten gigs (you can look on my user page to see a list of my gig going). I always find it quite awkward as I prefer to watch shows than to interact with or touch the performers during shows! Another interesting story from me is being crushed into Mark Burgess's armpit during a Chameleons show! Oh I have all the stories, and they’re all cringeworthy haha.

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 05:49, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It's almost never worth it and nowadays, I am much less interesting in bothering these poor guys when they're just trying to enjoy their evenings (unless they deliberately give you the opportunity to say hi). And ultimately, all I have to say is "Wow, you do good at music", which is literally all that millions would have to say to them, so no need to bother them. But it was fun to meet them in particular. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:56, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Strange that you should say that because usually I try to ask technical questions or talk to them about people that they’ve worked with. I think that making them think more about what they’ve got to say can make them either more open or closed off, dependent on who it is. Some people love the sycophancy, and others deplore it… So I suppose I’ve learned that if you’re going to try, and make an impression on a famous person. Don’t talk to them like they’re a famous person - though when I met Morrissey, I said that I loved all of his solo albums, even Kill Uncle, and that made him gasp “oh!”, as he flailed his arms over his head, and took a step back . I confuse celebrities but then again, I run the risk of coming across as a none-fan… but they probably prefer that if you actually want a conversation… but then again, a lot of the time they don’t anyway hahaha.

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 06:22, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe. I passed by the article for Fred Schneider and the Shake Society and noticed you changed the en dashes in the track listing to em dashes and changed the tracks to be continuously numbered. As per WP:TRACKLISTING, en dashes are correct here, and we actually had a lengthy discussion at WT:ALBUMS a while back and amended the MOS to clarify that track listings should always follow the numbering on the original format. (For LP sides, you would start at 1 for each side, except in rare special cases.) Please keep this in mind going forward. Thanks! —The Keymaster (talk) 06:57, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quite old edits but fair enough, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 07:00, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And actually, looking at it further, you also changed "Technical" personnel to "Production and artwork" and linked common instruments, both of which go against what is stated in WP:PERSONNEL. I'm happy to change all of it back for you, but please be mindful of this and change it to the correct formatting if you encounter any examples in the future. Thank you. Cheers! The Keymaster (talk) 07:07, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once you put the magnifying glass on me — I start to melt away, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 07:19, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Heh. No hard feelings. The Keymaster (talk) 07:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Hearsay (album) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 16:21, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Jeez, this took a while to be nominated for deletion! Haha

Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Madness (band) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Hog Farm _Talk 01:15, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you do this? Looking at the two revisions before and after, they seem identical. Is there something I'm missing? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:46, 15 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What was the purpose of this edit? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Javier_Bardem&diff=prev&oldid=1197062339

Are you deliberately making thousands of edits that just move around whitespace? Why are you doing this? ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

To make every article appear the same when read from an editor's perspective, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 06:47, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These do look the same. There is no difference between these. Please stop shuffling around line breaks across hundreds of edits in millions of articles. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop per https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ATeahouse&oldid=1197095834#Twenty-year_editor_here_with_a_question_that_I_cannot_seem_to_answer_on_my_own. If I see more edits like this, I will escalate it to an admin's noticeboard. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:22, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per the above: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAdministrators%27_noticeboard&oldid=1197215292#User_insists_on_making_hundreds_(thousands?)_of_cosmetic_edits,_refuses_to_stop_or_discuss ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 16:16, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You escalated it when I hadn’t even edited at all after your last message, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Granted, but I also once again asked you to stop tinkering with whitespace and you did it many times after that, with no acknowledgement here or any reason other than you just like how "* text" looks more than "*text":

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Margaret_Ferguson_(political_scientist)&diff=prev&oldid=1197071907
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detention_of_Mark_Bernstein&diff=prev&oldid=1197073545
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detention_of_Mark_Bernstein&diff=prev&oldid=1197073604
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ihor_Kostenko&diff=prev&oldid=1197075998
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ihor_Kostenko&diff=prev&oldid=1197076186
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tron_%C3%98grim&diff=prev&oldid=1197077044
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tron_%C3%98grim&diff=prev&oldid=1197077098
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tron_%C3%98grim&diff=prev&oldid=1197077530
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Annie_Rauwerda&diff=prev&oldid=1197078816
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Annie_Rauwerda&diff=prev&oldid=1197079180
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Annie_Rauwerda&diff=prev&oldid=1197079242

In addition to somewhat helpful edits like:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detention_of_Mark_Bernstein&diff=prev&oldid=1197073722
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Detention_of_Mark_Bernstein&diff=prev&oldid=1197074076
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ihor_Kostenko&diff=prev&oldid=1197076116
• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Annie_Rauwerda&diff=prev&oldid=1197078916

And totally confusing and needless things like:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tron_%C3%98grim&diff=prev&oldid=1197077244

So I apologize that I didn't see the timing correctly when I woke up the next day and I posted to AN in a way that seems to contradict what I wrote before, but honestly, having this same conversation with you multiple times across multiple months and you just ignoring it and insisting on hundreds of cosmetic edits still warranted getting someone else to ask you to please finally just stop shuffling around whitespace like a malfunctioning bot. The mistake is mine and I own that, but I don't think posting itself is unwarranted. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:38, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if having been diagnosed with autism will change your perception of my "baffling", and repetitive edits but it has certainly kept me back from wanting to acknowledge things in the past as I don't like to express this fact, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I 100% respect your privacy and if you want to ask for your above rev to be deleted, that is legit. My goal is not to punish or be a jerk: it's to stop having these disruptive edits that make me wonder if there's something meaningfully being changed to articles and then there's not. If there needs to be some accommodation to your editing style or my method of communication or whatever, I'm open to that. This isn't a matter of a moral failing or character flaw, so I'm not trying to come at you as someone who is intentionally causing problems or who is a bad actor. I want you to be able to edit here productively. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:49, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing things in small edits like that is a perfectionism thing for me — not that it's appropriate for articles that I've hardly made any meaningful edits to — but I tend to come back to them eventually to do just that, and I do it subheading via subheading to tick it off so to speak — I understand, and appreciate your concerns however, and how irritating it must be, and clearly is — if I marked these edits as minor then would that stop them from coming up in your watchlist? The problem with that has been when I have been on my cellphone as you cannot mark edits as minor on it — is that what has been the problem?

And you've probably noticed that I never do big edits — that's because I end up confused, and make lots of errors which I do anyway even in small edits.

I think that using my cell more, and also editing more higher profile articles is a big part of what has lead to these ramifications,

Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:22, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I also tend to make smaller edits and save my work, but purely cosmetic edits shouldn't be made. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:48, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Even if part of greater edits? — Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:29, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you're in the middle of making some meaningful and constructive edit and you want to change {{reflist}} to {{Reflist}}, God bless you and go for it. If not, please do not make these kinds of changes per WP:COSMETICEDIT and WP:MEATBOT. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. I will from this point on only do those sort of edits if I’m focused on actually improving an article instead of purely cosmetic edits as you say. If I blur lines I’m sure you will let me know haha, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 18:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being collaborative. Be well. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:59, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My friend, you were asked to stop disrupting. You said in this thread that you know that you have an overwhelmingly chronic propensity for unencyclopedic, uncollegiate, and patently disruptive behavior. You cheaply blamed it on a disorder, admitted to a basic coping mechanism of denialism or avoidance, and continued doing it. That's going from bad to worse to worse. Nobody blames anybody for a disorder until you do that. The photo of the predatory cat at the top of this page is so cruelly apt, that I wonder if you get it. You said you know that editing high profile articles is a problem for you, and you dove into the single highest profile celebrity death in the world today with countless needless edits of cosmetic tweaks to wikilinks and whitespace, exactly like always. Even just the sheer number of consecutive edits is disruptive. BTW your claim that phones magically can't mark edits as 'minor' is false, but that's irrelevant. Wikipedia is WP:NOTTHERAPY. Koavf (talk · contribs) is not your therapist, and he was extremely excessively gratuitously patient and kind. This is not his opinion, and isn't about adapting to him or me at all, but is a fact. Nobody is entitled to the privilege of editing Wikipedia, and editors can be blocked for this disruptive WP:MEATBOT behavior. I advise anybody to stop editing altogether until getting control over behavior, and I want to prevent blocks. Thank you so very much and, yes, be well. Read WP:NOTTHERAPY and WP:MEATBOT right now please. — Smuckola(talk) 02:04, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of language was insulting to put it politely — and so was editing your comment to 'prove a point'. I understand your concerns, and appreciate them — albeit not in the churlish way that you presented them to me. I think that my most irritating edits to other users are when I edit on my phone — again, I have not seen an option to mark these edits as minor, unless I change it to desktop mode which is unequivocally awkward. I feel that whilst my purely cosmetic edits to articles are the most irritating, and to others pointless, when I actually fully focus on an article I do actually improve it — I did in an infinitesimal way with the article that seemed to trigger your message.

However, my editing style often sees me work through things one step at a time, and I only leave articles alone once I feel I have edited everything that could be edited in a congruent way. As whenever I have done big edits there are typos, and erroneous links added. So again, I do it step by step, in a way that is easy for me. I understand how frustrating this looks to other editors however, and I fully accept how that must make them feel.

My editing style has essentially been the same primordially so it's difficult for me to understand how to take any edification, and unfortunately in your case, character assassination. That side of things especially was not on, hence my delay in responding.

Your sincerely,

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:15, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#User_keeps_on_making_cosmetic,_meatbot-style_edits_after_having_been_asked_to_stop_many,_many_times ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 15:58, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am starting to see the issue. Joe, I have a bunch of stuff going on and really didn't need 15 notifications about you. It is in your best interest to chill out. What I just said probably goes triple for every admin on that board.

If the suggestion I made appeals to you, I can suggest a place to start. In that case please ping me and specify any other languages than English that you may speak. If not, good luck to you. I am unsubscribing from the AN thread.Elinruby (talk) 15:37, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It’s probably for the best, sorry. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you would just stop wasting others' time, they wouldn't have this response. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:34, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i actually can make some suggestions about where this kind of OCD energy would be helpful. And I am probably the least of his worries. I just resolved one of mine, so I am talking the time to repeat this. Seriously: it looks like you are going to get a final warning, which you should take seriously if you like editing Wikipedia. If you want to do reference work, ping me and I'll assign you some. I am actually rather difficult to seriously annoy, so this is an opportunity for you to show that you can be an asset. Best wishes either way. Elinruby (talk) 20:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

What did I do wrong? Sorry to have upset you, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:10, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I find it very hard to believe that you think the off-topic rambling about marmite and weird asides on the admin noticeboard was not explicitly wasting others' time. You do this regularly where you just write arcane noise or try to change the topic when someone brings up an issue with your behavior. I hope we're all agreed that the time waste-y stuff needs to stop and that you can and have been a productive editor at times, but endless fiddling with whitespace and making 74 edits that change nothing is a detriment. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:13, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I was talking to Elinruby, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:17, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize. I do think that's rude and try to not butt in. Pardon me. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 21:18, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

He has a point about the Marmite, Joe. AN is especially not a good place for that.

And I am not mad at you. I am trying to show you something productive you can do, ok? I'm just another editor and you don't have to listen to me, but if you are annoying people and there is no excellent reason to keep doing the same thing, then you should stop, k? If you like fiddly stuff, I know about some different fiddly stuff you can do, and which it would be helpful to do, that's all. Elinruby (talk) 21:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand; I’m sorry about my poor behaviour, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to say this at AN. It would also be good to strike the part about saying Justin hates you. It isn't an unreasonable request and it would show good faith. I think he may be annoyed but that is not the same thing. Now. I resolved one of my problems but only one of them. Ping me if you want work, otherwise I am out. Elinruby (talk) 21:49, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PS to strike, put <s> in front and </s> after what you are striking. It shows you realize that that was not a good thing to say. It wouldn't hurt to do the Marmite stuff also, mind you Elinruby (talk) 21:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You spend enough time in England, and you adapt a very dry sort of humour. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:31, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Joe, I'm warning you that you need to stop making the following types of edits, all of which are solely cosmetic and do not affect the article as displayed to readers:

• Adding or removing whitespace or line breaks
• Changing the case of templates
• Adding DEFAULTSORT that matches the article name

There are more types of cosmetic edits out there, but I'm limiting the warning to these in particular because I want to be very clear about what needs to change. If you prolifically make some other type of cosmetic edit, and other editors confront you about it, you need to engage seriously with their concerns.

Normally, cosmetic changes are permitted as part of an edit that does make some change to the reader-facing page, but you should not make any of the changes listed above, regardless of whatever else is changed. You've previously demonstrated a failure to understand when an a cosmetic edit is appropriate, and I'm trying to draw clear lines about what is prohibited.

This warning intentionally does not directly address the concerns, which date back years, about your use of multiple small edits which might instead be bundled into less revisions. I am hopeful that ensuring that each individual is meaningful will lessen the impact of your editing style. Another admin might feel differently about the need for you to change your style, so I encourage you to use the strategies mentioned above (use of a sandbox, use of the preview function) as much as possible.

Please speak up if you have questions about any of this. I think most editors, including those who have criticized your editing, are eager to see change and unexcited about a potential block. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 02:37, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, and apologise for all of this. I suppose that the problem with autistic people is that once they get a certain pattern or way of doing things set inside of their heads, it’s very hard for them to change this. I obviously want to as I don’t enjoy upsetting other people that are just mere editors such as myself. I will spend a couple of days to think on this stuff as I already have been. I derive no joy from pissing people off. Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:24, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe, I'm Chelsea. As someone who has been reading alllll the WP docs and various noticeboards to get acquainted with en.wiki, I stumbled across the recent troubles you've been having. I'm sorry- it can't feel good, and making mistakes that upset others is a *big* fear for me so I can only imagine how stressed you must have been.

I live with OCD that only got diagnosed last year, once it had gotten really debilitating in my 30s. I have a lot of struggles around desiring "completeness," "perfection" etc so what you've described about what's driven your behavior is very relatable to me.

You've gotten some awesome offers of support from people who know a lot more than me, but I thought you might just want a Wiki-friend aside from all that, once you're settled back in and reframing how you participate here. You clearly know a LOT more about most actual aspects of contributing to the site than me, so I would be grateful for a pal I could casually chat with as I get used to the site's tooling and set up my contributing environment. (My OCD has made computers very hard for me psychologically, but I know that more complex and useful contributions require me to get off the darn mobile app.)

In return, if you want to run ideas by me, or even just vent sometimes, I'd be honored to be your buddy and my talk page would be open any time! I am so impressed by the number of live concerts you attend, I have not attended shows in a longgg time (except a band called Ween last year that I've loved since the 90s, not sure if you've ever heard of them!) but you inspire me to remember how cool live music can be.

I have a lot of friends on the autism spectrum- one of my best friends actually founded the comedy troupe Asperger's Are Us, which had a really great miniseries (I think on Netflix). I know it can be confusing and frustrating being neurodiverse in a world made mostly for and by neurotypicals, but diversity is awesome and we can be proud of it and find how we best fit.

From what I can see, even though administrators were frustrated with your behavior, nobody questions that you are here for the right reasons: to build and improve this amazing encyclopedia. I'm sending you best wishes, and hope you do well at bouncing back from this stressful experience and finding new ways to participate, whether you want to become buddies or not! Chiselinccc (talk) 19:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have missed out on quite a few concerts these past three months. Was assaulted at the Mission gig in October, and that triggered me to start drinking again, and much heavier than normal which has caused me health issues that have meant I’ve had to back out of quite a few (just not physically possible to even leave my bed) … but to be honest, I think that my love for them has almost completely died anyway. It’s a lot of stress for very little reward. Despite my heavy drinking I loathe drunk people at concerts. Incidentally, I missed out on seeing Slowdive again on Tuesday (due to just being too drunk), and Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark on Friday, just due to my body giving up on me, and telling me that I had more than overdid it. These sort of regrets are doing me in, but I’ve kind of just totally lost the drive for them anyway. Leave over an hour before the show, wait an hour outside of it, wait an hour inside of it. Opening act! Yawn… main act, yess! But then that’s when people can play up the most or there are random mosh pits (even outside of them), and you just lose all of your motivation for them. Not forgetting, did I leave my door locked? Is my home going to flood? Is it going to set on fire? Did I leave my fridge door open? Is my food shopping even in my fridge? You get it…

So yes, the concerts on paper may look impressive to other people but they were mostly hell to me. The Fizz concert on Sunday however was wholesome, and I think that they’re one of the greatest bands in modern history.

However, my editing style is just that, and I don’t ever see it changing much so I’m kind of just done with this, I think. No point me in trying to help you when it’s clear to others that I can’t help myself.

Best wishes,

Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 01:51, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your honesty, I have the same drinking problem. Hang in there. - FlightTime (open channel) 07:16, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As others may have noticed, I was mainly doing the most for articles of artists that I was going to see — which would turn out greatly embarrassing when I had to miss out on them. I do think that I did help with these, and added a lot of first time photos — not expecting thanks for this as this is a thankless thing that’s to be expected. The drinking has cut down since yesterday, and intends to be cut down even more. Shame when it’s on every corner, and when you’re drunk you can just go get more in less than 10 minutes. Wreak havoc on your body, and soul then keep drinking to stop yourself from thinking about all of the things that you’ve said, done or missed out on, and then of course perpetuate that cycle, and do even more damage. I think that lockdown for me personally is what made this the worst as anyone who has drank too much for months at a time will know that it makes you think solely about all of the awful things that you’ve done in your life, all the pain, and the shame that people have brought to you, and all of the pain, and the shame that you have brought to them. Which obviously means that you live in an extremely distorted reality that’s hard to break even when sober. The concerts helped for a bit but only a bit as etiquette is out of the window these days, and you encounter a lot of strange people who either make you uncomfortable or actually abuse you, see above. Makes the world feel that extra bit even more lugubrious. Strangely, I’ve been treated worse at concerts than I ever have been in pubs (save for a couple). Now, given that pubs are generally toxic environments it says enough, and it’s really weird as I wouldn’t have otherwise expected this at concerts.

Incidentally, Imodium has helped me out with the issues that have plagued me since Thursday albeit I’m finally much better today. Just shit (funny) that I missed out on OMD. But I’m going to miss out on a hell of a lot more if I keep this up.

Best wishes, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:38, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I made this too much about me, FlightTime. I was just hoping that we could relate experiences but I’m not asking for anything that you don’t want. I just hope that you get the help that you need, and that I can have a brain transplant so that I’m better here haha, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:22, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I hope for the same my friend! Please know this, you are welcome at my talk and email me anytime. Have a great day :) - FlightTime (open channel) 20:30, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I only fax people lol. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 21:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damn, my fax hasn't worked for decades :P - FlightTime (open channel) 03:52, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll come fix it for you haha, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

checking in. I think maybe some people want to be your friend regardless :) so there. I don't edit music much but I think you are far from the only person in that topic area With the issue. There are lots of lonely articles out there that could use some love, just sating. The tranatltic phone charges must be murder Elinruby (talk) 22:39, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eye luv u very much, Elinruby. From myself, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 00:34, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Beltane Fire Festival Elinruby (talk) 00:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Take good care of yourselves but I’m going now. Take care, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 01:19, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

see you soon Elinruby (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Never again with any luck. I’m done here, and everywhere else. Best. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 01:26, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I was being rude, Elinruby. Too many shandies again, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 13:40, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I may get back into editing again but I’m very worried that I’ll just upset people again. As I’ll keep repeating, my editing style has almost been the same since I first started editing. I think that doing all of those concerts made me way more prominent on here, and with way more articles. Before this, I was only ever editing things that no one cared about — which is probably why no one was fussed about me. Obviously that changed, and so did the situation.

Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 17:43, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I always though the point of a shandy was to dilute the beer? Maybe for taste. But look Joe have you heard from anyone else about this? Elinruby (talk) 19:48, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was the joke ahaha, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My favourite drink is Strongbow Dark Fruit, but on the side I will have Thatchers Gold or Aspall Draught Suffolk Cyder. Don't really like beer, and don't buy spirits in as they're too expensive but occasionally I will have them in pubs... but pubs are becoming far too dear for me now,

Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:54, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Probably just as well, since you sound kinda depressed, frankly, and alcohol is a depressant. I think what you need is a change of wiki venue. Maybe some Zoloft. I've got had people complain when I change reference formats so I see both sides between you and Justin. What I keep trying to say to you is that if you just go fix some other problem somewhere else 90% of the strife on Wikipedia can be avoided and annoying Justin is not the sole measure of your value as an editor, ok? Elinruby (talk) 21:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Maintenance#Referencing Elinruby (talk) 22:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not depressed I’m Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 22:23, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And people seem to forget the euphoria stage of alcohol. Tends to lead to regrettable bullshit when you get too fucked though, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After the euphoria comes the I’m done here, and everywhere else stuff though. It is a depressant, just saying. But on. Can I interest you in some Scottish history articles maybe? Elinruby (talk) 04:07, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, I’m trying not to get blocked via doing anything on here haha. Too many eyes are on me at this point, and don’t like that sensation at all. It’s like everyone’s waiting for one false move. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 14:21, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Though to counter this I have appreciated the support as no one has needed to provide that at all. Maybe all I’m needing is a break, and then I’ll try to do things as asked. Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just go someplace that those people aren't. Edit the history of the Philippines or something. Elinruby (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Orla Gartland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Americana.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe Vitale 5, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! – Joe (talk) 11:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Boz-scaggs-lowdown-cbs-2.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file's talk page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 04:04, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Bill McKinney.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DoctorMatt (talk) 20:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I will try this. My edits are rarely undone or controversial but again I'll try, athough I'm not sure of what to write. Enjoy the rest of your Saturday.

Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 20:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. The issue is not whether your edits are undone or are controversial; using edit summaries is a courtesy to other editors, so we can quickly see the intention of your edits. Summaries can be things like: "added wikilink", "corrected spelling", "added See Also link", "reworded for clarity", "fixed typo", etc. They are a huge help. Cheers! DoctorMatt (talk) 21:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I mentioned your name at ANI in relation to Justin (koavf). This post is just for your information. You are allowed but not required to comment. Elinruby (talk) 00:27, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t understand? Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve since found the comment, and think that you were backing me up? I’m not sure because I’m too drunk, but like I don’t like Justin at all. He’s an awful bully, and extremely arrogant. He was the only person who couldn’t handle me when he tried to ban me. He’s a bit of a supercilious fellow. I would’ve swore but it’s not the place for that, and I too support a ban as he’s actually harmful to our community — something that should be inclusive for what are basically volunteers, me, and you both. I’ll repeat that I’m very grateful for those who came out in support of me as it was a very difficult time. I’ve tried to improve my editing style here since despite the ill feelings I was getting. Best wishes to you, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:04, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Were you saying that you wished to ban me from music-related articles? Sorry if I misunderstood that. I’ve since been auto-patrolled for creating articles as I created a few useful ones recently enough. Again, forgive me if I’m getting this wrong. Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 12:08, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No I was suggesting that for Justin. Apparently people feel he has had enough chances though. I brought you up as an example of the problems he causes. Ignore what Joe said; Justin was well-liked nonetheless, but I don't think you can be blamed for being a bit bitter that one of the last things he got away with was getting you sanctioned. Elinruby (talk) 06:48, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will however repeat my caution that editing while drunk seems guaranteed to get you into trouble at some point. Elinruby (talk) 07:54, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t usually edit drunk, as it doesn’t lead to anything productive. I am relatively sober right now as I only had some Pimm's which is not something that gets me drunk.

I felt that Justin brought me a lot of unnecessary drama, and was quite horrible when no one else was being or seemingly even as concerned as he was… but I fully accept that how I responded at the time probably wasn’t the best though.

I was trying to send him up, which worked to an extent as he didn’t understand me, and that was very much intentional.

Whatever the case — this will probably be for the best as I doubt anyone else would even attempt to come after me like he did — it was an awful display of behaviour, and made me paranoid.

But nonetheless, you’re probably right about not editing drunk but I felt there was a certain amount of urgency to responding. Much like I did at the time in regards to his mostly one-sided, and failed attempt at a manhunt… which again, just wasn’t necessary.

Hopefully the community is indeed better without him, and with some form of magnanimity, I hope that he can come back, with a healthier mindset, and approach to people. But for now, I’m just happy that he won’t be creating any more conflict. He was a nuisance calling other people nuisances. A very strange ego but it’s done now, isn’t it?

Best, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 08:13, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Last I looked, it looked like he was getting a timeout, yes Elinruby (talk) 13:53, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I’m more than happy to draw a line under this seems as it has been resolved by him creating unnecessary issues with other people that have been spoken out about which is more than enough vindication for me. I have other things that I’m way more rancour about in my personal life anyway. Comes with age 😂

Take care, Joe Vitale 5 (talk) 06:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Friend, Would you be interested in starting a page for new Nina Nesbitt album? KARANSUTTA (talk) 04:59, 3 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Style Council, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]