User talk:Jmrowland

Welcome!

Hello, Jmrowland, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Just H 22:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I was expecting to come down like the hammer of god for your edits to Shit, but they were good ones. And your edit summaries were, frankly, fucking awesome. I had to drop by to pass along this:

		The Barnstar of Good Humor
		Your potty-mouth amused me. WLU 01:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WLU 01:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have to apologize... I didn't mean my edit summaries to be insulting; I just couldn't resist wording it that way. And apparently you've taken them in the spirit in which they were intended, which I VERY MUCH appreciate. Thank you for writing.

The Shit entry, by the way, especially the Usage section, is the funniest thing I have read anywhere on the Web. You really know your shit.

rowley 16:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wish I could take the credit it, but some other editor wrote that shit. Probably several contributed to turn it from a collection of tiny little shits into a great big pile of shit. And I totally agree. The usages is the shit. Someone has mad ninja skills to write that much joyful use of profanity and still have it not set off my wikidar. I don't consider your edit summary insulting (wikipedia is not censored), but rather heartily appropriate to the page. WLU 17:10, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I reversed your changes to The Ultimate Gift. Please review placing punctuation marks outside of quotes and Wikipedia doesn't use spoiler alerts. Thanks! ∴ Therefore | talk 01:28, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kerouac fix ups. It seems when writing about him, that writing like him doesn't always work.  :) Leodmacleod 9:44, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Just an FYI, you posted your holiday well-wishes (thanks by the way, hope your holidays were good ones!) on my user page, not my talk page. When leaving messages for editors, it's always better to do so on the talk page for a variety of reasons. The user page (called "user page" in the tabs at the top !) is for editors to say something about themselves and their work. Yours is red right now because it is empty but ultimately you can use it to say things like "I'm Jim Rowland, I live in Hawaii, I'm interested in model airplanes and I have the best dog ever". The talk page (the next tab to the right, called "discussion" and since you're reading this, it would be in bold) is for communication and results in the orange box at the top of the page when signed in.

Thanks, WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 16:03, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User_talk page...? Would that be found under the "discussion" tab?rowley (talk) 00:03, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, it's the "discussion" tab, but the url ends in user_talk. Right now we're on the talk page, and you obviously added something to your user page recently 'cause it's blue now. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules:^simple/_complex 16:41, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/british/orientated_1

Well, blow me down. I retract the statement, with apologies. rowley (talk) 02:44, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited The First Edition (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alex Harvey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry your comment on the Talk:Inductance page was never really addressed; some of the editors on that page get a mite hot. I agree with you about the article; a lot of the technological articles on WP seem to be short on plain English. I'd like to try to improve that. I'd be interested in any comments you have about the article, what specifically was understandable and where it descended into esoteric. Cheers. --Chetvorno^TALK 07:02, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good evening:

Please allow me to share an article with you. Maybe you will find it interesting:

http://www.naturapop.com/home/scientific-investigations-at-loch-ness — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.2.207.74 (talk) 01:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wrath of the Titans, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clash of the Titans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:26, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. —Deckiller (t-c-l) 06:45, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bogusław Linda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Amerika (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:02, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I got my labels|links backwards. Fixed. rowley (talk) 16:06, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lana Wood, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diamonds Are Forever (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article Drifting in Silence has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NMUSIC

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. KH-1 (talk) 03:51, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Acorn, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Leaching. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that links to disabiguation pages are usually a bad idea. But in this case, the link is appropriate, as the usage of the word in the Acorn article is relevant to more than one of the topics listed on the disambiguation page. rowley (talk) 01:42, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jmrowland! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Dhanyamalini that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 07:42, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]