User:Mattinbgn/Resources

• User:Tony1/How to satisfy Criterion 1a: redundancy exercises
• User:Tony1/Advanced editing exercises
• Disambiguation links finder

• Articles for deletion
• Criteria for speedy deletion
• Australia related deletions

• Australian towns - to do list
• Category:Australia articles without infoboxes
• Template:Infobox Australian place
• Template:Census 2006 AUS
• ABS Census data
• Federal electorate search
• NSW electorate search
• Victorian electorate and LGA search
• Tasmanian local government areas
• WA electorates
• Qld electorates
• SA electorates
• SA LGAs
• User:ScottDavis/plain town names/Victoria

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Cricket/Australian biography worklist
• Recent changes on Test cricketers
• Test match template
• Template:Invincibles Advert
• Template:OzTestCaptain Advert

• Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list
• Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide
• Wikipedia:Username policy
• Wikipedia:Usernames for administrator attention
• Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not that important

A quote I found particularly insightful, especially given this:

Here's the deal. There is a growing group of people who are coming to the realization that Wikipedia is not always a force for good. In particular, when we record for posterity the minor details of people's lives, they have to live with a Wikipedia article coming up as the first hit on Google for the rest of their natural life. That's not necessarily fair, nor is it necessarily good for the long-term of the encyclopedia. I don't want to be involved with a project whose mission of human knowledge has been so twisted as to require us to document with meticulous detail for all eternity the lives of anyone who ever did something funny, stupid, criminal, minorly newsworthy or got converted into an Interwebs meme. That's not just me - it's a lot of other people, too. In these cases, Wikipedia has the potential to actively harm people by preventing people from ever forgetting something happened. We're prolonging 15 minutes of fame into a theoretically-permanent Wikipedia article. In my, and many others, opinions, that is not a good thing. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a permanent record of everything any person ever did that got in a newspaper. Either you get on this train of thought, or you're going to be left behind, because this is the direction the encyclopedia will go. End of story User:FCYTravis 14:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Subpages: Userboxes • Contributions • Notes • Resources • Sandbox • Templates • Vanity • All

WikiProjects: Australia • Australian Places • Riverina • Cricket • Victoria • Northern Territory • New South Wales • Queensland • South Australia

Projects: English Wikipedia • Commons • Meta-Wiki