Template talk:Islam and other religions

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Islam This template is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles Religion: Interfaith This template is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles This template is within the scope of Interfaith work group, a work group which is currently considered to be inactive.

This template was considered for deletion on 2020 April 4. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".

Look like this template is now getting hit by Scientus' crusade to replace antisemitism with his favorite obscure neologism. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:26, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• WP:IDIOM " If a literal interpretation of a phrase makes no sense in the context of a sentence, it should be reworded. "
• Literal and figurative language: Literal language uses words directly according to their proper meanings (signified).
• Sign (linguistics):the signifier (French signifiant), the "shape" of a word, its phonic component, i.e. the sequence of graphemes (letters), e.g., <"c">-<"a">-<"t">, or phonemes (speech sounds), e.g. /kæt/

As the antisemitism article already makes states "anti" "semite" and "ism" are three graphemes. Literally this means antagonism against all Semites, and there are far more Muslim Semites than Jewish Semites, which violates WP:IDIOM above, thus it must be reworded. Judeophobia is a term over a hundred years old with wide usage in books that even my small local library has, and the Zionist phamphlet from which it came is widely cited [1], thus it is not a neologism. Also, the word Judeophobia has even influenced the term Islamophobia.

antisemitism in the context of islam is contradictory on many levels, and should be change to the clear term JudeophobiaScientus (talk) 01:35, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We've been through this. You're getting into disruptive editing territory. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:05, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This editor has a history of NPOV edits to advance his or her POV. See this edit from yesterday and others previously discussed here and here. TJRC (talk) 17:33, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]