[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:Portia labiata

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePortia labiata has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 5, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
October 21, 2011Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 15, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that females of the jumping spider Portia labiata use silk draglines as territory marks, and use these to avoid females of higher fighting ability and spend more time around less powerful fighters?
Current status: Good article

Suggestions from a Behavioral Ecology Student

[edit]

Hello! I am a student from a behavioral ecology course working on the Wikispiders project. This article has some really interesting, well-written information especially about the hunting tactics of the spider. I would suggest breaking some of the larger blocks of text into some of the WikiSpider General Guideline suggestions. For example, making a section on webs and physiology of the spider. This will make the article more user friendly and organized. Akwan826 (talk) 05:04, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

[edit]

Hi, I am also another student working to contribute to the Wikispiders project. I definitely think that some of the larger paragraphs could be further broken down to be read more easily. I would also suggest adding an "Enemies" section to be able to talk more about the diseases. In addition, adding the "parental care" section could be helpful because I think some of the paragraphs in the "Reproduction and lifestyle" has a lot of elements that could be under "parental care". Wikispiders11 (talk) 12:47, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]