Talk:Marie Jahoda

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). Women scientists Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Women writers Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was full of mistakes! She was imprisoned by the fascists beacuse she was a socialist, of which there is no mention! —Preceding unsigned comment added by RosaJochmann (talk • contribs) 15:46, 9 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is OR and I cannot of course include it. I was a student at Sussex 1967-1970, and in our first days we were given an IQ test. We were told at the time that Prof Jahoda was researching the relationship between IQ and eventual level of degree obtained; but I never saw a follow up. Does anyone have more info? Cross Reference (talk) 20:32, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

She has been put in the Category:Economists of innovation although she is a psychologist.

Marie Jahoda has been very active in the SPRU with Christopher Freeman and Keith Pavitt.

"Economics of innovation" should be taken in a broader sense including Law (IP), psychology, soociology, neurosciences, etc... Euroflux (talk) 14:38, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence of the Bigoraphy section is corrupt - probably a previous edit went wrong. What does "henceforward" refer to? And was she imprisoned under Dollfuss or under Schuschnigg?94.192.70.38 (talk) 13:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This section is not fully consistent with Jahoda's 1958 book Current Concepts of Positive Mental Health (New York: Basic Books, Inc.). In that book, the most succinct summary of her conception of "ideal mental health" (n.b.: that phrase is not used in the book) is to be found on p. 23, where the "six major categories of concepts" are: "attitudes of an individual toward his own self"; "the individual's style and degree of growth, development, or self-actualization"; "a central synthesizing psychological function.... [t]his function will here be called integration"; "autonomy" which "singles out the individual's degree of independence from social influences"; "adequacy of an individual's perception of reality"; and "environmental mastery" (which on p. 53 is said to include "(1) the ability to love; (2) adequacy in love, work, and play; (3) adequacy in interpersonal relations; (4) efficiency in meeting situational requirements; (5) capacity for adaptation and adjustment; (6) efficiency in problem-solving"). Because the current text is misleading, I suggest that we modify this section to reflect the content of Jahoda's published work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stpeter (talk • contribs) 00:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]