Talk:History of Malta

This  level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Malta Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Malta, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Malta on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaltaWikipedia:WikiProject MaltaTemplate:WikiProject MaltaMalta Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. History Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. European history High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist. [[Ancient Roman units of measurement#Weight|Roman weight measurements]] The anchor (Weight) has been deleted. Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

And the English is poor. Needs PROFESSIONAL editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.68.94.86 (talk) 08:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"By the end of August, the Gladiators were reinforced by twelve Hawker Hurricanes which had arrived via HMS Argus.[16] During the first five months of combat, the island's aircraft destroyed or damaged about thirty-seven Italian aircraft, while suffering even greater losses than the Italians."

How can this be possible when the preceding statements suggest that there were only 16 British aircraft on the island? 119.224.81.14 (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

there was more. 77.71.206.198 (talk) 11:20, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The paragraph "Under protest, Dom Mintoff resigned as Prime Minister along with all the MLP deputies on 21 April 1958. Georgio Borg Olivier was offered to form an alternative government by Governor Laycock but refused. This led to the Governor declaring a state of emergency thus suspending the constitution and Malta was placed under direct colonial administration from London. The MLP had now fully abandoned support for integration (when Mintoff's demands for financial guarantees were not accepted) and now advocated full independence from the British Crown" makes no sense. Mintoff may have resigned as PM, but MLP deputies did not resign from parliament. Olivier was asked to form a government, not offered to form. The statement of emergency is just what that says, it does not suspend the constitution or place Malta under direct rule. The MLP did not advocate "full independence from the British Crown", they advocated full independence as a Dominion under the Crown.Royalcourtier (talk) 05:50, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been elevated to B class and I haven't looked to see if this was bot or independent editor assessed. There is a lot of content, and a lot of section tags. A problem is there are issues with failing to meet the assigned class criteria. All of the section tags are not in themselves an issue, as provided by, The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies (#2), of the assessment criteria, except the lead section criteria. The article has a defined structure (#3), as covered by the Manual of style regarding the lead. This should have been considered. The main concern, is The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations(#1). but the

• Geology and prehistory section has no source or references, or the subsection,
• Neolithic and Temple period, and
• Bronze Age; that has one reference.

The editing guideline contains "quality standards" criteria ensuring "distribution-quality article"(s). This article fails the criteria for "B class" rating in more than one area. Otr500 (talk) 03:44, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am simply arguing for the need of more contemporary information. I realize that this is a history page, but the most recent events are 7-8 years old. I would suggest the addition of relevant historical information from 2013-2020 as an improvement to this page. Señorza (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Have seen nothing here about problems citing The Times of Malta, as noted by Ravenswing. All my historical additions were cited from the newspaper. Knightoften (talk) 03:42, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• ... and answered on your own talk page. Ravenswing 03:47, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, we seem to have been writing at the same time, friend. Not sure what to think now - seems I stumbled into something odd! Knightoften (talk) 03:53, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]