[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/Jump to content

Talk:Goleta, California

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleGoleta, California was one of the Geography and places good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 2, 2006Good article nomineeListed
September 14, 2007Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

Seal

[edit]

I've seen the city seal many times, especially on the police cars. Where is it on the internet? --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 03:24, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They've redesigned their website, and taken it off most everywhere. You can still find it in the PDF downloads: a color version is in the Notice of Preparation of the Proposed City of Goleta Draft General Plan (link is here: [1]). Antandrus (talk) 02:57, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Redirected?

[edit]

i got here from a link on the 'list of massacres' page & the 'goleta postal massacre' page,shouldnt that only be about the shooting and not the entire history of the town?,the link to va tech shootings or any other on the list of massacres dont have the whole history of the town.

im not the best wiki-editor but i think i can create the page and just use the info from here.

any objections?

"FOUR TILDES" 15:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Redirects. I'm a tad confused about what you're trying to do. --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 03:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

just to clairfy my previous comment, when i clicked the link 'goleta postal massacre' it went to 'goleta,ca' page...see the difference,on is the city and the other is the shootings,i was at the page 'list of massacres' not list of cities,make sense now?4tildes_3:59pm_10/15/7 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Otis66Driftwood (talkcontribs) 20:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lake Los Carneros

[edit]

If the seasonal Lake Los Carneros is counted, then shouldn't the census data show more than 0.1 sq mi of water? And there are a large number (3-4?) of creeks running through the city. --hello, i'm a member | talk to me! 06:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated Goleta, California for a GA Review. T Rex | talk 16:25, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The result of the review was to Delist. An archive of the discussion can be found here. Drewcifer 06:35, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Goleta Architecture

[edit]

An unregistered user added an Architecture subsection(2.6.0) in the Geography section(2.0.0) in between Fauna(2.5.0) and Urban Environment(2.7.0), but there is no content. Can someone please add content to it? Also, content has to be added to In Popular Culture(9.0.0), Environment(2.1.0), and Ecology(2.2.0). Evancahill (talk) 20:47, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I left another message for that user to please start citing their additions, since that's an official Wikipedia policy - I noticed they added back that nonsense about rattlesnakes being common in Goleta neighborhoods. (You can find them at the urban/wildland boundary, but this anon's additions have no such nuance.) Antandrus (talk) 21:35, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, they do appear occasionally but they aren't common, not like lizards, raccoons, and skunks. I'll add back in the Architecture, Environment, and Ecology if I can find any info about them. Evancahill (talk) 15:52, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Goleta, California. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]