Talk:Expert Infantryman Badge

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: North America / United States C‑class This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles C This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  North American military history task force United States military history task force Orders, decorations, and medals Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of orders, decorations, and medals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Orders, decorations, and medalsWikipedia:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsTemplate:WikiProject Orders, decorations, and medalsOrders, decorations, and medals articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

An Army Regulation manual contains the Army Regulation and the regulation is the authority, not the manual... Deathbunny 22:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

18Ds (Special Forces Medics) are now eligible for the CIB as of 03JUN05. http://www.tioh.hqda.pentagon.mil/UniformedServices/Badges/combat_infantryman.aspx I'm not fully familiar with Wikipedia standards, so it's nice if someone could fix that. CWslater 2243, 12 August 2010 (EDT) —Preceding undated comment added 00:45, 13 August 2010 (UTC).[reply]

No one in the Army uses a blue pen. Soldiers carry black ink pens. This claim is urban legend nonsense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.127.185.105 (talk) 14:30, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is wrong blue and black are both allowed in uniform . Red is often used for corrections. For the sake of EIB many grade blue as go and red as no go. This is from experience as a EIB candidate and graded Cowsthatfloat (talk) 03:18, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Expert Infantryman Badge. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131017045050/http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r600_8_22.pdf to http://armypubs.army.mil/epubs/pdf/r600_8_22.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The EIB is a us army award, And primarily for us army infantrymen there was no need or context to having the only photo being a Korean soldier get the award. That makes no sense. I added a foreign military section to include the rok soldier and will continue adding different militaries who have participated.

I do not want this to turn into a fight over editing again. It has been a problem that non-military or non infantry editors continue to put misinformation in the infantry sections . Cowsthatfloat (talk) 03:15, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]